Title Review and Curative Work Attorney in Franklin, TN

Comprehensive Guide to Title Review and Curative Work in Franklin

Title review and curative work address defects and uncertainties that can affect the ownership and marketability of real property. When purchasing, selling, or refinancing property in Franklin, careful examination of the title record helps identify liens, ambiguous ownership histories, recording errors, and other issues that could interfere with a clean transfer. Our overview explains what to expect during a title review, why resolving defects matters for future transfers and financing, and how targeted curative work can mitigate risk, protect asset value, and help transactions move forward without unexpected legal or financial obstacles.

Buying or selling real estate can uncover problems that are not visible in a simple property search. Curative work involves legal and administrative steps to correct or clarify title issues such as missing deeds, incorrect legal descriptions, undisclosed heirs, or outstanding liens. Addressing these matters before closing reduces the risk of post-closing disputes and enhances the ability to obtain clear title insurance. This page outlines the process in Franklin, Tennessee, and describes practical approaches for resolving defects efficiently while preserving the value and transferability of your property.

Why Title Review and Curative Work Matter for Franklin Property Transactions

Comprehensive title review and curative work protect the interests of buyers, sellers, and lenders by revealing hidden encumbrances and correcting record defects. Resolving these matters avoids delays at closing, prevents future disputes over ownership, and strengthens the position for refinancing or resale. Curative steps may include drafting corrective deeds, obtaining affidavits, negotiating lien releases, or pursuing quiet title remedies. By taking preventive measures during a transaction, property owners in Franklin reduce the likelihood of costly litigation and ensure that their ownership rights are clear and marketable for years to come.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm — Franklin Title Review and Curative Services

Jay Johnson Law Firm provides local-focused legal assistance for real estate matters in Franklin and across Williamson County. We combine practical knowledge of Tennessee real property procedures with hands-on experience in title review and curative actions. Our team prioritizes clear communication and step-by-step guidance so clients understand timelines, potential obstacles, and likely outcomes. We handle document drafting, negotiations with lienholders or other interested parties, and coordinate with title companies and county registries to resolve issues efficiently and support smooth real estate closings.

Understanding Title Review and Curative Work in Franklin, TN

Title review begins with a careful examination of recorded documents and public records related to a parcel of land. The goal is to identify any restrictions, liens, judgments, easements, or discrepancies in ownership that could affect the buyer or lender. Curative work follows when the review uncovers defects that must be cleared or clarified to produce marketable title. These corrective measures can vary widely depending on the issue and may require communications with prior owners, heirs, mortgage holders, or municipal authorities to resolve contested or unclear interests in the property.

The process often involves both legal research and practical problem solving. In Tennessee, curative work may require deed corrections, affidavits of heirship, releases of liens, or actions filed in chancery or circuit court to quiet title. Each matter has its own facts and appropriate remedies, and the timeline can depend on cooperation from third parties and the nature of the defect. Working early in a transaction to identify and address title concerns can prevent closing delays and protect the owner’s ability to sell, refinance, or use the property as collateral.

What Title Review and Curative Work Actually Entail

Title review is the process of inspecting recorded documents, surveys, and public filings to determine the legal status of a property’s title. Curative work refers to the tools and legal steps used to remedy defects discovered during review. Typical tasks include correcting deed errors, obtaining missing signatures through affidavits, negotiating releases for old liens, clarifying boundary descriptions, and preparing court filings when necessary. The objective is to remove clouds on title so the property can be confidently transferred or encumbered, and to provide courts and title insurers with clear documentation supporting ownership.

Key Elements and Typical Steps in Title Curative Work

Effective curative work relies on accurate record review, fact finding, and targeted legal action. Essential elements include identifying the specific defect, locating relevant documents or parties, assessing available remedies, and preparing the appropriate corrective instruments. Common processes include preparing corrective deeds, securing affidavits from prior owners or heirs, negotiating lien releases, and filing quiet title actions when informal resolution is not possible. Coordination with title companies and county recording offices is often necessary to ensure corrected documents are properly recorded and accepted by insurers and lenders.

Key Terms and Glossary for Title Review and Curative Work

Familiarity with common terms helps property owners and participants follow the curative process. Knowing the definitions of items like lien, encumbrance, quiet title, corrective deed, and chain of title enables clearer conversations with attorneys, title companies, and lenders. The glossary below provides concise explanations of these frequently encountered concepts and how they relate to title review. Understanding these terms makes it easier to make informed decisions during negotiations and to appreciate why certain documents or court actions may be recommended to clear an ownership issue.

Chain of Title

Chain of title refers to the chronological sequence of recorded documents that trace ownership of a property from its original grant to the present owner. It includes deeds, mortgages, assignments, and other instruments that affect ownership. A complete and unbroken chain of title demonstrates how ownership has been transferred and helps identify any gaps or inconsistencies that could create doubts about legal ownership. During title review, identifying breaks or ambiguities in the chain is essential because such gaps often require curative steps to secure marketable title.

Quiet Title

A quiet title action is a court proceeding used to resolve disputes or clarify ownership of real property when informal resolution is not possible. Filing this action asks the court to declare the rightful owner and to extinguish claims or competing interests that lack legal standing. Courts issue orders that can clear clouds on title, validate a corrected deed, or resolve adverse claims. While court procedures can be more time-consuming and costly than administrative remedies, they provide a definitive legal determination that recorders and title insurers typically accept.

Curative Deed (Corrective Deed)

A curative deed, sometimes called a corrective deed, is a document prepared to fix a prior recording error or to reflect the intended transfer of ownership. These deeds can correct a misspelled name, an incorrect legal description, or other clerical mistakes that affect marketability. The deed typically refers to the original transaction and explains the correction being made. Recording the corrective deed with county offices helps update the public record and often resolves title company concerns, allowing title insurance to be issued and closings to proceed.

Affidavit of Heirship

An affidavit of heirship is a sworn statement used to establish the identity of heirs when a property owner died without a recorded will or when recorded documentation is missing. It typically describes the decedent’s family relationships and property history and is signed by witnesses who knew the family. While not a substitute for formal probate, an affidavit can assist in transferring title to heirs or clearing title for a transaction when probate records are limited or unavailable, and may be accepted by title companies in appropriate circumstances.

Comparing Limited vs. Comprehensive Approaches to Title Curative Work

When a title defect is found, parties decide whether a limited, targeted approach or a broader, comprehensive plan is appropriate. A limited approach addresses a single, straightforward issue that can be corrected with a simple instrument or release. A comprehensive approach evaluates the entire chain of title and related matters, potentially uncovering multiple issues and coordinating long-term solutions. The right path depends on the defect’s nature, transaction timelines, and the buyer or lender’s tolerance for residual risk. Selecting the correct approach helps balance cost, speed, and protection of future property interests.

When a Targeted Curative Approach Is Appropriate:

Simple Clerical or Recording Errors

A limited approach often suffices for straightforward clerical errors such as misspelled names, incorrect grantor or grantee information, or minor legal description typos. These problems can frequently be resolved by executing a corrective deed or affidavit and recording the corrected document with the county recorder. If the mistake does not reflect a substantive dispute over ownership or a hidden lien, addressing it directly can restore record clarity quickly. This path is typically faster and less expensive than litigation-based remedies when third parties are cooperative.

Resolved or Minor Liens and Releases

When outstanding encumbrances are small, clearly tied to an identified transaction, or already settled but not released properly, a limited curative route can work well. Negotiating or obtaining short-form lien releases, reconciling payments, or providing payoff documentation to the title company can clear the issue. These solutions are effective when the parties responsible for the lien are reachable and willing to cooperate, and when there is documentary evidence demonstrating resolution. Taking prompt action prevents the matter from becoming a more complex legal dispute.

When a Broader Curative Strategy Is Necessary:

Multiple or Interrelated Title Defects

A comprehensive approach becomes necessary when a title review reveals multiple defects or issues that interact, such as competing claims, unclear successions, or boundary disputes. In these circumstances, addressing only one defect may leave other problems unresolved, undermining marketability. Comprehensive curative work evaluates the entire property history, traces potential claimants, and coordinates corrective measures across several fronts. This approach reduces the likelihood of recurring disputes and provides a more robust foundation for obtaining title insurance and finalizing a transaction without lingering uncertainties.

Complicated Successions or Unknown Heirs

When ownership paths involve deceased owners with no clear probate record, missing heirs, or transfers that were not properly documented, a comprehensive plan is often the best course. Such matters may require in-depth genealogical research, multiple affidavits, negotiation with potential claimants, or court petitions to quiet title. Taking a thorough approach reduces the risk that an undisclosed heir or claimant will emerge later and challenge the transfer. While more time-consuming, this work protects future transactions and clarifies long-term ownership for all parties involved.

Benefits of Taking a Comprehensive Approach to Curative Work

A comprehensive approach minimizes the chance of future title disputes by addressing present issues and seeking out related problems that could surface later. This proactive method tends to produce more durable results, making properties easier to insure, finance, and transfer. Lenders and buyers gain greater confidence in the integrity of the title. Additionally, a complete resolution often avoids repeated interventions over time, which can save money and time in the long run by consolidating efforts and achieving finality through recorded corrections or court orders.

By coordinating curative measures across the relevant documents and stakeholders, a comprehensive plan creates a clear public record that supports marketability. It also addresses potential chain-of-title weaknesses that might not be apparent in an initial review. This approach provides a structured path to final resolution, whether through corrective documents, negotiated releases, or judicial determinations. The result is a property title that is simpler to manage in subsequent sales, refinancing, or estate planning contexts, and less likely to generate surprise claims.

Improved Marketability and Lender Confidence

Comprehensive curative work tends to increase marketability by eliminating doubts that can give buyers or lenders pause. Clearing recorded defects and documenting resolutions with properly recorded instruments makes it easier to obtain title insurance and lender approval for financing. When title matters are resolved thoroughly, property owners face fewer hurdles when selling or leveraging property, since subsequent purchasers will see a cleaner record. This enhanced clarity protects transactional momentum and can even broaden the pool of potential buyers or financing options available to the owner.

Long-Term Protection Against Future Claims

A thorough curative strategy reduces the likelihood that unknown or overlooked issues will arise after a transaction closes. By pursuing complete resolution—including obtaining recorded corrective deeds, releases, or court orders—property owners gain stronger protection against later claims from heirs, lienholders, or other interested parties. This permanence is especially important for families, investors, and institutions that plan to hold or use the property over time. Final, well-documented solutions minimize the need for renewed legal work in the future and provide peace of mind for successive owners.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Pro Tips for Smooth Title Review and Curative Work

Begin Title Review Early

Starting the title review process early in a transaction provides time to discover and address hidden issues before a scheduled closing. Early review reduces last-minute rushes and allows for gathering documents, locating signatories, and negotiating releases without pressure. It also helps buyers and sellers understand potential costs and timelines for curative steps. Engaging with all parties involved, including the title company and lender, at an early stage makes coordination smoother and increases the likelihood that problems can be resolved without disrupting the transaction.

Gather Historical Documents and Contacts

Collecting prior deeds, mortgage satisfactions, wills, and probate documents can speed resolution of title issues. Historical records often reveal the source of defects and identify individuals who must sign corrective documents or provide affidavits. Having contact information for previous owners, heirs, or lienholders expedites communication and helps assess whether informal releases or corrective deeds are possible. When records are incomplete, documenting efforts to locate missing information also supports later curative measures or court filings, demonstrating diligence in resolving the matter.

Coordinate with Title Companies and Lenders

Regular communication with the title company and any involved lenders helps align expectations and ensures curative steps meet underwriting requirements. Title companies can advise on acceptable forms of documentation and whether an insurer will issue coverage after specific remedies. Lenders may require certain assurances before funding a loan. By involving these stakeholders early and keeping them informed, parties can avoid surprises at closing and confirm that corrective instruments are properly drafted and recorded to satisfy all contractual and underwriting conditions.

Why Consider Title Review and Curative Work for Your Franklin Property

Title review and curative work are appropriate whenever there is any question about ownership history, recorded liens, or document accuracy. Buyers use these services to confirm they will receive marketable title; sellers rely on them to clear issues that might derail a sale; and lenders insist on clear title before closing. Even routine transactions can uncover unexpected items that require attention. Prioritizing title clarity protects property value, reduces the risk of post-closing disputes, and ensures that future transfers occur without legal complications.

Property owners should also consider curative work as part of estate planning, refinancing, or investment strategies where clean title supports desired outcomes. Families dealing with inherited property may need to establish legal ownership paths and resolve competing claims. Investors may seek assurance that title issues will not threaten financing or resale. Addressing title defects proactively can prevent litigation, preserve equity, and simplify future transactions, providing practical benefits beyond the immediate purchase or sale.

Common Situations That Require Title Review and Curative Work

Typical circumstances include purchases involving older properties with long ownership histories, parcels with complex boundary descriptions, transactions where prior mortgages or liens appear unresolved, and transfers that follow a decedent’s death without clear probate. Recording errors, misspelled names, and unresolved contractor liens are frequent triggers. Any sign of disputed ownership claims, incomplete chains of title, or missing documentation should prompt a full review. Identifying these conditions early allows parties to choose appropriate remedies and avoid costly surprises later.

Old or Incomplete Records

Properties with long or fragmented recording histories sometimes show gaps that make ownership unclear. Older deeds may reference landmarks or terminology that does not align with modern surveys, or records may be missing due to clerical issues. In such cases, a detailed title review and coordinated curative work, including corrective deeds or additional recorded statements, restore clarity. Researching historical filings and assembling a cohesive chain of title are essential steps for resolving these issues and establishing confidence in the current owner’s claim.

Heirs and Probate-Related Transfers

When property transfers after a death without a clear probate record, identifying heirs and documenting succession is often necessary to clear title. Affidavits of heirship, probate records, or court-approved instruments may be required to confirm the lawful successors. In some instances, additional curative actions or court petitions are needed to remove clouds on title. Thoughtful handling of probate-related transfers ensures that heirs receive proper credit and that the property’s record supports future transactions without dispute.

Unreleased Liens or Mistaken Mortgages

Occasionally a mortgage satisfaction or lien release was not properly recorded, leaving an encumbrance on the title record. Even when debts have been paid, absent documentation can block closing or prevent title insurance issuance. Curative work involves obtaining the appropriate release or preparing affidavits and corrected recordings to reflect satisfaction. Tracking down lienholders and obtaining recorded evidence of release resolves these issues so the property can be transferred or refinanced without lingering encumbrances.

Jay Johnson

Franklin Title Review and Curative Counsel

If you face title questions or need curative work for property in Franklin or Williamson County, local counsel can guide you through the necessary steps and coordinate with title companies and recording offices. We provide clear explanations of possible remedies, draft corrective instruments, and pursue court-based actions when informal measures are insufficient. Acting promptly and methodically on title issues preserves transactional momentum and protects long-term ownership interests, helping families and investors proceed with confidence in their real estate decisions.

Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Title Review and Curative Work in Franklin

Jay Johnson Law Firm offers focused assistance for real estate title issues in Franklin, drawing on knowledge of local recording practices and relationships with title companies and county officials. Our approach emphasizes thorough record review, transparent communication, and practical solutions tailored to each matter. We prioritize cost-effective options and explain when a targeted fix is sufficient or when broader action is warranted. Clients appreciate having a single point of contact to manage communications, document preparation, and coordination with other stakeholders.

We work with buyers, sellers, lenders, and families to resolve issues that can delay closings or cloud ownership. That includes drafting corrective deeds, securing releases, preparing affidavits, and filing necessary petitions when court resolution is required. Throughout the process we keep clients informed of likely timelines and potential outcomes. Our goal is to remove obstacles and produce recorded documentation that supports clear title and satisfies title insurers and lenders so transactions can proceed smoothly.

Communication and attention to detail are central to how we manage curative matters. We coordinate with title companies and county registries to confirm recording requirements and verify that corrections meet underwriting standards. By assembling the required evidence and following recording procedures carefully, we reduce the chance of future surprises. When litigation becomes necessary, we prepare and pursue the appropriate court remedies with the same focus on clarity and resolution, seeking durable outcomes for property owners and their successors.

Get Started on Resolving Your Title Issues in Franklin Today

How Our Firm Handles Title Review and Curative Work

Our process begins with a complete review of title reports and recorded documents to identify defects and possible remedies. We then discuss findings with the client and recommend a plan, prioritizing less invasive solutions when appropriate. If corrective documents are needed, we prepare and coordinate execution and recording. When negotiations with lienholders or interested parties are required, we represent the client’s interests in communications and settlements. If court action is necessary, we proceed with filings and advocate for a resolution that clears title and protects ownership rights.

Step One: Initial Title Review and Investigation

The initial step involves gathering all relevant title documents, inspecting public records, and determining the exact nature of any defect. This review is comprehensive, covering deeds, mortgages, liens, easements, and any recorded judgments. We analyze how these items affect marketability and identify parties who must be contacted or whose signatures are required. This fact-finding stage establishes the foundation for recommending either simple corrective measures or a more extensive curative strategy, based on the transaction timeline and the parties’ objectives.

Document Collection and Chain of Title Review

During document collection we obtain recorded deeds, mortgage satisfactions, and other filings that make up the chain of title. Examining these records helps reveal missing links, conflicting conveyances, or ambiguous descriptions. We also check county clerk and register of deeds records for possible recording irregularities. This careful review is essential to determine whether a corrective deed, affidavit, or release will suffice or whether further inquiries or court action are warranted to establish clear ownership and satisfy underwriting requirements.

Identify Affected Parties and Necessary Actions

Once defects are identified, we make a list of affected parties, such as prior owners, heirs, lenders, or lienholders, and determine the actions needed from each. This may include obtaining signatures on corrective deeds, securing lien releases, or preparing affidavits of heirship. For parties who are difficult to locate, we recommend steps to document due diligence. Clear identification of stakeholders and required actions streamlines the curative plan and improves the prospects for timely resolution and recording of corrective instruments.

Step Two: Curative Action and Negotiation

After identifying the required fixes, we implement curative actions by drafting corrective documents, negotiating releases, and coordinating with title companies. This phase often involves communication with third parties to secure cooperation and signatures. If informal resolution is feasible, we prepare and record the necessary instruments. When negotiations are needed to obtain a release or settlement, we represent the client’s interests in those discussions, aiming to secure a documented outcome that can be recorded and accepted by insurers and lenders.

Drafting and Recording Corrective Documents

Drafting corrective documents requires precise language that explains the reason for the correction and references the original instruments. We prepare deeds, affidavits, and releases that meet county recording requirements and the expectations of title companies. Proper execution and notarization are then arranged, and we submit the documents for recordation. Accurate drafting and correct recording are critical for ensuring that the public record reflects the intended ownership and resolves the identified defect in a way that underwriters will accept.

Negotiating Releases and Settlements

When liens or claims remain in dispute, negotiation may secure a recorded release or settlement that removes the encumbrance. We work to reach pragmatic resolutions with creditors, contractors, or other claimants, documenting agreements and ensuring formal releases are recorded. Negotiated outcomes often save time and expense compared with litigation, and they provide a workable path to obtain title insurance. We document terms carefully to prevent reassertion of claims and confirm that recorded releases adequately protect the client’s title interests.

Step Three: Court Action and Final Resolution

If informal remedies prove inadequate, we prepare and file the appropriate court actions to obtain definitive resolution. This can include quiet title suits, petitions to confirm corrective deeds, or other filings that seek judicial declarations affecting ownership and encumbrances. Court action aims to produce a final, enforceable order that clears the title and enables recording of documents that reflect the court’s determination. Although litigation can take longer, it often provides the conclusive results required by title companies and future purchasers.

Filing Quiet Title and Related Actions

When necessary, we file quiet title actions or similar petitions to resolve competing claims or ambiguous ownership. These actions present evidence to the court and request an order declaring the rightful owner and extinguishing unsupported claims. Obtaining a court order places the resolution on the public record and gives purchasers and lenders the assurance they need. Preparing a successful court case requires careful assembly of documentation, witness statements, and legal argument tailored to Tennessee property law and local procedural requirements.

Implementing Court Orders and Recording Final Documents

After obtaining a favorable court order, we ensure that the judgment or decree is correctly reflected in recorded instruments and that any required documents are presented to the county recorder. This may include entry of corrected deeds, recording of the court’s order, and follow-up with title companies to confirm acceptance for underwriting. Proper implementation and recording finalize the curative process and make the resolution visible to future purchasers and lenders, securing the intended ownership result for the client.

Title Review and Curative Work FAQs

What is title curative work and why might I need it?

Title curative work encompasses the legal and administrative steps taken to correct defects discovered in a title review. These issues can include unresolved liens, recording errors, unclear successions, or discrepancies in legal descriptions. Curative actions may involve drafting corrective deeds, securing lien releases, preparing affidavits of heirship, or negotiating settlements with claimants. The primary goal is to remove clouds on title so that the property can be transferred or financed with confidence.You might need curative work if a title report flags problems that could affect marketability or if a lender requires clear title before funding. Addressing defects early reduces the risk of post-closing disputes and increases the likelihood that a title company will insure the transaction without significant exceptions.

The timeline for curative work varies depending on the complexity of the issues and the cooperation of third parties. Simple clerical corrections or obtaining a recorded release can take a few days to a few weeks, while more involved matters such as locating missing heirs or negotiating releases may take several weeks to months. Court actions, if required, typically extend the timeline due to filing, service, and hearing schedules.Factors that influence timing include the availability of historical records, the speed of negotiations with lienholders, and county recording schedules. Starting the review early and providing as much documentation as possible helps expedite the process and can reduce delays before closing.

Not all curative matters require court proceedings. Many defects can be resolved through corrective recordings, affidavits, or negotiated releases that are acceptable to the title company and lender. These informal remedies are often faster and less costly than litigation and are suitable when the affected parties are reachable and willing to cooperate.Court action becomes necessary when parties cannot be located, when claims are contested, or when a definitive legal determination is needed to clear competing interests. In those cases, a quiet title action or similar petition provides a final judgment that places the resolution on the public record and supports title insurance and future transfers.

Title companies sometimes issue insurance with exceptions when minor defects are present, but the acceptability of such exceptions depends on the insurer and the buyer’s or lender’s requirements. Minor clerical errors that can be cured through a corrective deed or affidavit are often resolved before insurance is issued. The title company will outline what documentation it needs to remove exceptions from the policy.When the insurer considers a defect material, it may require curative steps to be completed or a court order before issuing standard coverage. Clear communication with the title company early in the process helps identify what remedies are acceptable to underwriters.

Helpful documents include prior deeds, mortgage payoff statements, recorded satisfactions, wills, probate records, and any affidavits previously filed. These records help trace the chain of title and identify the source of defects. Providing contact information for prior owners or known heirs can significantly expedite the resolution process.If records are incomplete, documenting efforts to locate missing instruments or parties is also important. Title professionals and counsel can use this documentation to prepare corrective instruments or support petitions to the court when necessary, reducing uncertainty and accelerating curative steps.

Locating heirs typically starts with reviewing probate files, death certificates, and family records, and may include researching public records and obituaries. An affidavit of heirship may be used where allowed, and witnesses familiar with the family can provide sworn statements. When heirs cannot be located through reasonable effort, legal notice procedures and publication may be required as part of court proceedings.In more complex cases, genealogical research and assistance from specialized researchers can be helpful. Courts consider documented due diligence when evaluating petitions that affect ownership, and proper procedures must be followed to ensure any transfer is legally recognized.

Costs vary widely depending on the nature of the curative work. Simple corrective recordings and documentary preparations have modest fees, while negotiation with lienholders or obtaining recorded releases may add legal and administrative costs. Court actions, such as quiet title suits, involve filing fees, service costs, and potentially greater attorney involvement, increasing overall expense.Estimating costs requires an assessment of the specific defects and likely actions. We provide a clear explanation of expected expenses after reviewing the title report and discussing potential remedies, so clients can weigh the benefits of different approaches before proceeding.

Yes, curative work can affect closing timelines, especially if significant defects are discovered close to a scheduled closing date. Addressing defects early allows corrective instruments to be drafted, signed, and recorded before closing. When issues arise late in the transaction, parties may agree to extend closing dates or put contingencies in place until curative steps are completed.Clear communication with lenders and title companies helps manage expectations. In some cases, temporary solutions like escrow agreements or indemnities can bridge timing gaps, but permanent resolution is often preferable to avoid lingering risk after closing.

A corrective deed specifically fixes an error in a prior recorded deed, such as a mistaken legal description or name, and is drafted to reflect the original intent of the parties. A quitclaim deed transfers whatever interest the grantor may have without warranties. While both can be recorded, a corrective deed is used to clarify or correct prior conveyances, whereas a quitclaim deed is often used to clear potential claims by transferring any possible interest from one party to another with minimal representation of title quality.Choosing the appropriate instrument depends on the facts. Corrective deeds clarify prior records, while quitclaim deeds might be used to remove doubtful claims from a chain of title. The decision should align with the title company’s requirements and the parties’ goals for marketability.

To start a title review in Franklin, obtain the preliminary title report or commitment from the title company and gather any available historical documents related to the property. Contact local counsel or a title professional to review the report for defects and to identify necessary curative steps. Early engagement ensures there is time to address issues before closing and helps coordinate with lenders and insurers.We can review your title report, explain identified exceptions in plain terms, and recommend a practical plan for resolution. Reaching out with the property address and any known recorded documents enables an initial assessment and a clear estimate of likely next steps and timelines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call