Title Review and Curative Work Attorney Serving Westmoreland, Tennessee

Comprehensive Guide to Title Review and Curative Work for Westmoreland Property Transactions

Title review and curative work address defects that could interfere with the transfer, financing, or marketability of real estate in Westmoreland and surrounding areas. This service focuses on identifying issues in public records, deeds, liens, easements, boundary descriptions, or probate matters that may cloud ownership. A careful review helps property owners, buyers, sellers, and lenders understand the legal status of title, evaluate the risks, and take corrective steps to clear title defects. Effective curative work often involves drafting corrective documents, coordinating with county recording offices, and negotiating resolutions with lienholders or other interested parties to restore clear marketable ownership.

When a title problem appears, it can delay or derail a closing and create unexpected out-of-pocket costs. Addressing concerns early in the transaction reduces surprises at closing and helps protect long-term property rights. Curative work may include preparing affidavits, facilitating quitclaim deeds, resolving tax or judgment liens, or clarifying ambiguous property descriptions. The goal is to put the property into a transferrable condition so that buyers feel secure and lenders can proceed with financing. A thorough title review also documents the chain of ownership and highlights any future steps required to prevent similar issues from recurring.

Why Title Review and Curative Work Matter for Property Transactions

A proactive title review identifies risks that could affect a buyer’s ability to take clear ownership or a seller’s ability to convey property without legal obstacles. Curative work protects value, prevents post-closing disputes, and reduces the likelihood of costly litigation. Clearing a title might improve marketability and can be essential for qualifying for financing. For sellers, it reduces the chance of last-minute hold-ups; for buyers, it provides peace of mind that the property they are acquiring does not carry hidden claims. The benefit is a smoother closing and a documented pathway to resolving recorded defects and ambiguities in ownership records.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm’s Title Review and Curative Work Services

Jay Johnson Law Firm serves Westmoreland, Hendersonville, and the region of Tennessee with practical legal support for real estate transactions and title problems. The firm assists clients by performing detailed searches of county records, interpreting relevant documents, and preparing the necessary instruments to correct defects. Communication is prioritized so clients understand the nature of any issues, realistic timelines, and the likely steps to clear title. The firm also coordinates with title companies, lenders, and other parties to facilitate prompt resolution and to reduce delays in the sale or financing processes.

Understanding Title Review and Curative Work: Scope and Purpose

A title review is a methodical examination of recorded documents to verify ownership history and identify encumbrances, easements, restrictions, or inconsistencies that could affect a property. Curative work follows when defects are found and encompasses the legal and administrative measures necessary to fix those defects. This can involve drafting corrective deeds, obtaining releases, recording affidavits to clarify facts, or negotiating payoff arrangements with lienholders. The objective is to ensure that the public record accurately reflects an owner’s rights and that there are no unresolved claims that would impair marketable title.

Not all title issues require lengthy intervention; some can be resolved with simple recordings or corrective documents, while others may require more involved coordination among multiple parties. Determining the appropriate curative path depends on the type of defect, the parties involved, and the county recording practices. Effective curative work requires attention to detail in drafting, clear communication with third parties, and timely recording of corrective instruments. The result should be a clear chain of title and documented proof that any prior barrier to transfer has been addressed according to Tennessee law and local procedures.

Defining Title Review and Curative Work

Title review is the systematic inspection of recorded documents and related records to trace ownership and identify legal matters affecting real property. Curative work refers to the steps taken to remove defects that are discovered during that review. These steps may include preparing corrective deeds, obtaining releases from lienholders, filing affidavits to resolve clerical errors, and coordinating probate-related title issues. The aim is to restore clarity to the ownership record so that the property can be transferred or financed without lingering doubts. Both processes protect the interests of buyers, sellers, and lenders by clarifying legal rights and obligations.

Key Elements and Typical Processes in Title Curative Services

Common elements include a full search of county records, identification of recorded liens and encumbrances, review of deed chains, and verification of probate or personal representative documentation when applicable. The process often begins with a written summary of findings and recommended steps to clear title. Curative actions may include preparing and recording instruments, negotiating lien releases, or collaborating with title insurers to obtain commitments that outline remaining requirements. Each matter requires tailored measures based on the recorded facts, and timely communication with title companies and county clerks helps ensure that corrective recordings are accepted and effective.

Key Terms and Glossary for Title Review and Curative Work

Understanding common terminology makes it easier to follow the review and curative process. Terms such as lien, encumbrance, easement, quiet title, cloud on title, and chain of title frequently appear in documents and discussions. Knowing what each term means clarifies why certain corrective steps are proposed and helps property owners make informed decisions. This section defines terms in plain language and explains how each concept can impact a real estate transaction. Clear definitions support better planning for curative steps and reduce surprises during closing.

Chain of Title

Chain of title refers to the sequential history of ownership recorded in public records for a particular parcel. It shows how property ownership has transferred from one person or entity to another over time. A complete and unbroken chain supports the current owner’s claim, while gaps or inconsistent instruments can create a cloud on title that may require corrective measures. Curative work often begins with reconstructing the chain of title to identify where an error or omission occurred and to determine what documents or actions are needed to restore a clear record of ownership that the market and lenders will accept.

Cloud on Title

A cloud on title is any claim, lien, or irregularity that casts doubt on the validity of ownership or could interfere with a transfer. Clouds can arise from unresolved liens, missing signatures on historic deeds, ambiguous legal descriptions, or pending probate matters. Identifying a cloud triggers curative steps, which may include corrective deeds, releases, affidavits, or court proceedings to quiet title. Removing a cloud restores confidence for buyers and lenders, reduces the risk of future disputes, and typically involves recording clear, properly executed documents that resolve the underlying issue in the public record.

Lien Release

A lien release is a recorded document that shows a creditor has satisfied its security interest against a property and no longer claims a lien. Releases are commonly required to clear a title when mortgages, tax liens, judgment liens, or other encumbrances appear in the records. Obtaining a proper release may involve confirming payoff amounts, negotiating settlements, or requesting a formal release from the lienholder. Recording the release in the correct county recorder’s office is essential so that the public record accurately reflects the absence of that encumbrance and the property can be conveyed free of that particular claim.

Curative Deed

A curative deed is a corrective transfer instrument prepared to fix defects in an earlier deed or to clarify ownership interests. Examples include quitclaim deeds to remove a former owner’s interest, corrective deeds to rectify a scrivener’s error, or deeds reconveying title for clarification. The document must be properly executed and recorded to be effective. Curative deeds are a practical mechanism to remove certain clouds without resorting to court action, though some matters may still require judicial proceedings to achieve a fully marketable title depending on the nature of the defect.

Comparing Limited and Comprehensive Curative Approaches

When a title problem arises, parties can choose targeted, limited curative steps or a comprehensive approach that addresses multiple potential defects. A limited approach focuses on a single, straightforward issue and may be faster and less costly when the defect is obvious and uncontested. A comprehensive approach involves a broader review and often multiple corrective actions to ensure no other hidden encumbrances remain. The choice depends on the nature of defects, timeline pressures, and risk tolerance. This comparison helps clients weigh cost, speed, and the degree of assurance desired before closing or refinancing a property.

When a Targeted Curative Action Is Appropriate:

Simple Recording Errors or Missing Signatures

A limited curative approach is often sufficient when a defect arises from a minor recording error, a missing signature, or a clerical mistake that is straightforward to correct. In such cases, preparing a corrective deed, obtaining a signature affidavit, or filing a properly executed instrument can resolve the issue quickly. This path minimizes cost and administrative burden because the defect is factual, confined, and uncontested. The party seeking the correction must ensure the corrective instrument is recorded in the correct jurisdiction to restore confidence in the chain of title and allow the transaction to proceed.

Single Lien That Can Be Released

A limited approach may be appropriate when the only defect is a single lien that can be satisfied or released without broader investigation. This often occurs when a mortgage or judgment has been paid but the release was not recorded, or when a creditor agrees to sign a release after a negotiated payoff. In these instances, obtaining and recording the release resolves the cloud and restores marketability. The process typically involves confirming payoff amounts, securing the creditor’s signature, and recording the release, which is more efficient than undertaking a full title reconstruction.

When a Comprehensive Curative Strategy Is Recommended:

Complex Chains of Title or Multiple Defects

A comprehensive approach is advisable when multiple defects exist across the chain of title or when historic conveyances show gaps, inconsistent descriptions, or potential competing claims. Resolving these issues may require reconstructing ownership history, preparing a series of corrective instruments, and coordinating with multiple parties. When several document errors and potential encumbrances are present, a broader strategy reduces the chance that an overlooked issue will surface later. The comprehensive path creates a clear and cohesive record, which benefits future buyers and lenders and minimizes long-term risk related to the property.

Probate or Heirship Matters Requiring Multiple Actions

Probate-related title problems and matters involving heirs may necessitate a comprehensive plan because they often touch on multiple recorded instruments and legal processes. When property is conveyed through intestate succession, or when heirs are missing or disputes arise over inheritances, resolving title may require obtaining probate documents, preparing deeds from personal representatives, or pursuing court orders to clarify ownership. A comprehensive approach gathers all relevant records, coordinates filings, and, where necessary, pursues judicial relief to produce a stable and marketable ownership record that supports future transactions and financing.

Benefits of a Thorough Title Review and Curative Strategy

A comprehensive curative strategy reduces the chance of lingering defects that could result in later disputes or unexpected expenses. By addressing multiple potential issues at once, clients can avoid recurring disruptions and have greater confidence when selling, refinancing, or leveraging property. The thorough process ensures that recorded instruments accurately reflect ownership and that any necessary corrective documents are in place and properly recorded. For lenders and buyers, the additional assurance can facilitate smoother underwriting and faster closings, since fewer unresolved items remain to be addressed prior to transfer.

Comprehensive curative work also helps preserve property value and reduces legal exposure over time. When issues are resolved proactively, owners are less likely to face claims from unknown parties or title challenges years later. Clear records improve resale prospects and can make title insurance more straightforward to obtain. The method provides a documented plan and outcome for each corrective step, creating a record of actions taken to secure marketable title. This reliability benefits sellers seeking clean transfers and buyers who want assurance that their ownership interest will hold up under scrutiny.

Improved Marketability and Financing Options

Addressing title defects through a comprehensive review enhances a property’s marketability, making transactions more attractive to potential buyers and lenders. Lenders are more likely to move forward with underwriting when the public record shows a clear chain of ownership and properly recorded releases. Buyers gain confidence that the property will not carry hidden claims that could affect their use or investment. By taking preventative steps and formally recording corrective documents, owners help ensure smoother negotiations and fewer impediments during closing, which can save time and reduce transaction costs overall.

Long-Term Protection of Property Rights

Clearing title through a full curative plan provides long-term protection by minimizing the risk of future disputes or claims against ownership. When every recorded defect is addressed and corrected instruments are carefully documented, the resulting public record provides reliable evidence of ownership for years to come. This stability protects owners from unexpected claims by distant heirs, lienholders, or parties asserting prior interests. Consistent recordkeeping and proper filings also make it easier to manage future transactions, estate planning matters, or refinancing by presenting a clean and defensible title history to interested parties.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Practical Tips for Navigating Title Review and Curative Work

Begin the title review early in the transaction

Starting a title review early in the purchase or sale process reduces the chance that issues will delay closing. Early action allows time to investigate recorded documents thoroughly, communicate with third parties, and prepare any corrective instruments that must be executed and recorded. It also gives buyers and lenders time to review findings and incorporate any necessary curative steps into the contract timeline. Proactive timing helps avoid rushed filings and supports clearer planning around payoffs, releases, or additional documentation that may be required by county recording offices.

Gather full documentation about prior transfers and encumbrances

Collecting deed records, mortgage payoffs, probate letters, and prior surveys can speed the curative process by ensuring everyone has access to the same documentation. When documents are readily available, it is easier to identify the precise source of a defect and determine the appropriate corrective instrument. Accurate records reduce repeated requests for information and support efficient drafting of corrective deeds, affidavits, or release forms. A well-organized file also simplifies coordination with title companies and county officials tasked with accepting and recording curative documents.

Coordinate with title companies and county recording offices

Maintaining open communication with the title company and the county recorder’s office helps ensure that curative documents meet local requirements and are recorded correctly. Different counties may have varying practices for indexation, recording fees, and required signatures, so early verification prevents rejections or delays. Title providers can also advise about remaining exceptions that need resolution and confirm when recorded releases or corrective instruments satisfy underwriting conditions. Timely coordination helps move transactions forward and reduces last-minute surprises at closing.

Why Westmoreland Property Owners Should Consider Title Review and Curative Work

Title issues can surface unexpectedly during closings, refinancing, or when preparing to sell property. Conducting a proactive title review and addressing defects through curative work protects transactions from delay and reduces the potential for post-closing disputes. Property owners who take this step gain clarity on outstanding liens, ambiguous deed language, or historic recording errors. By resolving these matters in advance, owners safeguard the value of their asset and make future transactions more predictable for buyers and lenders. This forward-looking approach is useful whether you are selling, buying, or refinancing in Westmoreland.

Sellers benefit from addressing title defects to avoid last-minute hold-ups, while buyers obtain assurance that the conveyed property will not carry undisclosed claims. Lenders require clear records before extending credit, and title issues can prevent loan funding. Addressing matters before closing reduces stress and unexpected costs for all parties. Additionally, curative work can resolve long-standing uncertainties tied to probate, easements, or prior conveyances, creating a more stable ownership record that supports future planning, estate matters, or sale preparation in Sumner County and the surrounding region.

Common Situations That Lead to Title Review and Curative Work

Title concerns often emerge from missing or incorrect signatures on historic deeds, unresolved mortgage payoffs, outstanding tax or judgment liens, ambiguity in legal descriptions, or probate matters involving heirs. Boundary disputes revealed by surveys or previously unrecorded easements may also require corrective actions. Real estate closings, refinances, or estate settlements are common triggers for a detailed title review that reveals such issues. Once identified, curative work is tailored to the specific problem, whether that means preparing corrective instruments, obtaining releases, or coordinating probate documentation to establish clear ownership.

Missing or Incorrectly Executed Deeds

Historic deeds with missing signatures, incorrect notary acknowledgments, or clerical errors in grantor/grantee names can cloud title and prevent conveyance. Correcting these matters typically involves preparing corrective deeds, affidavits of identity, or obtaining remedial signatures from interested parties. The corrective instruments must be properly signed, witnessed, and recorded in the correct county to ensure they become part of the public record. Addressing these defects protects the chain of title and ensures that the present owner’s interest is accurately documented for future transactions or financing.

Unreleased Mortgages or Judgment Liens

Situations where a mortgage or judgment has been paid but no release appears in the public record are common and typically resolvable through a recorded release. Confirming payoff evidence and securing the creditor’s written release allows the lien to be removed from the title record. If the lienholder is unavailable, alternative curative paths may include negotiated settlements, affidavits, or court filings to obtain a recorded release. Timely removal of these encumbrances helps clear the title and facilitates sales or refinancing without unexpected complications.

Probate and Heirship Issues

When property transfers through an estate, incomplete probate records or disputed heirship can leave ownership uncertain. Resolving these issues may require obtaining probate orders, preparing deeds from the estate’s personal representative, or pursuing judicial clarification of heirship rights. Proper documentation must be recorded to reflect the estate’s transfer of property to heirs or beneficiaries. Addressing probate-related defects ensures that the title record accurately reflects the rightful owner and prevents future claims that could affect resale, financing, or family property planning.

Jay Johnson

Local Title Review and Curative Services in Westmoreland

Jay Johnson Law Firm provides targeted assistance in Westmoreland and the surrounding communities for title review and curative matters related to real estate. The firm guides clients through record searches, explains recorded exceptions, recommends appropriate corrective steps, and prepares documents for recording. Clients receive clear communication about timelines, potential costs, and the likely outcome of proposed curative actions. The goal is to resolve title obstacles efficiently so that property transactions can proceed without undue delay and owners can maintain reliable ownership records in Sumner County and Tennessee.

Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Title Review and Curative Work

Choosing local legal assistance provides the advantage of familiarity with county recording practices and the common title issues in the region. Jay Johnson Law Firm brings practical experience handling the kinds of defects that frequently arise in Westmoreland and nearby counties. The approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough record review, and timely follow-up with recording offices and third parties. Clients benefit from personalized attention to their matters and a focus on practical resolutions that advance closings and preserve property value for sellers, buyers, and lenders alike.

Engaging legal support helps ensure corrective documents are properly drafted, executed, and recorded to withstand future scrutiny. The firm works with title companies and lenders to address underwriting conditions and to make sure all required releases and instruments are obtained. This coordination minimizes the risk of rejected recordings or incomplete cures that can cause additional delay. Clear written summaries of findings and recommended steps help clients make informed decisions about the appropriate curative path and associated timing for their transactions.

For clients who prefer proactive resolution, the firm develops a plan that anticipates common obstacles and lays out the sequence of actions needed to restore a clear public record. Whether the need is limited or comprehensive, the firm explains the options, expected timeline, and potential routes to finalizing curative work. This practical guidance helps property owners, lenders, and prospective buyers navigate the procedural steps and ensures that corrective filings are completed accurately and recorded in the appropriate county offices.

Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Start Clearing Title Issues in Westmoreland

How Title Review and Curative Work Progresses at Our Firm

The process typically begins with an intake to gather property details, deed history, and any documents the client has. A thorough search of county records follows to identify recorded matters affecting title. After assembling the findings, the firm prepares a written summary and recommends a curative strategy, explaining likely steps and estimated timing. When corrective documents are needed, the firm drafts instruments, secures signatures, and coordinates recording with the local county office. Throughout, the firm maintains communication with the title company and other parties to keep the matter moving toward resolution.

Step One: Initial Review and Record Search

The initial step involves collecting available documents and conducting a thorough search of public records to trace ownership history and locate liens, mortgages, easements, and other encumbrances. This includes examining deed chains, judgments, tax records, and probate filings as necessary. The goal is to develop an accurate picture of recorded issues that could affect marketability. This careful review identifies the specific defects and helps determine whether a simple corrective filing will suffice or if a broader curative plan is required to restore a clear title.

Gathering Documents and Client Information

Clients are asked to provide deeds, mortgage payoff statements, recent title commitments if available, and any correspondence about liens or claims. Having these materials speeds up the record search and provides context for evaluating potential defects. The firm reviews the paperwork to confirm legal descriptions, prior transfers, and any recorded exceptions noted by a title company. Accurate client-provided documentation reduces the need for repeated requests and helps produce a focused plan to correct specific defects.

County Records Examination and Issue Identification

A detailed examination of county records identifies recorded liens, incomplete conveyances, or other items that create clouds on title. The review considers historical instruments that could impact present ownership and checks for required releases or affidavits. Findings are compiled into a summary that explains each defect and suggests possible corrective actions. This targeted analysis forms the foundation for drafting curative instruments or pursuing further documentation from third parties to restore a clear chain of title.

Step Two: Preparing Curative Documents and Outreach

Following the initial review, the firm drafts necessary curative documents such as corrective deeds, affidavits, or release requests. Outreach to lienholders, heirs, or other interested parties may be required to obtain signatures or agreements. When payoffs are necessary, the firm assists in confirming amounts and negotiating terms as permitted. The objective in this phase is to assemble the correct signed instruments for recording and to ensure each document meets local recording requirements so the cure will be accepted by county offices and recognized by title companies and lenders.

Drafting Corrective Instruments

Drafting involves preparing deeds, affidavits, releases, or other documents tailored to the identified defects. Each instrument is reviewed for accuracy in legal descriptions, parties, and execution requirements. The firm ensures that documents are consistent with Tennessee recording standards and that they address the specific irregularity found in the chain of title. Proper drafting reduces the likelihood of rejection by the recorder’s office and supports a durable correction that addresses the root cause of the title problem.

Negotiation and Coordination with Third Parties

Securing the cooperation of lienholders, parties named in prior conveyances, or heirs may require negotiation or coordination. The firm communicates with these parties to obtain releases, signatures, or agreements necessary to clear title. When a creditor demands payoff documentation, the firm helps verify amounts and progress toward resolution. Successful coordination reduces delays in acquiring the signed curative instruments and supports prompt recording so that the transaction can proceed to closing with minimal disruption.

Step Three: Recording and Final Confirmation

Once curative documents are signed, the final phase is recording the instruments in the appropriate county office. Proper recording formalizes the corrections and updates the public record. After recording, the firm reviews the records to confirm that the instruments have been accepted and that the title reflects the intended corrections. The firm then provides clients with documentation showing the completed recordings and explains any remaining items the title company or lender may require prior to funding or closing the transaction.

Recording Procedures and Acceptance Checks

Recording requires attention to county guidelines for document format, signature acknowledgment, indexing, and fees. The firm ensures submissions comply with these requirements to avoid rejection or delays. After recording, a review confirms that the instruments are properly indexed to the parcel and parties, and that releases or corrective deeds appear in the official records. This verification step gives clients confidence that the curative work achieved its intended result in the public record.

Post-Recording Follow-Up with Title Companies and Lenders

Following recording, the firm coordinates with the title company and lender to confirm that all underwriting exceptions have been cleared and that the transaction can proceed to closing or funding. If additional documentation is requested, the firm addresses those items promptly. Delivering clear recorded instruments and a summary of actions taken helps finalize the title insurance process and supports a smooth closing. Ongoing communication ensures that clients and their settlement agents understand the status and any final steps required.

Frequently Asked Questions About Title Review and Curative Work

What is the difference between title review and curative work?

Title review is the initial examination of recorded documents and other public records to determine the chain of ownership and to identify encumbrances, easements, liens, or recording errors that might impair marketability. It produces a written summary of findings that outlines defects, exceptions, and recommended actions. A thorough review explains why a curative response might be needed and helps prioritize the issues that most urgently affect closing or financing.Curative work refers to the corrective steps taken after a title review identifies issues. These steps may include drafting corrective deeds, securing lien releases, preparing affidavits, or coordinating with parties to resolve disputes. Curative work focuses on producing properly executed and recorded documents that remove clouds on title, and it may involve negotiation with third parties or coordination with county recording offices to ensure the public record accurately reflects ownership rights.

Timing varies depending on the complexity of the defects identified, the number of parties involved, and the responsiveness of third parties such as lienholders or heirs. Simple issues, like recording a missed release or filing a corrective deed, can be resolved in a matter of weeks if required signatures are readily available and county recording offices process documents promptly. The timeframe also depends on title company underwriting needs and any scheduling constraints for signings and filings.More complex matters, such as those requiring probate documentation, locating multiple heirs, or negotiating with distant lienholders, can take several months. The firm provides realistic estimates after the initial review and keeps clients informed about anticipated steps and timelines. Early action and clear documentation tend to shorten the overall schedule, while contested or hard-to-locate parties extend it.

Costs depend on the nature and scope of the curative work required. Simple corrective filings or recording a release often entail modest fees for document preparation and recording charges. When multiple instruments are needed, or negotiations and extended outreach to lienholders are required, overall costs increase. The firm provides transparent billing information and can discuss fee arrangements after assessing the record and recommended curative steps.Additional costs may include county recording fees, title company requirements, and any payments required to satisfy outstanding liens where possible. When litigation or court filings are necessary, those matters carry separate costs associated with filing, service, and court time. The firm outlines anticipated fees and disbursements so that clients can make informed decisions about pursuing either limited or comprehensive curative paths.

Not every title defect requires court intervention. Many issues are resolvable through properly drafted and recorded corrective documents, release agreements, or affidavits that address the specific recording error or lien. When third parties agree to sign releases or corrective instruments, the process proceeds administratively through recordings and does not require litigation. This administrative path is often faster and less costly when parties are cooperative and documentation is available.Court action becomes necessary when there are competing claims that cannot be resolved by agreement, missing or unknown heirs whose consent cannot be obtained, or when a definitive judicial determination is needed to quiet title. In such cases, pursuing a judicial remedy may be the only path to achieve a marketable title. The firm advises on the likely necessity of court proceedings after the initial review and discusses alternatives where available.

Helpful documents include any deeds you possess, recent title commitments or insurance policies, mortgage payoff statements, property tax bills, surveys, and probate or estate documents if the property passed through an estate. These items provide context and can speed the review by giving the reviewer direct evidence of prior transfers and recorded encumbrances. If you have correspondence related to liens or prior closings, include that as well for a more complete picture.If you lack documents, the firm can still perform a public records search, but having client-provided documents reduces the time needed to reconstruct the chain of title and helps identify precise instruments that require curative action. Providing accurate parcel identification information and any historical records you have increases the efficiency and effectiveness of the review process.

Many types of liens and claims can be removed through curative work, including recorded mortgages that have been paid but not released, judgment liens where release agreements can be obtained, and clerical errors corrected by affidavit or corrective deeds. When creditors cooperate or when payoff documentation is available, recording a release or reconveyance typically clears the recorded encumbrance. Properly executed curative instruments then support a clear public record for future transactions.However, some claims may be more complicated, particularly if ownership is contested, parties cannot be located, or statutory requirements for certain releases are not met. In such circumstances, alternative routes such as negotiated settlements or judicial proceedings may be required. The firm evaluates each matter and recommends the most practicable path to address the specific type of lien or claim identified in the title review.

Curative work directly affects the ability to close and obtain financing because lenders and title insurers require a clear or insurable title before funding a loan. If underwriting exceptions exist, curative steps must be completed and documented so the lender can proceed. Timely curative work prevents last-minute surprises that could delay funding or cause a closing to be postponed until releases and corrective documents are recorded.Close coordination with the title company and lender is essential. Once the curative documents are recorded and the title company confirms the public record reflects those corrections, lenders typically proceed with underwriting and funding. Proactive curative work reduces the likelihood of contingencies remaining at closing and supports smoother transaction completion without lender-imposed delays.

When a necessary party cannot be located, there are several possible approaches depending on the circumstances. One option is documented, good-faith efforts to locate the person followed by affidavits attesting to those attempts, which may satisfy certain recording or title company requirements. Another approach may involve negotiated settlements with known interested parties, or leveraging alternative instruments to limit the impact of the missing party on marketability.In some cases, pursuing a judicial remedy such as a declaratory judgment or quiet title action may be required to obtain a court order that clears the title despite an absent party. The firm evaluates the best path forward based on the nature of the missing party’s interest, the likelihood of locating them, and the client’s objectives, recommending the most practical route to restore record clarity.

While clients may communicate with title companies, the firm typically handles coordination to ensure curative documents meet underwriting standards and recording requirements. This reduces the risk of rejected filings or miscommunication between parties. The firm can liaise with the title company to confirm outstanding exceptions, confirm allowable curative instruments, and verify when recorded documents have satisfied underwriting conditions.Client involvement remains important for providing necessary documents, signing instruments, and authorizing actions. The firm works collaboratively with clients and title providers to keep everyone informed about steps taken and to make sure the transaction progresses toward closing with minimal disruption. This shared responsibility helps ensure efficiency and clarity throughout the curative process.

To begin, contact Jay Johnson Law Firm with basic property information and any documents you possess, such as deeds or title commitments. The firm will gather needed details, perform a public records search, and provide a written summary of findings explaining the identified defects and recommended curative steps. This initial assessment clarifies likely timelines and potential costs so you can make an informed decision about moving forward.After you approve a recommended plan, the firm drafts the necessary curative instruments, coordinates with required parties, obtains signatures, and handles recording with the county office. Throughout the matter, the firm keeps you informed about progress, recording confirmations, and any further steps needed to finalize the title clearance and complete your transaction smoothly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call