Title Review and Curative Work Attorney in Arlington, Tennessee

Complete Guide to Title Review and Curative Work for Arlington Real Estate

Title review and curative work help homebuyers and property owners resolve defects that can block transfers, financing, or clear ownership. At Jay Johnson Law Firm serving Arlington and Shelby County, we focus on identifying title issues early and recommending practical steps to remove defects. This includes examining public records, past deeds, liens, easements, and probate matters to determine whether an issue can be resolved through documentation, quiet title actions, affidavits, or negotiated releases. Clear title is necessary for a smooth sale, refinancing, or transfer, and a careful review prevents delays and unexpected costs later in the transaction process.

Many title problems are subtle until a lender, buyer, or insurance company raises a concern during closing. Common concerns include outstanding liens, missing heir signatures, incorrect legal descriptions, and unsigned conveyances. Our approach in Arlington begins with a thorough review of the title report and related documents, then we outline the curative options that match your timeline and goals. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or refinancing, early attention to title issues reduces stress, streamlines closing, and protects your ownership rights with documented solutions that meet local legal and recording requirements.

Why Title Review and Curative Work Matter for Your Property

Addressing title defects before closing safeguards your investment and avoids post-closing disputes. A comprehensive title review uncovers matters that could impair transfer or mortgageability, such as undisclosed liens, boundary discrepancies, or missing signatures from prior owners. Curative work provides remedies to clear or mitigate those defects through record corrections, releases, affidavits, quiet title actions, or settlement negotiations. Taking these steps protects marketable title, supports clean closings, and prevents future challenges to ownership that could be costly and time-consuming to correct after possession or refinancing has occurred.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Real Estate Practice

Jay Johnson Law Firm serves clients across Tennessee, including Arlington and Shelby County, with focused real estate representation. Our team assists buyers, sellers, lenders, and title companies with title review and curative strategies designed to resolve recorded issues and facilitate closing. We combine practical knowledge of local recording practices with disciplined document drafting and negotiation to clear matters that could impede transactions. Clients benefit from clear communication, timely updates, and pragmatic recommendations that align with their transaction timelines and budget considerations throughout the curative process.

Understanding Title Review and Curative Work in Residential and Commercial Transactions

Title review begins with a careful reading of the title insurance commitment, chain of title, public records, and any recorded documents that affect ownership. This service identifies discrepancies such as gaps in the chain of title, conveyances that lack proper signatures, unreleased liens, or recorded easements that conflict with intended property use. Curative work follows when a defect is found: the attorney evaluates whether documentation can be corrected, whether a release or satisfaction can be obtained, or whether a court action is the most effective remedy. Understanding these steps helps clients choose a responsive strategy appropriate for their closing timetable.

Different title issues call for different curative approaches. Some problems are resolved by obtaining recorded releases, corrected deeds, or sworn affidavits from parties with knowledge. Other issues may require negotiation with lienholders, obtaining missing consents from heirs, or filing a quiet title action to establish clear ownership. The chosen path depends on the defect’s nature, the parties involved, and the urgency of the transaction. We work with lenders and title companies in Arlington to ensure curative steps meet underwriting standards and local recording office requirements, so closings proceed with minimal delay.

What Title Review and Curative Work Entail

Title review is the process of inspecting recorded instruments and title insurance commitments to detect matters that affect marketable title. Curative work refers to the legal and administrative actions taken to remove or neutralize those matters so the property can be transferred or financed. This can include drafting corrective deeds, obtaining lien releases, preparing affidavits from parties with knowledge, arranging probate filings when ownership is unclear, or pursuing quiet title cases. The goal is to provide clear, recorded documentation that lenders, buyers, and insurers will accept for a clean transfer of ownership.

Key Steps in Title Curative Processes

A practical curative process includes document review, chain of title analysis, outreach to affected parties, preparation of corrective paperwork, and recording the resolution with the county clerk. Early coordination with escrow, lenders, and title insurance companies ensures the chosen remedies satisfy all stakeholders. Communication with heirs, lienholders, and prior owners may produce voluntary releases or signatures that save time and avoid litigation. When informal resolution is not possible, filing a quiet title action or other court remedy can provide an authoritative resolution recorded with the land records to establish clear ownership.

Key Terms You Should Know About Title Review and Curative Work

Understanding common title and curative terms helps property owners navigate transactions. Items such as liens, easements, restrictive covenants, chain of title, curative affidavits, and quiet title actions recur in these matters. Recognizing what each term means clarifies the issues found during review and the steps needed to resolve them. We explain these terms in plain language and relate them to your specific property so you can make informed decisions about curative options and timelines when preparing for closing in Arlington or handling post-closing title questions.

Chain of Title

Chain of title is the recorded sequence of conveyances, liens, and other instruments that show how ownership of a property has changed over time. A complete and continuous chain demonstrates clear transfer from prior owners to the current owner, while gaps or breaks can indicate missing signatures, unidentified heirs, or unrecorded transactions. Identifying breaks in the chain is a primary reason for title review, and resolving those breaks through corrective deeds, affidavits, or court actions is a key part of curative work to ensure marketable title.

Quiet Title Action

A quiet title action is a court proceeding used to settle disputes over property ownership or to remove adverse claims from the record. When other attempts to obtain releases or corrections fail, a quiet title lawsuit requests a judicial determination that the plaintiff holds clear title and that competing claims are invalid. The court’s judgment is recorded and provides conclusive public documentation that clarifies ownership for lenders, buyers, and future owners. Quiet title actions are often a final recourse when parties cannot otherwise agree on curative measures.

Lien and Lien Release

A lien is a legal claim against property to secure payment of a debt or obligation, such as a mortgage, tax lien, or judgment. Outstanding liens can prevent sale or financing until they are satisfied. A lien release is a recorded document from the lienholder stating the debt has been paid or otherwise resolved, and it removes the lien from the property’s public record. Obtaining lien releases is a common and often straightforward element of curative work, though it sometimes requires negotiation or payment to clear the title.

Corrective Deed and Affidavit

A corrective deed or affidavit is a recorded document used to fix errors in previously recorded instruments, such as an incorrect legal description, a misspelled name, or a mistaken date. These documents clarify the original intent and correct the public record so the chain of title accurately reflects ownership. Preparing and recording corrective documents is a common curative step that often prevents more extensive litigation when mistakes are clerical or technical rather than reflective of competing ownership claims.

Comparing Limited Versus Comprehensive Title Curative Approaches

When a title issue arises, practical options range from limited document fixes to comprehensive court actions. A limited approach seeks to resolve specific recorded defects quickly through corrective deeds, releases, or affidavits and is often suitable when parties are cooperative and the defect is narrow. A comprehensive approach may include a full review of the chain of title, negotiations with multiple claimants, and filing a quiet title action to obtain a judicial resolution that clears broader or contested issues. The right approach balances urgency, cost, and the likelihood of voluntary cooperation from other parties.

When a Targeted Curative Approach Works Best:

Minor Clerical or Recording Errors

A targeted approach is often sufficient for clerical or recording errors that do not involve conflicting ownership claims. Fixing misspellings, incorrect legal descriptions, or omitted signatures when the responsible parties are reachable and willing to sign corrective documents can be completed promptly. Recording a corrective deed or affidavit can clear the defect and satisfy a title insurer or lender without resorting to litigation. This saves time and expense when the facts are straightforward and cooperation is available from those whose actions created the problem.

When All Claimants Are Cooperative

If lienholders, heirs, or prior owners are available and willing to provide recorded releases or affidavits, a limited curative plan can resolve the matter efficiently. Obtaining voluntary signatures or releases removes the need for court intervention and allows closings to proceed on schedule. In these situations, a lawyer’s role often focuses on preparing clear, legally sufficient documents, coordinating recordation, and ensuring the solutions meet lender and title insurance requirements so the transaction can conclude without protracted legal action.

When Broader Curative Measures Are Required:

Disputed Ownership or Unknown Heirs

Comprehensive measures are appropriate when ownership is contested or heirs cannot be located. Such cases often demand in-depth title research, genealogical inquiries, service on interested parties, and potentially a quiet title action to obtain legal clarity. These steps create a formal, recorded resolution that removes uncertainty for lenders and future buyers. While more time-consuming, a comprehensive path provides the strongest long-term protection by securing a judicial determination of ownership when informal remedies are unavailable.

Multiple Liens or Complex Recorded Encumbrances

When a property has several competing liens, judgments, or complicated encumbrances, comprehensive curative work coordinates resolution among multiple parties and may include negotiation, payoff arrangements, or court proceedings. Clearing multiple encumbrances often requires sequencing and verification to ensure each release is recorded properly. Resolving these issues comprehensively helps prevent remaining encumbrances from jeopardizing the property’s marketability and reduces the risk of future claims arising from unresolved interests.

Advantages of a Thorough Curative Strategy

A comprehensive curative strategy delivers durable resolution and minimizes the likelihood of future disputes about ownership. By addressing every identified defect and ensuring each corrective step is recorded properly, clients receive a level of certainty that supports resale, refinancing, or estate planning. Thoroughness often reduces the chance of surprise issues cropping up later, because research and legal action are used to eliminate or neutralize potential claims prior to transfer. This approach often aligns with lender and title insurer expectations for clean marketable title.

Comprehensive curative work also preserves the value of the property by removing clouds on title that could depress sale prices or cause lenders to impose additional conditions. A full remedy program, from negotiating releases to recording court judgments, clarifies the public record so future buyers and lenders can rely on the recorded chain of title. While it may require more time and resources up front, the long-term benefit is a more marketable property and reduced legal exposure for current and future owners.

Long-Term Marketability and Peace of Mind

Clearing defects comprehensively increases the property’s long-term marketability and reduces risk for owners and lenders. A recorded resolution, whether through releases, corrected documents, or court judgment, removes doubts that could delay future sales or refinancing. That clarity gives sellers and buyers confidence that recorded ownership reflects reality, and it saves time and expense by preventing disputes later. For owners who intend to hold or pass on property, comprehensive curative work preserves value and reduces future administrative burdens for heirs or successors.

Faster Future Transactions and Fewer Surprises

Resolving title defects on a comprehensive basis prevents repetitive fixes and reduces the likelihood of last-minute issues in subsequent transactions. When the public record is accurate and all necessary releases and corrections are recorded, future buyers and lenders face fewer hurdles. This streamlines later sales and refinance efforts, as fewer exceptions remain on title reports and fewer additional curative steps are needed. The resulting predictability benefits owners who value smoothness and continuity for property-related decisions over time.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Practical Tips for Handling Title Issues

Obtain the Title Commitment Early

Request the title commitment as soon as a purchase agreement is signed so any defects are identified early. Early review provides time to address items that could delay closing, such as outstanding liens or missing signatures, and gives you options for resolving issues before funds are committed. Early identification also allows for negotiation of responsibilities between buyer and seller and coordination with lenders and title insurance underwriters. Addressing title concerns early minimizes costly delays and increases your chances of a smooth, timely closing.

Communicate with All Parties Promptly

When a defect is discovered, prompt outreach to lenders, sellers, title companies, and other interested parties helps develop a coordinated resolution. Timely communication often reveals straightforward fixes such as recorded releases or corrective deeds. If parties are cooperative, curative steps can be completed quickly without court involvement. Clear communication also ensures all stakeholders understand the plan and timing, reducing the risk of missteps during recordation and preventing misunderstandings that could extend the curative timeline.

Keep Accurate Records of Every Step

Maintain a file with copies of the title commitment, all correspondence, recorded releases, corrective documents, and any court filings. Accurate records establish a clear trail of curative actions and can be invaluable if questions arise later. Recording all corrective documents promptly with the county clerk ensures future title searches reflect the resolution. Organized documentation also streamlines coordination with title insurers and lenders, who may request proof that issues were properly addressed before closing or when issuing insurance commitments.

Why You Should Consider Professional Title Review and Curative Work

Purchasing, selling, or refinancing real property involves scrutiny of recorded documents that determine who has rights to the land. When title issues are identified, professional review and curative work reduce the risk of post-closing disputes and unexpected financial obligations. Addressing problems ahead of closing protects your transaction timeline and can prevent lenders from delaying or denying financing. Engaging legal assistance early provides clarity about responsibilities and realistic options tailored to the complexity of the defect and your transaction goals in Arlington and Shelby County.

Estate-related transfers, boundary disputes, and old liens are frequent causes of title defects that can expose owners to liability or complicate sales. Curative services can resolve these matters and produce recorded documentation that future buyers and lenders will accept. Considering this service protects your investment and ensures you are not left to handle lingering obligations later. Thoughtful curative planning also supports estate and succession planning by ensuring the title record accurately reflects intended transfers and beneficiaries.

Common Situations That Trigger Title Review and Curative Work

Title reviews frequently arise in transactions involving older properties, inherited real estate, properties with multiple owners, or when unconsolidated liens appear in public records. Other triggers include boundary disputes, prior unrecorded conveyances discovered during underwriting, or mismatches in legal descriptions. Lenders and title insurers often require curative steps before issuing policies or advancing funds. Recognizing these scenarios early allows a methodical plan to remove or neutralize records problems, protecting the closing schedule and future transferability of the property.

Inherited Property with Unclear Probate Records

When a property is transferred through inheritance, gaps in probate records or missing heir consents can cloud the title. Curative work in these cases may involve probate filings, heirship affidavits, or quiet title actions to document rightful ownership. Ensuring probate matters are properly concluded and recorded prevents challenges from unexpected claimants and provides lenders and buyers with confidence in the property’s legal status. Thorough documentation is essential to finalize the transfer and support future transactions without lingering disputes.

Outstanding or Forgotten Liens

Old mortgages, tax liens, mechanic’s liens, or unpaid judgments sometimes remain on the public record and block a clean transfer. Curative work addresses these by obtaining recorded releases or negotiating payoffs and documenting satisfactions. In some cases, additional investigation may reveal the lien was erroneously recorded or already satisfied but not released, requiring a corrective recording to clear the record. Resolving these liens is vital for satisfying lender requirements and ensuring buyers receive marketable title.

Defective or Incomplete Conveyances

A deed with missing or incorrect signatures, a flawed legal description, or failing to identify all transferring parties creates a defect that prevents a straightforward closing. Curative measures include preparing corrective deeds, obtaining missing acknowledgments or affidavits, and recording corrections. These steps confirm that the intended transfer properly appears in the public record and support issuance of title insurance. Correcting conveyance defects restores continuity in the chain of title and reduces the risk of future disputes over ownership.

Jay Johnson

Arlington Real Estate Title and Curative Services

Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to assist Arlington property owners, buyers, sellers, and lenders with title review and curative matters. We evaluate title commitments, outline curative pathways, prepare necessary recordings, and coordinate with title companies and lenders to resolve issues promptly. Our work is practical and focused on actionable steps that allow closings to proceed or future transfers to be secure. Clients in Shelby County can rely on clear communication about timelines, costs, and realistic outcomes for each title defect we encounter.

Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Title Review and Curative Work

Our firm offers local knowledge of Tennessee recording practices and a practical approach to clearing title issues that arise in real estate transactions. We focus on timely resolution tailored to the transaction’s needs, coordinating with lenders and title insurers to meet underwriting requirements. Clients receive clear explanations of options and a recommended plan to resolve defects efficiently, whether that requires document preparation, negotiation, or litigation in a limited set of cases.

We prioritize communication and responsiveness throughout the curative process, keeping clients informed about required documentation, anticipated timing, and any potential costs. For matters that can be resolved without court proceedings, we seek voluntary releases and corrective recordings to minimize delay. When litigation becomes necessary, we pursue remedies that aim to secure recorded resolution while considering the transaction timeline and client objectives in Arlington and Shelby County.

Clients working with Jay Johnson Law Firm benefit from a methodical, documentation-focused approach that emphasizes accurate recordation and alignment with lender and title insurer expectations. We assist with probate coordination, lien negotiations, and preparation of corrective instruments so that property transfers proceed with confidence. Our practice in Tennessee centers on clear legal steps to protect property interests and reduce the risk of future disputes over ownership or encumbrances.

Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm for Title Review and Curative Assistance

How the Title Curative Process Typically Works at Our Firm

Our curative process begins with a detailed review of the title commitment and public records to identify recorded issues. We then discuss findings with the client and propose a plan that balances speed, cost, and likelihood of success. Next we reach out to affected parties to obtain releases or signatures when possible and prepare corrective documents for recordation. If necessary, we file litigation such as a quiet title action. Throughout, we coordinate with title companies and lenders to ensure the remedies satisfy underwriting conditions for closing.

Step One: Initial Title Review and Assessment

The first step is a comprehensive review of the title commitment, recorded deeds, liens, easements, and other public records related to the property. This assessment identifies defects, missing documents, and potential hurdles to closing. We catalog each matter, determine which can be addressed by administrative corrections or releases, and which may require more intensive negotiation or court action. The assessment informs a recommended curative plan and estimated timelines so clients understand the path forward and associated costs.

Document Analysis and Chain of Title Review

This phase focuses on reconstructing the chain of title and verifying every recorded instrument affecting the property. We identify gaps, inconsistencies in legal descriptions, prior conveyance defects, and recorded encumbrances. The goal is to determine the root cause of any exception in the title commitment and to identify the minimal legal steps that will resolve each issue. This thorough document analysis reduces the risk of unforeseen claims and creates a clear roadmap for corrections or legal action.

Initial Client Consultation and Strategy Planning

Following the document review, we meet with the client to explain findings and recommend a strategy tailored to the transaction timeline and budget. We prioritize issues that must be resolved before closing and outline options for resolution, from obtaining releases to filing corrective instruments. This stage ensures the client understands tradeoffs and approves the plan before we contact other parties or incur further costs. Clear expectations from the start streamline subsequent curative steps.

Step Two: Outreach, Negotiation, and Document Preparation

In the second step, we contact lienholders, prior owners, heirs, and other interested parties to request releases, signatures, or clarifying affidavits. When voluntary cooperation is possible, we prepare release forms, corrective deeds, and affidavits for execution and recording. Negotiation may be necessary to resolve payoffs or disputes. We work to secure clean recorded documents that satisfy lenders and title underwriters, coordinating the timing of recordings to preserve priorities and support a timely closing.

Negotiation with Lienholders and Interested Parties

Negotiations may involve settling lien amounts, arranging payoffs, or obtaining written releases in exchange for payment or other arrangements. Clear documentation of the agreed resolution is prepared for recording so the public record reflects the outcome. Timely negotiation reduces the need for court involvement and often preserves the closing timeline. We prioritize practical resolutions that align with the client’s objectives and the expectations of lenders and title insurers.

Drafting and Recording Corrective Instruments

Once parties agree to corrective language or releases, we prepare the necessary instruments, obtain signatures, and oversee recording with the county clerk. Recording must be precise to link the corrective document to the original matter and eliminate the exception. Properly executed and recorded documents help ensure lenders and title companies will accept the correction and move forward with closing or issuing an insurance policy. Accurate recordation protects the chain of title for future transactions.

Step Three: Litigation and Final Resolution When Needed

If voluntary resolutions are not possible, we pursue court remedies such as a quiet title action, partition, or other declaratory relief necessary to resolve competing claims. Litigation can provide definitive judicial determinations regarding ownership or liens, and the resulting judgment is recorded to clear the public record. While more time-consuming, court action produces an authoritative resolution that allows title insurers and lenders to proceed with confidence. Our priority is to obtain the recorded outcomes required for marketable title.

Filing a Quiet Title Action

A quiet title action involves filing suit, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence establishing the rightful owner. The court issues a judgment resolving ownership disputes and ordering the record corrected. The judgment is then recorded with the county clerk to give public notice. Quiet title actions are used when other remedies fail or when multiple potential claimants must be formally resolved. This process provides long-term clarity for owners, lenders, and buyers.

Recording Court Orders and Finalizing Title

After obtaining a favorable court judgment or other legal order, we arrange for proper recording of the judgment and any implementing documents. Recording the court’s decision finalizes the curative process and creates documentary evidence that clears the title for future transactions. This step completes the chain of title correction, allowing title insurers to remove exceptions and lenders to proceed. Final recorded resolutions reduce the risk of later claims and support stable ownership moving forward.

Frequently Asked Questions About Title Review and Curative Work

What is a title commitment and why is it important?

A title commitment is a report from a title insurance company that outlines the conditions, exceptions, and requirements for issuing title insurance. It summarizes recorded matters that affect ownership, such as mortgages, liens, easements, and restrictions. The commitment identifies issues that must be addressed before a final policy can be issued and provides a roadmap for curative steps needed to secure clean title for a transaction. Reviewing the title commitment early allows buyers, sellers, and lenders to identify and resolve defects before closing. Addressing the title insurer’s listed requirements reduces the risk of last-minute delays, as the commitment clarifies the exceptions that must be cleared or insured over to complete the transaction.

The timeline for curative work varies with the nature of the defect and the willingness of other parties to cooperate. Simple fixes like obtaining a lien release or a corrective deed can be completed in a matter of days to a few weeks once signatures are obtained and documents are recorded. These administrative matters are often resolved quickly when the involved parties are reachable and agreeable. More complex matters, such as locating missing heirs, negotiating with multiple lienholders, or pursuing a quiet title action, can take several months or longer. Litigation pauses and service timelines add time, and coordinating recordings or payoffs may extend the overall schedule. Early review helps set realistic expectations for timing.

Not all curative work requires court action. Many title defects are addressed through corrective documents, lien releases, or affidavits signed by parties with knowledge of the matter. When parties cooperate, administrative remedies can clear the record without the expense and time of litigation. These nonlitigation paths are often the most efficient way to resolve straightforward issues. Court action becomes necessary when voluntary resolution is not possible or when ownership is disputed and multiple claimants must be resolved formally. A quiet title action or other judicial remedy provides a final determination that is recorded, offering durable resolution when informal measures fail.

Costs for curative work depend on the complexity of the defects and whether litigation is required. Administrative measures such as drafting corrective deeds, obtaining releases, and recordation typically involve modest attorney fees and recording costs. Negotiated payoffs for liens will vary based on the debt amounts involved but are separate from legal fees. If court proceedings are necessary, costs are higher due to filing fees, service costs, potential discovery, and attorney time for litigation. We provide estimates and discuss likely paths and associated costs after the initial title assessment so clients can weigh options relative to their transaction timeline and budget.

A minor title issue may sometimes be resolved at or after closing if the parties agree and the title insurer is willing to issue a policy with an exception or indemnity. Lenders typically require removal of certain types of defects before funding, so whether a closing can proceed depends on the defect’s nature and lender requirements. In some cases, the parties agree to a short holdback or escrow arrangement to address the issue post-closing. It is generally safer to resolve known defects before closing to avoid future disputes. Discussing the issue with your attorney and the title company will clarify whether a conditional closing is permissible or if resolving the defect prior to transfer is necessary to protect all parties.

If a lien is discovered during closing, the usual path is to confirm whether it has been satisfied and obtain a recorded release if so. If the lienholder is still owed, the parties may negotiate a payoff or escrow arrangement to satisfy the debt at closing. Title insurers and lenders often require liens to be paid or released before funds are disbursed to ensure the property transfers free of encumbrances. When a lien cannot be resolved immediately, the closing may be delayed until the issue is cleared or until an agreed escrow or indemnity arrangement is in place. Prompt communication and negotiation with the lienholder help determine the best path to move the transaction forward.

Consider a quiet title action when ownership claims are disputed or when heirs, unknown parties, or adverse claimants prevent a clean recorded chain of title. If other parties refuse to sign releases or the claims are contested, a judicial determination may be necessary to establish clear ownership. Quiet title actions are particularly useful when documentation alone cannot resolve competing interests and recorded certainty is required for sale or financing. Before filing suit, we evaluate alternative curative steps to avoid litigation if possible. If those options are exhausted, filing the quiet title action creates a final, recorded judgment that clears the public record and allows the transaction to proceed with greater certainty.

Responsibility for curative costs is often negotiated between buyer and seller in the purchase agreement. In many transactions, the seller is expected to deliver marketable title and may be responsible for clearing defects discovered through title review. However, agreements can allocate responsibility differently, and lenders may impose specific curative requirements as a condition of financing. When curative work involves third-party payoffs or litigation, the parties typically negotiate allocation of those costs. We assist clients in understanding their obligations under the contract and in negotiating fair resolutions that support closing and protect client interests.

Title insurance protects against certain covered defects that were unknown at the time of issuing the policy, subject to exclusions and policy terms. A title insurance policy can provide financial protection against covered defects that arise after issuance, depending on the type of policy and the specifics of the claim. It is important to review the policy and commitment to understand what is covered and what exceptions remain. Policy coverage does not replace the need for curative work to remove exceptions that would prevent closing. Title insurance often requires specific recorded remedies or exceptions be addressed before issuing a lender’s policy. Understanding the scope of coverage helps clients weigh curative options and potential claims resolution under the policy.

You can minimize title problems by keeping clear records of prior transactions, ensuring deeds are correctly executed and recorded, and promptly satisfying and recording releases for liens or mortgages when paid. Disclosing known issues early to buyers and title companies and obtaining recorded corrective documents if errors are discovered prevents surprises during underwriting. Regularly monitoring recorded documents during property transfers and coordinating with a title company reduces potential defects. When inheriting or transferring property, complete probate and transfer filings correctly and record them promptly. Consulting with legal counsel early in complex situations, such as multiple heirs or boundary uncertainties, helps identify and address potential title issues before they complicate sales or refinancing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call