Eminent Domain and Condemnation Lawyer Serving Dresden, Tennessee

Comprehensive Guide to Eminent Domain and Condemnation in Dresden

Eminent domain and condemnation actions can significantly impact property owners in Dresden and nearby communities. When a government agency or utility seeks to take land for public use, the process can be confusing and stressful. Our goal is to help property owners understand their rights, evaluate offers, and pursue full and fair compensation when their land or improvements are threatened. Whether you own residential, commercial, or agricultural property, knowing how the process works and what steps to take early can preserve your options and protect your financial interests in the face of a taking.

This guide explains core concepts and practical steps for property owners facing eminent domain or condemnation in Weakley County and Dresden. We cover how takings are initiated, what valuation methods are used, and how negotiations and legal challenges typically unfold. You will also find information about timelines, common pitfalls to avoid, and how to document property losses and damages. With clear information, local property owners can make better decisions when responding to notices, appraisals, and settlement offers from public agencies or private entities acting under condemnation authority.

Why Addressing Eminent Domain Matters for Dresden Property Owners

Addressing an eminent domain action proactively helps property owners preserve value and avoid accepting inadequate compensation. Legal representation ensures that offers are reviewed against fair market value and that all damages and impacts are considered, including severance, relocation costs, and loss of business goodwill when applicable. Engaging early can lead to better settlement outcomes or a stronger position in court if negotiations fail. Property owners in Dresden who take informed action are more likely to receive compensation that reflects the true cost of the taking and the ongoing implications for their remaining property and livelihood.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach in Tennessee

Jay Johnson Law Firm, based in Hendersonville and serving communities like Dresden, focuses on practical, client-centered service for real estate matters including eminent domain and condemnation. We guide clients through each stage of the process, from reviewing initial notices to negotiating settlements and presenting cases in court when necessary. The firm emphasizes clear communication, local knowledge of Tennessee laws, and a results-oriented approach that seeks fair compensation for property owners. Clients receive personalized attention and a plan tailored to their property type, circumstances, and long-term objectives.

Understanding Eminent Domain and the Condemnation Process

Eminent domain allows public entities to acquire private property for public use, subject to the requirement of just compensation under Tennessee law. Condemnation is the formal legal mechanism that effects the taking. The process typically begins with a notice of intent and an offer of compensation, followed by negotiations and, if necessary, filing a condemnation action in court. Property owners should understand the legal standards for public use and compensation and the procedural steps that protect their rights, including opportunities to contest necessity, valuation, or scope of the taking.

Valuation in condemnation cases often involves appraisal of fair market value, consideration of damages to remaining property, and potential compensation for relocation or business interruption. Agencies may present initial offers that do not account for all impacts or legal theories of compensation. Property owners have rights to independent appraisals, to challenge methodology, and to negotiate or litigate for better outcomes. Understanding these elements helps owners respond strategically to offers, preserve evidence, and make informed choices about settlement versus court action.

Definition and Key Concepts in Eminent Domain

Eminent domain is the governmental authority to take private property for public use, conditioned on paying just compensation. The condemnation process is the legal route used to transfer title or permanently occupy property. Public use can include roads, utilities, schools, and other public projects, and sometimes private projects that serve a public purpose. Compensation is intended to place the owner in the position they would have occupied absent the taking, accounting for market value and certain consequential losses. Distinguishing temporary easements from permanent takings is important for determining duration and compensation.

Key Elements and Typical Steps in a Condemnation Case

A typical condemnation matter involves notice and offer, appraisal and valuation, negotiations, and possible litigation if parties cannot agree on compensation or scope. Owners should document property condition, improvements, income impacts, and any costs tied to relocation. Understanding how appraisers select comparables and adjust values is critical, as is recognizing items often overlooked by initial offers. When negotiations stall, condemnation proceedings allow courts to determine necessity and just compensation. Throughout the process, timely responses and organized documentation strengthen an owner’s position and support recovery of a fair award.

Important Terms and Glossary for Condemnation Matters

Familiarity with common terms such as just compensation, fair market value, severance damages, easement, taking, and temporary possession can demystify the condemnation process. Each label has specific legal meaning that influences valuation and remedies. For example, severance damages address how remaining property is affected, while easements may limit use without transferring title. Knowing the definitions helps property owners identify what losses are compensable and prepare evidence that supports a complete valuation. This glossary is a practical reference to help you ask the right questions and review offers more effectively.

Just Compensation

Just compensation refers to the monetary payment required when private property is taken for public use. The goal is to reimburse the property owner for the fair market value of what was taken and, when appropriate, for damages to the remaining property. Calculation can include value of land, structures, loss of income, relocation costs, and diminished access or utility. Determining just compensation often requires appraisals, market analysis, and documentation of any unique impacts. Owners should ensure all relevant losses are considered so the compensation reflects the full effect of the taking.

Severance Damages

Severance damages compensate for the reduction in value of the remainder of a property after a portion has been taken. When a taking cuts off access, reduces usable acreage, or affects visibility and utility, the remainder can lose value independent of what was physically taken. Appraisers assess how the taking changes marketability and function of the remaining parcel, and those losses should be included in calculations. Properly documenting before-and-after conditions and projected impacts on use or income is essential to recover severance damages when appropriate.

Fair Market Value

Fair market value is the estimated price a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the property, neither under compulsion and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. In condemnation cases, appraisers use comparable sales, income capitalization, or cost approaches to estimate value depending on property type. Factors like location, zoning, highest and best use, and condition affect the valuation. Disputes often arise over choice of comparables, adjustments, and assumptions, which is why thorough appraisal review and supporting evidence can improve compensation outcomes.

Temporary Possession and Easements

Temporary possession or construction easements allow a government or authorized party to use private property for a limited time without permanently transferring title. Compensation for temporary takings typically covers loss of use during the period, any physical damage, and restoration costs. Permanent easements grant ongoing rights such as access or utility placement and require compensation based on the impact on property value and use. Distinguishing temporary from permanent impacts and documenting the extent and duration of use are key to securing appropriate payment.

Comparing Limited vs. Comprehensive Approaches in Condemnation Matters

Property owners can pursue a limited approach that focuses on immediate offers and minimal negotiation, or a more comprehensive approach that includes detailed appraisal review, damages analysis, and readiness to litigate. The limited approach may be quicker but can leave unaddressed losses and lead to settlements below full value. A comprehensive approach examines all categories of damage, engages independent valuation, and prepares for hearings or trials if needed. Selecting the right path depends on the scale of the taking, complexity of damages, and the owner’s tolerance for litigation versus prompt resolution.

When a Narrow Response May Be Appropriate:

Small Permanent or Temporary Takes with Minimal Impact

A limited approach can be appropriate when only a small strip of land is taken and the remaining property remains largely unaffected. If the taking does not alter access, utilities, or the highest and best use of the remainder, and the agency’s offer aligns with independent market indications, owners may choose a streamlined response. In such cases, closing a matter quickly can avoid legal fees and uncertainty. However, owners should still document the condition and consult about valuation to confirm the offer reasonably covers any loss of value or restoration expenses.

When Replacement or Restoration Costs Are Minimal

A limited response may also make sense when impacts are temporary and easily restored, such as short-term construction easements where restoration costs are predictable and modest. If the agency agrees to full restoration and provides funds adequate for scope of work, accepting a fair offer may be efficient. Owners should obtain written commitments for restoration and verify that compensation includes any relocation or business disruption costs. Confirming these details prevents unexpected out-of-pocket expenses and ensures the property returns to comparable condition.

Why a Thorough, Comprehensive Response Often Produces Better Results:

Significant or Complex Takings

A comprehensive approach is advisable for significant takings, complex property types, or when multiple damages categories exist. These situations often involve disputed appraisals, severance impacts, or business losses that require detailed valuation and evidence. Taking the time to commission independent appraisals, document before-and-after conditions, and prepare legal arguments can materially increase compensation. When public projects affect large parcels, commercial property, or properties with unique features, a full review and readiness to litigate typically yields a more complete compensation package.

When Long-Term Effects and Future Use Are at Stake

When a taking changes how property can be used or affects future development potential, a comprehensive response helps capture those long-term losses. Compensation should reflect not only the immediate market value but also diminished future opportunities, changes to access, or restrictions caused by easements. Detailed economic analysis and planning records can support claims for these impacts. Preparing a thorough case ensures that compensation accounts for both present and foreseeable future consequences, protecting the owner’s financial position over time.

Benefits of Taking a Full-Spectrum Approach to Condemnation Issues

A comprehensive approach helps ensure all compensable elements are considered, including market value, severance, relocation, business interruption, and restoration. It relies on independent valuation, documentary evidence, and strategic negotiation to maximize recovery. Owners who invest in a detailed review often receive higher settlements or awards that better match their actual losses. This approach also reduces the risk of overlooked damages that can lead to out-of-pocket costs later, and it positions the owner to make informed decisions about settlement versus litigation based on robust financial estimates and legal analysis.

Comprehensive preparation can shorten litigation by clarifying positions and narrowing disputes, as well as improve leverage in negotiations. By assembling clear evidence and professional valuations early, owners can counter incomplete offers and present a persuasive case for appropriate compensation. This process also preserves options, such as pursuing additional claims for damages that arise after initial offers. Overall, a full-spectrum response prioritizes thorough documentation and sound valuation principles to achieve fairer outcomes for property owners confronting condemnation.

More Complete Compensation Recovery

A comprehensive approach improves the chance of recovering all categories of loss, not only the value of the land taken. Proper appraisal and damages analysis capture severance impacts, diminution in marketability, and ancillary costs like relocation or business interruption when applicable. This fuller accounting prevents owners from settling for amounts that only reflect a narrow portion of loss. By documenting the full economic consequences and presenting credible support, owners stand a better chance of obtaining a financial recovery aligned with the real impact of the taking.

Stronger Position in Negotiations and Court

Comprehensive preparation strengthens an owner’s position when negotiating with agencies or appearing before a court. When appraisals, expert reports, and organized documentation are in place, it becomes harder for condemning authorities to undervalue claims or overlook legitimate damages. A persuasive, well-documented presentation can prompt better settlement offers and reduce the likelihood of protracted disputes. This solid foundation also helps owners evaluate offers against realistic benchmarks and make informed decisions about whether to accept terms or pursue litigation.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Practical Tips for Property Owners Facing Condemnation

Document Property Condition and Uses

Start by documenting the current condition and uses of your property with photographs, records of maintenance, leases, and any business income statements if applicable. A detailed record of improvements, access points, and utility connections can help demonstrate value and support claims for severance or loss of use. Keep copies of any communications from the condemning authority and record dates of notices, inspections, and offers. Well-organized documentation improves the credibility of valuation claims and reduces the risk of overlooked compensable losses during negotiations or litigation.

Obtain an Independent Appraisal Early

An independent, well-supported appraisal provides a benchmark against agency offers and highlights adjustments or assumptions that warrant discussion. Early appraisal work allows owners to identify overlooked damages and to craft negotiation strategies that reflect full value. Appraisals tailored to condemnation matters should address before-and-after valuation, severance impacts, and any unique factors affecting marketability. Presenting a credible independent analysis can prompt better settlement offers and prepares the owner to challenge undervalued proposals in court if necessary.

Understand and Preserve Legal Rights and Deadlines

Pay close attention to notices, response deadlines, and procedural requirements tied to condemnation actions. Failing to respond or preserve claims can limit recovery options. Preserve evidence of losses and seek clarification in writing for any offers or proposed easements. Consulting about the legal timeline and statutory deadlines early helps ensure claims are timely asserted and that owners retain rights to negotiate, request appraisal review, or challenge the taking in court. Proactive steps protect options and support a stronger position in dealings with the condemning authority.

Key Reasons Dresden Property Owners Should Consider Legal Guidance

Property owners should consider legal guidance when facing eminent domain because public offers often omit compensable elements and can understate the full impact of a taking. Legal review helps identify overlooked damages like severance, access changes, or business interruption. Attorneys can coordinate independent appraisals, negotiate with agencies, and prepare for litigation if necessary. For many owners, professional assistance increases the likelihood of receiving compensation that aligns with the true economic losses caused by the taking and ensures settlement terms include proper restoration and mitigation measures.

Guidance is also valuable when takings influence future development or long-term property utility. If a partial taking changes the highest and best use of the remainder, or if easements affect future plans, counsel can assess long-term financial impacts and pursue compensation that accounts for future losses. Representation also helps manage communications, document claims, and avoid quick settlements that fail to capture full damages. For Dresden and Weakley County owners, a careful approach preserves rights and can prevent costly consequences from accepting an insufficient offer.

Common Situations That Lead Property Owners to Seek Condemnation Assistance

Common circumstances include government or utility projects such as road widening, pipeline installation, public facility construction, or utility relocations that require land or easements. Private developers acting with condemnation authority for public-purpose projects can also initiate takings. Property owners may face temporary construction access, permanent easements, or full acquisitions. Each scenario brings distinct valuation and mitigation concerns, and owners often engage counsel to make sure offers reflect actual losses and to navigate procedural steps, appraisal challenges, and potential litigation when necessary.

Public Infrastructure Projects

Road improvements, bridge construction, and utility expansions frequently require property acquisitions or easements. These projects often involve multiple parcels and can create complex valuation issues, including severance damages and impacts to access. Property owners may experience changes to traffic patterns, ingress and egress, or usable acreage that affect market value. Legal review helps ensure offers account for these broader consequences and supports negotiations for fair compensation and restoration where appropriate.

Utility and Pipeline Easements

Utilities or pipeline operators may seek temporary or permanent easements to install lines or equipment. Compensation should address the extent of use, duration, and any lasting restrictions on property use. Temporary construction impacts and required restoration work also warrant payment. Owners should confirm the scope of the easement, responsibilities for restoration, and compensation for diminished value, and ensure written agreements reflect both the physical impacts and limitations on future property uses.

Development Projects with Condemnation Authority

Occasionally, private development projects that serve a public purpose proceed with condemnation authority, leading to acquisitions for redevelopment or revitalization. These takings can involve complex valuation questions, such as lost development potential or changes in highest and best use. Owners facing these scenarios should document plans, zoning information, and expected development impacts to present a comprehensive case for appropriate compensation that reflects both present value and lost future opportunities.

Jay Johnson

Local Representation for Eminent Domain Matters in Dresden

Jay Johnson Law Firm provides representation to property owners in Dresden and Weakley County facing condemnation. We assist from the initial notice through settlement or litigation, offering guidance on valuation, documentation, and negotiation strategy. Our role is to protect owner rights, review agency offers, and assemble evidence to support full compensation. By providing clear explanations of options and practical next steps, we help clients understand their position and pursue the most appropriate path given the nature of the taking and the owner’s goals.

Why Dresden Property Owners Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm

Owners choose our firm for a pragmatic approach to eminent domain matters and for focused attention to valuation and damages. We prioritize thorough documentation and timely action to preserve claims. Our team coordinates with appraisers and other professionals to build a strong evidence base and to negotiate from an informed position. Clients receive direct communication, clear explanations of legal options, and guidance about potential outcomes at each stage of the process to make well-informed choices.

We place emphasis on local knowledge of Tennessee condemnation procedures and on producing reliable valuation support that addresses both immediate and long-term impacts. This local perspective helps in evaluating offers and anticipating common agency strategies. Our approach aims to secure compensation that reflects the real costs of the taking, including severance and other consequential damages where appropriate. We work to preserve client rights while pursuing the most efficient and fair resolution available under the circumstances.

Communication and responsiveness are core parts of our client service. Property owners receive practical guidance about deadlines, documentation, and negotiation tactics, and we handle complex interactions with agencies so owners can focus on their daily lives and businesses. When settlement talks require escalation, we prepare thorough case materials for court to seek just compensation. Our focus is on achieving outcomes that protect clients’ financial interests and future property plans in Dresden and across Weakley County.

Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm in Hendersonville at 731-206-9700 for a Free Consultation

How We Handle the Eminent Domain Process for Clients

Our process begins with a review of notices, agency offers, and property records to identify potential claims and damages. We recommend independent appraisals where appropriate and assemble evidence of property condition, use, and income impacts. We negotiate with agencies to seek fair settlements and, when necessary, prepare condemnation litigation with court filings, expert testimony, and thorough documentation. Throughout, we keep clients informed about strategy, risks, timelines, and expected outcomes, and we tailor our approach to the specific nature of each taking.

Step One: Assessment and Documentation

The first step focuses on assessing the notice, initial offer, and the scope of the proposed taking. We gather deeds, surveys, leases, improvement records, and photographs, and we evaluate how the taking will affect present use and future potential. This stage may include ordering an independent appraisal and collecting evidence of any income or business losses. Thorough early documentation strengthens claims for compensation and helps determine whether to pursue negotiation or litigation based on the magnitude of the impact.

Review of Notices and Initial Offers

We carefully review agency notices, offers, and legal descriptions to understand the extent of the taking and the valuation basis. Identifying errors, omissions, or undervaluation in initial offers is common and can guide effective responses. This review determines the scope of appraisal work needed and establishes the factual foundation for negotiations or litigation, ensuring that all compensable elements are considered from the outset.

Document Collection and Evidence Preservation

Assembling deeds, surveys, maintenance records, photos, and business documents is essential to preserve evidence and support valuation claims. We advise clients on which items are most relevant and how to document pre-taking conditions. Early preservation prevents loss of critical information and provides appraisers and legal counsel with the material needed to build a persuasive compensation case.

Step Two: Valuation and Negotiation

In the valuation and negotiation phase, we coordinate independent appraisals, analyze agency appraisals, and identify damages that the initial offer may neglect. We present findings to the condemning authority and negotiate for compensation that reflects full losses. If an acceptable settlement cannot be reached, we prepare for litigation by refining evidence and identifying expert testimony that addresses valuation methodologies and projected economic impacts on the remainder property.

Independent Appraisals and Damage Analysis

Independent appraisals tailored to condemnation matters address before-and-after values, severance damages, and any business or relocation claims. We work with qualified appraisers to ensure appropriate comparables and adjustments are used and that all impacts on value are quantified. A well-supported appraisal is essential to negotiations and to presenting a compelling case if litigation becomes necessary.

Negotiating with Agencies and Attorneys

Armed with appraisal reports and documentation, we engage the condemning authority to pursue a fair resolution. Negotiation may involve presenting technical valuation evidence, correcting methodological errors, and advocating for payment of all compensable items. If discussions do not produce a reasonable offer, preparation shifts toward filing or defending a condemnation case in court while continuing efforts to settle where possible.

Step Three: Litigation and Resolution

When settlement is not achievable, we litigate to protect owner rights and seek just compensation through the court system. Litigation can resolve disputes over necessity, valuation methodologies, and damage categories. We prepare evidence, coordinate expert testimony, and present credible valuations to the court. Even when litigation proceeds, many matters settle during the process, and having a ready case often improves settlement prospects and ensures any final award addresses the full scope of losses.

Preparing Court Filings and Evidence

Preparation for court includes drafting pleadings, assembling appraisals, witness statements, and supporting documentation. We ensure compliance with procedural rules and deadlines, and we develop a coherent presentation of the valuation case. Thorough preparation helps clarify disputed issues and positions the owner to obtain an award that reflects full damages when settlement is unavailable.

Trial Presentation and Post-Judgment Steps

In trial, we present valuation evidence, cross-examine opposing experts, and argue legal standards for compensation. If the verdict or award is reached, post-judgment tasks may include enforcing payment, addressing appeals, or negotiating additional settlement terms. The goal is timely and complete resolution so the owner receives the compensation necessary to address losses and proceed with future property plans.

Frequently Asked Questions About Eminent Domain in Dresden

What is eminent domain and when can property be taken?

Eminent domain is the authority of a public entity to take private property for public use, subject to payment of just compensation. A taking can occur for infrastructure projects like roads, utilities, or public facilities, and sometimes for private developments that serve a public purpose under applicable law. Condemnation is the legal proceeding used to transfer title or permanently occupy property. Owners receive notice and an initial offer, and they have rights to negotiate or challenge necessity and valuation through the courts. When a taking is proposed, owners should carefully review notices and offers, document property condition, and consider obtaining an independent appraisal. Early legal consultation helps identify compensable elements and procedural rights so owners can respond effectively and protect their financial interests throughout the process.

Just compensation is generally based on fair market value and may include additional amounts for severance, relocation, and business interruption where appropriate. Appraisers use comparable sales, income approaches, or cost methods depending on property type and circumstances. The goal is to place the owner in the position they would have been in had the taking not occurred, accounting for both the portion taken and any damages to the remainder. Disputes often focus on choice of comparables, adjustments, and assumptions used by appraisers. Independent appraisals and careful documentation of impacts can support higher compensation. Property owners should obtain well-supported valuations and present evidence to challenge undervalued agency appraisals during negotiation or in court.

Yes, property owners can challenge the necessity or public use justification for a taking in certain circumstances under Tennessee law. Courts examine whether the proposed purpose qualifies as public use and whether the taking is necessary to achieve that objective. Challenging necessity often involves factual and legal arguments and requires timely action in the condemnation proceeding. However, challenging necessity can be complex and may not always succeed, so owners typically weigh the potential benefits and costs. Even when necessity is not successfully contested, focusing on valuation and compensation remains important to ensure full recovery for losses resulting from the taking.

Severance damages compensate for the reduction in value of the remaining property after a portion has been taken. When a taking affects access, visibility, acreage, or the functional use of the remainder, its market value can decline independently of the land actually taken. Appraisers analyze how the taking changes the remainder’s marketability and apply adjustments to reflect that loss. Recovering severance damages requires clear demonstration of before-and-after conditions and credible valuation support. Owners should document property features, planned uses, and any lost development potential to strengthen claims for severance and ensure the full impact is considered in compensation discussions.

No, property owners are not required to accept an agency’s initial offer. Initial offers are often starting points that may not reflect full compensable losses. Owners have the right to review, negotiate, and present independent appraisals or documentation to seek higher compensation. It is common for offers to be improved through informed negotiation or to result in litigation when parties cannot agree. Before accepting, owners should confirm that the offer covers market value, severance damages, restoration, and any relocation or business interruption costs. Consulting about the offer and obtaining valuation support helps ensure the settlement addresses the full scope of losses tied to the taking.

The timeline for a condemnation case varies widely depending on complexity, scope of the taking, and whether parties reach agreement. Simple easements or minor temporary takings can resolve in a matter of weeks to months, while contested permanent condemnations often take many months or longer, especially if litigation, multiple appraisals, or appeals are involved. Unresolved valuation disputes and scheduling of trial dates contribute to longer durations. Proactive work in valuation, negotiation, and documentation can streamline the process and sometimes lead to settlement without protracted litigation. Owners should plan for potential delays but also pursue timely actions to preserve evidence and claims while negotiations or court proceedings move forward.

Yes, owners may be entitled to compensation for temporary construction impacts, including loss of use, damage, and restoration costs. Temporary possession or construction easements should include payment for the period of use and any costs required to return the property to its prior condition. The scope, duration, and specific terms of temporary uses need to be clearly documented to ensure appropriate compensation. Owners should request written terms for restoration and monetary compensation for temporary disruptions, and they should document before-and-after conditions. Including these items in negotiations or agreements helps avoid disputes over restoration responsibility and ensures that temporary impacts do not become uncompensated burdens on the owner.

Helpful documentation includes deeds, surveys, photographs, maintenance records, leases, rental or income statements, and records of improvements or investments in the property. For business owners, profit-and-loss statements, tax returns, and evidence of lost customers can support claims for business interruption or loss of goodwill. Documentation of proposed development plans or zoning approvals can also help show lost future potential when relevant. Organized records make it easier to quantify damages and support independent appraisals. Promptly preserving communications from the condemning authority and capturing dated photos of condition before construction or access changes are especially important for demonstrating loss and supporting compensation claims.

Business losses can be recoverable in condemnation proceedings when the taking or temporary use directly causes demonstrable loss of income, relocation costs, or loss of business goodwill. Demonstrating these losses requires documentation such as financial statements, customer records, and credible projections showing how the taking reduced revenue or increased costs. Appraisers and economic analysts often assist in quantifying these damages for negotiation or litigation. Owners pursuing business loss claims should gather documentation showing historical performance, identify causal links to the taking, and retain economic analysis to support projections. Prepared and supported claims increase the likelihood that business losses will be recognized and compensated in the overall settlement or award.

To discuss a proposed taking in Dresden, contact Jay Johnson Law Firm at 731-206-9700 to schedule a consultation. We will review notices, offers, and property facts and outline practical next steps for protecting your rights. Our initial discussions focus on understanding the scope of the taking and identifying the key valuation and documentation needs for your case. We serve property owners throughout Weakley County and Tennessee, and we can coordinate appraisals and gather necessary records to pursue fair compensation. Prompt contact helps preserve options and ensures timely responses to procedural deadlines associated with condemnation matters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call