A Practical Guide to Eminent Domain and Condemnation in Lakeland
When the government or a utility seeks to take private land for public use, property owners in Lakeland face complex legal and financial choices. Eminent domain and condemnation proceedings can affect home owners, landowners, and small business operators alike. Our page explains how these takings work, what rights property owners have under Tennessee law, and how to respond to offers and filings. Understanding the process early helps owners make informed decisions about negotiations, valuation, and potential litigation. Jay Johnson Law Firm serves clients from Lakeland and the surrounding Shelby County area with focused representation in real estate takings.
Facing a condemnation notice or an initial offer can feel overwhelming, but timely action matters. Property owners should collect documentation, obtain reliable valuations, and understand the timeline for challenging an acquisition. Our firm assists clients by reviewing offers, identifying legal and factual issues that affect value, and communicating with the condemning authority on the owner’s behalf. We provide clear explanations of potential outcomes and likely next steps, including negotiation strategies and when a court hearing may be necessary. Call Jay Johnson Law Firm at 731-206-9700 to discuss your situation and preserve your options under Tennessee law.
Why Addressing Eminent Domain Early Benefits Property Owners
Responding promptly and knowledgeably to a proposed taking can significantly affect the compensation you receive and your long term options. Effective representation helps ensure valuation considers all relevant factors, such as loss of business income, relocation impacts, and severance damages when only part of a parcel is acquired. Legal guidance also protects procedural rights like notice and the right to challenge the necessity of the taking in limited circumstances. For many owners, a well prepared response leads to better settlement terms and preserves rights to pursue additional remedies if the initial offer is inadequate.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Condemnation Matters
Jay Johnson Law Firm represents property owners across Tennessee, including Lakeland and nearby Hendersonville, in real estate and condemnation matters. The firm focuses on clear communication, thorough investigation, and practical advocacy tailored to each client’s property and goals. We help clients gather valuation evidence, prepare responses to offers, and navigate administrative or court procedures when necessary. The firm emphasizes client education so owners understand the legal standards, compensation components, and timing involved in eminent domain processes. We are available to discuss initial questions and next steps by phone or in person.
Understanding Eminent Domain and the Condemnation Process
Eminent domain is the power that allows governmental entities and certain utilities to acquire private property for public use, but only with just compensation. Condemnation is the formal legal process used to take title or obtain an easement when a voluntary agreement cannot be reached. Property owners should know that an initial offer from the condemning authority is often a starting point, not necessarily the full measure of compensation available. Understanding how value is calculated, what damages may be claimed, and the deadlines for responses is essential to protecting financial interests throughout the acquisition.
During condemnation proceedings, several interlocutory steps can affect outcomes, including appraisals, negotiation conferences, and possible court filings to determine value or challenge procedural defects. Owners may be entitled to compensation for the market value of land taken, diminished value of remaining property, and certain relocation or business losses under applicable statutes. Engagement with the condemning authority and with valuation professionals early in the process helps owners preserve claims and documentation that support higher compensation. Timely legal review of offers and filings ensures procedural rights under Tennessee law are protected.
Defining Key Concepts: Eminent Domain Versus Condemnation
Eminent domain refers to the inherent power of governments and certain public agencies to take private property for public use, subject to payment of just compensation. Condemnation is the legal mechanism that implements that power when acquisition cannot be achieved through voluntary agreement. Not every government request results in a court ordered taking, but where condemnation is initiated the property owner receives formal notice and an opportunity to contest valuation or certain procedural aspects. Knowing these distinctions helps owners evaluate offers and determine whether to pursue negotiation or challenge the taking through legal channels.
Key Elements and Typical Steps in a Condemnation Matter
A typical condemnation matter involves several interconnected elements, beginning with notice and valuation, followed by negotiation and possible filing of a condemnation petition. Appraisals and valuation reports frame the initial offers, while title review, survey work, and documentation of property use inform compensation claims. If parties do not agree, the matter may proceed to a court hearing or administrative process where judges determine fair market value and additional damages. Post judgment issues can include distribution of proceeds and filings to address severance damages for remaining property. Each step requires careful scheduling and evidence preservation.
Glossary of Common Eminent Domain Terms
A basic glossary helps demystify technical language used by condemning authorities and valuation professionals. Terms like market value, severance damages, temporary easement, and relocation benefits frequently appear in offers and reports. Understanding these concepts allows owners to evaluate whether an offer fairly compensates for both the portion taken and the impact on remaining property. The glossary on this page defines commonly used words and phrases in accessible language so property owners can follow appraisal reports and legal notices without confusion, and prepare informed questions for their legal counsel.
Condemnation
Condemnation is the formal legal process used to acquire private property for public use when voluntary sale is not achieved. It typically begins with a petition or declaration from a governmental authority or utility seeking to take title or an easement. The process includes notice to affected owners, valuation steps to determine compensation, and legal procedures that may conclude with a court order transferring title in exchange for payment. Owners may participate by submitting valuation evidence, negotiating settlements, or requesting hearings to contest valuation or procedural matters under applicable Tennessee rules.
Just Compensation
Just compensation is the monetary payment required by law to make a property owner whole when private land is taken for public use. It is designed to reflect the fair market value of what is taken, and where applicable, additional damages such as loss of use, decreased value to remaining property, and documented relocation expenses. Determining just compensation often involves appraisal reports, market data, comparable sales, and consideration of unique property characteristics. Owners should ensure appraisals consider all relevant factors that affect value to secure a complete and appropriate payment.
Eminent Domain
Eminent domain is the legal authority vested in government entities and certain private entities acting for public purposes to acquire private property for public use. This power is balanced by constitutional and statutory protections requiring that owners receive just compensation and due process. Not all proposals by a public authority lead to an immediate taking, and there are procedural steps intended to protect owners, including notice and opportunities to negotiate and contest valuation. Understanding the scope and limits of eminent domain helps owners respond effectively to acquisition efforts.
Inverse Condemnation
Inverse condemnation occurs when property is effectively taken or damaged by government action without an express formal taking; the property owner then seeks compensation by filing a claim against the government. Examples include flooding caused by public works, utility failures, or regulatory actions that deprive an owner of use or value. Inverse condemnation claims require documentation of the governmental action and proof of loss or diminished value. Pursuing such claims often involves complex factual and legal analysis to establish causation and appropriate compensation.
Comparing Limited Advice Versus Full Representation in Condemnation Matters
Property owners have choices about how to engage legal resources when facing a taking. A limited engagement might include a document review, a valuation opinion, or advice about an offer, while full representation covers negotiation, preparation of evidentiary packages, and court advocacy when necessary. The right approach depends on the complexity of the taking, the stakes involved, and the owner’s comfort handling technical valuation issues. Owners should weigh the potential increase in compensation available through sustained advocacy against the costs and timeline of pursuing more extensive legal services.
When Limited Legal Assistance May Be Appropriate:
Clear, Fair Initial Offers
A limited approach can make sense when the condemning authority’s offer is transparent, market data supports the proposed payment, and the taking is minor with little or no impact on the remaining property. In straightforward transactions where comparable sales and standard valuation methods align with the offer, owners may only need a concise review and guidance on negotiation tactics. Even in these scenarios, having documentation reviewed by counsel helps avoid waiving rights and ensures that any settlement addresses all compensable elements under Tennessee law.
Undisputed Market Value
If market value for the property type is well established and the taking does not change the highest and best use of the remaining land, a limited engagement that verifies comparables and confirms the offer can be appropriate. Owners should ensure that the review addresses potential severance damages and any temporary access issues. A focused assessment helps confirm whether accepting an offer is reasonable or whether further negotiation could improve terms. Even limited assistance often prevents procedural missteps that could reduce compensation eligibility.
Why a Comprehensive Legal Response May Be Needed:
Complex Valuation and Unique Property Characteristics
A comprehensive approach is often required when the property has unique features, multiple income streams, specialized improvements, or unusual zoning or use considerations that complicate valuation. Such cases typically demand independent appraisals, testimony, and a coordinated presentation of evidence to establish full compensation. Complex takings may also involve business interruption claims or relocation costs that require detailed documentation. Comprehensive representation helps ensure all elements of loss are identified, quantified, and presented persuasively during negotiations or at hearing.
Procedural Challenges and Title or Access Issues
When a taking involves disputed ownership, easement conflicts, or questions about the authority’s procedures, a full-service approach that includes title examination, survey review, and litigation readiness is appropriate. Procedural errors by the condemning authority can affect liability and compensation, and addressing these issues may require motions, evidence development, and court appearances. Comprehensive representation is designed to protect an owner’s legal rights at every stage, ensure all recoverable damages are pursued, and manage interactions with public agencies to preserve remedies under Tennessee statutes.
Key Benefits of a Comprehensive Legal Strategy in Condemnation Cases
A comprehensive strategy focuses on capturing the full measure of compensation by assembling valuation professionals, documenting nonmarket losses, and preparing a coherent legal presentation. This approach helps identify damages beyond the acreage taken, such as loss of driveway access, business revenue decline, or decreased utility of the remaining property. By coordinating appraisal, title, and factual evidence, comprehensive representation increases the likelihood that a settlement or court award will reflect the true economic impact of the taking on the owner.
Beyond valuation, a comprehensive approach manages deadlines, negotiates with public agencies on procedural matters, and pursues appropriate remedies if offers fail to account for all damages. It also anticipates post acquisition issues, including distribution of proceeds and tax consequences. This methodical handling reduces the risk of accepting incomplete compensation and gives owners a clearer view of potential outcomes. For property owners with significant stakes in valuation or use, the benefits of full representation often justify the investment of time and resources.
Maximizing Financial Recovery for Owners
A comprehensive approach to condemnation looks beyond the headline offer to consider all compensable categories under the law, including severance damages and business interruption where applicable. By engaging valuation professionals and preparing supporting evidence, owners can present a credible case for increased payment. Careful documentation of improvements, leases, and market comparables can materially affect outcomes. In many cases, a well prepared claim or negotiated settlement results in higher net recovery than accepting the initial offer without a detailed valuation review.
Protecting Long Term Property Interests and Legal Rights
Comprehensive representation also preserves an owner’s legal options beyond immediate compensation, including the right to contest procedural defects or seek remedies for continued impacts on the remaining property. A structured approach protects against inadvertent waiver of claims and ensures proper handling of title and easement issues that can affect future use. Owners benefit from coordinated strategy that anticipates complications and addresses them proactively so that current decisions do not create unforeseen liabilities or lost value down the road.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Eminent domain lawyer Lakeland TN
- condemnation attorney Lakeland
- eminent domain compensation Tennessee
- condemnation claims Shelby County
- property acquisition law Lakeland
- inverse condemnation Tennessee
- just compensation appraisal Lakeland
- land takings lawyer Tennessee
- public use property law Lakeland
Practical Tips for Property Owners Facing Eminent Domain
Document Property Condition, Use, and Improvements
Start building a record of your property right away by photographing structures, improvements, and boundary markers, and collecting receipts, permits, and maintenance records. For business owners, track revenues, contracts, and customer impacts that relate to the property. Detailed documentation supports valuation claims and makes it easier to demonstrate nonmarket losses such as reduced access or diminished utility. Early organization of these materials also speeds appraisal preparation and helps counsel and valuation professionals present a clearer economic picture when negotiating with the condemning authority.
Obtain an Independent Valuation Early
Keep Detailed Records of All Communications
Preserve written correspondence, emails, and notes from phone calls with the condemning authority and any consultants they provide. Document meeting dates, attendees, and the substance of conversations. Clear records help demonstrate whether proper notice and procedures were followed and can be important if disputes arise about offers or timelines. Organized communication logs also assist counsel in assessing the strength of a claim, preparing counteroffers, and ensuring that procedural deadlines are met under Tennessee law.
Reasons Lakeland Property Owners Seek Condemnation Representation
Owners engage legal assistance for many reasons, including to ensure offers fully compensate for the property taken, to address impacts on remaining land, and to protect procedural rights in administrative or court proceedings. Representation helps gather supporting evidence, present valuation analyses, and negotiate settlements that account for both market and nonmarket losses. Many owners also seek guidance on tax, relocation, and distribution issues that arise after payment is made. Professional assistance helps owners make informed choices at each stage of the condemnation process.
Representation becomes particularly important when the taking involves partial acquisitions, commercial properties, or situations with unclear market comparables. Legal assistance can also be valuable when the condemning authority’s timeline pressures owners into quick decisions. Counsel can request additional time for review, coordinate appraisals, and negotiate interim arrangements. For owners uncertain about how an initial offer was calculated or about their rights under Tennessee statutes, early consultation helps preserve remedies and avoid inadvertent waivers that reduce compensation.
Common Situations That Trigger Eminent Domain or Condemnation Issues
Typical circumstances include public infrastructure projects such as road widening, utility expansions and easement needs, projects that require partial takings that affect access or use, and regulatory changes that effectively deprive owners of property use. Developers, municipalities, and utilities may seek rights that run through private land or require temporary construction easements. In some cases, damage caused by public works or utility operations leads owners to assert inverse condemnation claims. Each scenario requires a fact specific assessment to determine legal and valuation consequences.
Public Infrastructure and Transportation Projects
Road widening, bridge construction, and other transportation improvements often require acquisition of private right of way or easements. These projects may involve partial takings that change access patterns or reduce usable land, triggering claims for severance damages and other compensation. Owners affected by infrastructure projects should review proposed plans, timelines, and valuation reports carefully. Engaging counsel early helps ensure that technical impacts on property value are fully documented and that negotiations with the agency take into account both immediate and long term losses.
Utility Expansions and Easement Needs
Utilities and service providers may seek permanent easements or temporary construction rights to install lines, poles, or pipelines. Even when only an easement is taken, the impact on future use, landscaping, and development potential may be significant. Owners should evaluate the scope of rights being requested, potential restrictions, and whether compensation addresses the practical consequences of the easement. Accurate descriptions, surveys, and appraisals are key to ensuring that payments reflect both present and potential future losses to property value.
Partial Takings and Boundary Adjustments
When only a portion of a parcel is taken, the remaining property can suffer reduced utility, access changes, or aesthetic impacts that affect market value. These severance damages can be challenging to quantify and often require careful appraisal and factual explanation. Owners in partial takings scenarios should document how the loss changes use patterns, access to structures, and development potential. Addressing these issues proactively increases the chance that settlements or awards will compensate for the real economic effects of the partial acquisition.
Local Representation for Eminent Domain Matters in Lakeland
Jay Johnson Law Firm provides local representation to property owners in Lakeland, Tennessee, focusing on clear communication and practical results. We work to understand each client’s priorities, whether that is maximizing compensation, preserving use of remaining property, or resolving disputes efficiently. Our team coordinates valuation resources, reviews offers, and advocates for fair outcomes in negotiations or court proceedings. If you have received notice of a taking or suspect governmental action may affect your land, contact us to discuss the facts and possible next steps to protect your rights and interests.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Condemnation Matters in Lakeland
Clients choose our firm because we combine practical legal guidance with focused attention to valuation and evidentiary details that matter in condemnation cases. We help assemble documentation, coordinate independent appraisals, and prepare persuasive presentations for negotiation or court review. Our approach emphasizes explaining options and likely outcomes in plain language so owners can make informed decisions. We also work to minimize disruption by managing communications with public agencies and moving matters forward efficiently.
When a taking involves complex factual or legal issues, our firm assists clients by organizing title work, surveys, and other technical materials needed to support compensation claims. We seek to preserve all available damages and address post payment concerns such as relocation and proceeds distribution. By handling the details, we allow owners to focus on their lives and businesses while we pursue the best possible financial outcome within the constraints and timelines of the condemnation process.
We recognize that each property and owner has unique priorities, so we tailor our representation to those goals. Whether negotiating a fair settlement, preparing a case for hearing, or addressing complex valuation disputes, our process begins with a careful review and a clear explanation of options. For residents of Lakeland and the surrounding Shelby County area, our firm provides responsive representation and practical legal counsel to help preserve rights and pursue appropriate compensation.
Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Discuss Your Eminent Domain Matter
How Jay Johnson Law Firm Handles Eminent Domain Cases
Our process begins with an initial consultation to review notices, offers, and property documentation. We evaluate valuation materials, commission independent appraisals when needed, and identify potential claims for severance damages or other losses. We then present a strategy tailored to the client’s objectives, whether that involves focused negotiation or preparation for a hearing. Throughout the process we communicate developments, manage deadlines, and coordinate any outside professionals so clients understand the path forward and the potential financial outcomes.
Step 1: Initial Review and Case Assessment
The initial phase involves gathering all relevant documents, including deeds, surveys, tax records, and any correspondence from the condemning authority. We assess title issues, easement language, and the scope of the taking to identify legal and valuation implications. This review establishes the elements of loss that should be addressed, such as market value of property taken, severance damages, and relocation impacts. A timely and thorough initial assessment is essential to preserve rights and prepare a tailored strategy for negotiation or litigation.
Document Collection and Title Review
Accurate title information, surveys, and a history of property use form the foundation of a strong valuation and compensation claim. We help clients obtain and organize deeds, plats, permits, and prior appraisal reports that bear on value. Title review also reveals any easements, liens, or ownership complexities that may affect who is entitled to compensation. By identifying these matters early, we can address them in negotiations and ensure distribution of any proceeds aligns with legal entitlements and client goals.
Preliminary Valuation and Strategy Development
After assembling documentation, we work with valuation professionals to develop a preliminary estimate of compensation and identify evidence needed to support higher recovery. This stage includes determining whether a full appraisal, market study, or specialized valuation is necessary. Based on the valuation work, we propose a negotiation strategy and contingency plans for pursuing additional remedies. The goal is to present a coherent claim supported by data that the condemning authority or a court will find persuasive.
Step 2: Negotiation, Settlement Efforts, and Administrative Proceedings
Most condemnation matters are resolved through negotiation if the owner and condemning authority can agree on compensation. We prepare demand packages that document value and present reasoned counteroffers. When administrative procedures or mediation are available, we represent clients during those sessions to press for favorable settlements. If settlement is not achievable, we prepare the case for court, ensuring evidentiary materials, witness preparation, and legal pleadings are ready for hearing. Throughout, we balance settlement prospects against litigation risks and timing considerations.
Preparing Demand Packages and Counteroffers
Demand packages assemble appraisal reports, photographs, documentation of improvements, and any business or relocation loss evidence into a clear presentation that supports a higher compensation figure. We draft counteroffers that explain the valuation basis and propose settlement terms that reflect all recoverable losses. Well prepared submissions increase the likelihood of meaningful negotiations and can shorten the time to resolution. We also handle communications to ensure that offers are documented and that deadlines for responses are observed.
Mediation and Administrative Hearings
Where mediation or agency hearings are part of the process, we represent clients to advocate for fair settlements or rulings. These forums allow for structured negotiation and often achieve resolution without protracted litigation. During mediation, we present valuation evidence, cross examine opposing appraisals where permitted, and seek terms that account for long term impacts. In administrative hearings, we submit testimony and documentary evidence and argue legal issues that may affect both the right to take and the measure of compensation.
Step 3: Litigation, Trial Preparation, and Post Judgment Matters
If negotiation and administrative steps fail to produce fair compensation, the matter may proceed to court for a judicial determination of value or to challenge procedural defects. Litigation involves preparing pleadings, conducting discovery, and presenting evidence at trial. After judgment, additional matters such as distribution of proceeds, tax considerations, and potential appeals require attention. Our team organizes trial-ready evidence and coordinates with valuation professionals to present a coherent case that supports full recovery under governing statutes.
Preparing Professional Testimony and Appraisals
When a case goes to hearing, reliable valuation evidence and professional testimony are essential to establish fair market value and additional damages. We coordinate appraisers, land use professionals, and other qualified witnesses to prepare reports and testimony that address the court’s requirements. Preparation includes reviewing methodologies, refining comparables, and ensuring witnesses can clearly explain how they reached their conclusions. Careful preparation increases the persuasiveness of valuation evidence presented at trial or in administrative hearings.
Post Judgment Remedies and Appeals
After a judgment or settlement, there may be follow up steps such as distribution of proceeds, resolving liens, addressing tax implications, or pursuing appeals when appropriate. We assist clients in implementing the court’s decision, negotiating any outstanding issues, and advising on choices about appeals or compounding claims. Post judgment work ensures that compensation actually reaches entitled parties and addresses any lingering legal or practical matters related to the taking or the remaining property.
Frequently Asked Questions About Eminent Domain and Condemnation
What is eminent domain and how does it work in Tennessee?
Eminent domain is the authority that allows governmental entities and certain agencies to acquire private land for public use subject to payment. The process may begin with an approach to purchase and escalate to a condemnation action when voluntary agreement cannot be reached. Tennessee law requires notice and procedures that give owners opportunities to respond and to seek a fair determination of compensation. Owners should review any notices or offers carefully and document property characteristics that may affect valuation. Consulting counsel early helps preserve rights and deadlines that matter in the process.
How is just compensation determined in a condemnation case?
Just compensation is generally measured by the fair market value of the property interest taken, which can include permanent easements or full ownership transfers. Appraisals, comparable sales, and expert valuation methodologies contribute to the determination. Additional damages such as severance damages to remaining property, temporary construction impacts, and relocation expenses may also be recoverable. Accurate evidence and well documented valuation support a credible claim for higher compensation. Engaging valuation professionals early ensures the methods used reflect the true economic impact of the taking.
Can I challenge a government taking or the amount offered?
Yes, owners can challenge both the necessity of the taking in limited circumstances and the amount offered as compensation. Challenges typically focus on valuation or procedural compliance rather than the abstract power to take property for public use. Owners may negotiate, participate in administrative hearings, or pursue court proceedings to contest compensation levels. Timely actions such as preserving evidence, requesting additional time to review offers, and filing proper responses are important to keep these options available. Legal guidance helps identify the most effective route for contesting an offer.
What steps should I take after receiving a condemnation notice or offer?
After receiving a notice or offer, assemble your deeds, surveys, tax records, photographs, and any leases or income statements that relate to the property. Avoid signing away rights without a full understanding of what is being released. Request time to review appraisal reports and seek an independent valuation if the stakes are significant. Document communications and preserve all written materials. Consulting with counsel early helps you understand whether the offer reflects all compensable elements and whether negotiation or further action is advisable under Tennessee law.
How long does the condemnation process typically take?
The timeline for condemnation varies based on complexity, negotiation progress, and whether the matter proceeds to hearing or trial. Some matters resolve in a matter of months through negotiation, while others involving contested valuation and litigation can take a year or more. Factors that affect timing include the need for appraisals, scheduling of hearings, discovery, and potential appeals. Owners should plan for a process that can extend beyond initial offers and consult with counsel about realistic timelines for resolution in their specific case.
Will I be required to relocate, and who covers relocation costs?
Relocation is sometimes required when the taking involves the owner’s residence or business, and statutes or programs may provide relocation assistance for eligible occupants. Who pays relocation costs depends on the circumstances and applicable relocation statutes, which can include federal or state programs for certain projects. Document moving costs, lost business revenue, and other quantifiable relocation impacts. Counsel can advise whether relocation benefits apply and how to claim those costs as part of the compensation package when applicable to your situation.
What types of evidence help support a higher valuation claim?
Valuation evidence that supports a higher claim includes recent comparable sales, well documented appraisals addressing the property’s highest and best use, income and expense records for income producing properties, photographs of improvements, and expert reports that explain severance impacts. Surveys and evidence of access or utility changes also help quantify loss. Business owners should document contracts, customer patterns, and revenue trends to support claims for interruption or diminished income. A comprehensive evidentiary package improves the credibility of a valuation claim in negotiations or hearings.
How are legal fees and costs typically handled in condemnation matters?
Fee arrangements vary, and many firms handle condemnation matters on hourly or contingency bases depending on case specifics and client preferences. Some matters use contingency arrangements where fees are a percentage of the recovery, while other cases involve hourly billing with clear cost estimates. Discussing fee structures and anticipated costs early helps clients choose an arrangement that aligns with their goals. We provide clear explanations of anticipated expenses such as appraisal fees and filing costs so clients understand the financial aspects of pursuing compensation.
Can a municipality take only part of my property for a public project?
Yes, a municipality or agency can acquire only part of a property for public use, often leaving the remainder in private hands. Partial takings can produce severance damages when the remaining parcel suffers reduced utility, access, or value. Owners in partial taking situations should focus on documenting how the change affects use and value so those impacts are included in compensation claims. Negotiating or litigating for full recovery of severance damages often requires solid appraisal evidence and a clear presentation of factual impacts on the remaining property.
What is inverse condemnation and when might I have that claim?
Inverse condemnation arises when a governmental action effectively takes or damages property without a formal taking procedure, and the owner seeks compensation through a claim or lawsuit. Examples include damage caused by public works or regulations that deprive an owner of reasonable use. Inverse condemnation claims require proof that the governmental action caused the loss and that just compensation is owed. Pursuing such claims involves factual investigation into causation and losses, and legal analysis of the agency’s actions and related statutes to determine available remedies.