Comprehensive Guide to Title Review and Curative Work in Murfreesboro
Title review and curative work protect property transactions by identifying and resolving defects that might affect ownership or transfer. In Murfreesboro, buyers, sellers, lenders, and owners benefit from careful review of deeds, liens, easements, and recorded encumbrances to prevent future disputes. This service evaluates public records, surveys, and historical documents to uncover clouds on title and determine whether additional action is needed to make the title marketable. A thorough initial review reduces the risk of delays at closing and can prevent costly litigation or title insurance claims after a sale completes.
Curative work involves steps taken to correct problems found during a title review, such as drafting corrective deeds, obtaining releases, or preparing affidavits to clear irregularities. These actions restore confidence in a property’s chain of title and help secure a clean transfer at closing. In many transactions, prompt curative measures preserve financing options and prevent disputes among heirs or prior owners. Working locally in Rutherford County means familiarity with county recording practices and regional title issues that commonly arise with older properties or properties that have had frequent ownership transfers.
Why Title Review and Curative Work Matters for Murfreesboro Property Transactions
A complete title review followed by any necessary curative work safeguards property values and keeps closings on schedule. Identifying liens, judgment records, or conflicting claims prevents unwelcome surprises for buyers and lenders. When a defect is found, curative work clarifies ownership and removes impediments to transfer, protecting both parties from future disputes. This proactive approach reduces the likelihood of mortgage issues or title insurance exceptions, and it helps trustees, personal representatives, and owners make informed decisions about sales, refinancing, or estate transfers.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Title Matters
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves Murfreesboro and the broader Rutherford County community with practical legal support in real estate matters. The firm focuses on careful document review, clear communication, and timely action to resolve title issues. Clients receive personalized attention tailored to local recording norms and common regional title questions. The team collaborates with title companies, surveyors, and lenders to secure the necessary releases or corrective documents needed to complete transactions efficiently while preserving clients’ interests throughout the process.
Understanding Title Review and Curative Work in Real Estate Transactions
Title review is a structured examination of public records and related documents to establish the status of a property’s ownership and to detect any encumbrances that could affect transferability. Reviewers look at deeds, liens, mortgages, tax records, easements, and probate filings among other instruments. The goal is to produce a clear report of title issues and recommendations for resolving each item. For buyers and lenders, this step is essential to determine whether title insurance can be issued without significant exceptions or whether curative steps must be taken to proceed with confidence.
Curative work consists of legal actions designed to remove title defects identified during review. This can include preparing corrective deeds, obtaining lien releases, negotiating payoffs, filing quiet title actions when necessary, or drafting affidavits to clarify past transfers. The specific route depends on the nature of the defect and the parties involved. Timely curative work helps avoid delays at closing and decreases the potential for future ownership disputes. The process requires coordination with county offices, title insurers, and other stakeholders to ensure documents are properly recorded and accepted.
What Title Review and Curative Work Entail
Title review is the systematic assessment of recorded instruments that govern a property’s rights and obligations, and curative work is the set of actions taken to rectify any defects that compromise transfer. Reviews are documented in a title report or memo that lists outstanding items such as liens, judgments, unpaid taxes, or ambiguous conveyances. Curative measures may be administrative, such as requesting releases, or legal, such as filing motions or agreements to settle competing claims. The combined process aims to produce a clear chain of title acceptable to buyers, sellers, lenders, and insurers.
Key Elements and Steps in Title Review and Curative Work
Effective title review follows a consistent sequence: gathering property identifiers, searching public records, identifying defects, and preparing a report that outlines potential issues and recommended remedies. Curative work proceeds by prioritizing items that prevent closing and pursuing targeted actions to resolve them, such as securing satisfactions of mortgage, obtaining corrective conveyances, or preparing deeds clarifying boundaries or ownership. Communication with all parties and recording corrected instruments are important final steps to ensure the title is marketable and that appropriate documentation is available for future reference.
Key Terms and Glossary for Title Review and Curative Work
Understanding the common terms used in title review helps clients make informed decisions during a transaction. The glossary below explains typical words and phrases encountered when reviewing title or performing curative work. Knowing what each term means clarifies why certain actions are recommended and how those actions affect closing timelines, costs, and the final status of ownership. Clear definitions also assist in communicating with title companies, county clerks, and other parties involved in the resolution process.
Lien
A lien is a legal claim against property used to secure payment of a debt or obligation. Liens can arise from mortgages, unpaid taxes, contractor claims, or court judgments. When present, a lien typically must be resolved before a lender will finance a purchase or a title insurance company will issue a policy without exception. Resolving a lien may involve obtaining a release, arranging a payoff, or negotiating a settlement. The presence of a lien affects transferability and may require documentation showing the lien has been satisfied and properly recorded as released.
Easement
An easement is a right held by one party to use a portion of another party’s land for a specific purpose, such as access, utilities, or drainage. Easements are typically recorded and can limit how the property owner uses the land. Understanding existing easements is essential during title review because they can reduce a property’s developable area or impact value. Curative work rarely removes an easement but may clarify its terms, verify its scope, or confirm its release if evidence shows it was extinguished but not properly recorded.
Quiet Title
A quiet title action is a legal proceeding filed to resolve competing claims and establish a clear chain of ownership for property. When records show conflicting conveyances or unresolved claims, a quiet title lawsuit asks a court to determine who holds valid title and to remove improper claims against the property. This remedy is more intensive than administrative curative steps and is used when other attempts to reconcile records or obtain releases fail. Successful court resolution results in a judicial order clarifying ownership and removing clouded interests from the record.
Affidavit of Heirship
An affidavit of heirship is a sworn statement used in some jurisdictions to document the heirs of a deceased owner when a formal probate is not completed. It is often used to transfer property that passed informally at death, especially in older or rural conveyances. Properly prepared affidavits can help clear title by providing a record of succession when no recorded will or probate exists. However, county recording offices and title insurers may require additional supporting documents or legal filings to accept such instruments in resolving title issues.
Comparing Limited Versus Comprehensive Approaches to Title Matters
When addressing title issues, parties may choose a limited approach that targets only defects blocking a specific transaction, or a comprehensive approach that resolves all known clouds and strengthens title for future transfers. A limited approach focuses on immediate needs, often achieving faster closings and lower upfront cost. Comprehensive work addresses broader questions of marketability and long-term protection. The optimal choice depends on the client’s priorities, whether quick transfer is essential, and how likely the property is to be resold or refinanced in the near term.
When a Focused Title Solution Is Appropriate:
Resolving Transaction-Specific Holdups
A limited approach is often appropriate when the goal is to complete a single sale or refinance and the title issues identified are narrow, such as a single recorded lien or a missing release. In those circumstances, targeted curative actions like obtaining a payoff letter, requesting a lien release, or preparing a corrective deed can clear the items necessary to close that particular deal without addressing unrelated historical matters. This path may be more economical and faster when future transfers are not anticipated shortly.
Lower Immediate Costs for One-Time Transactions
A focused curative plan can reduce initial outlays by concentrating resources on defects that prevent closing, which benefits clients who do not need full title remediation. This approach limits legal and administrative fees to the issues that directly impact the current transaction, allowing buyers and sellers to move forward without the time or expense of resolving legacy matters that do not present immediate barriers. It is sensible for situations where the parties accept certain recorded exceptions that will not hinder the specific sale.
When Complete Title Remediation Is Advisable:
Clearing Longstanding Clouds on Title
Comprehensive curative work is appropriate when records show multiple or persistent defects, such as unclear heirship, recurring judgment liens, or ambiguous conveyances dating back many years. Addressing all known defects improves marketability and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Comprehensive remediation often includes coordinated actions like filing quiet title suits, preparing corrective deeds covering several incidents, and confirming releases in the chain of title. Clients who plan to hold or resell the property benefit from resolving legacy matters proactively.
Long-Term Protection for Owners and Lenders
A full curative strategy provides broader protection for owners and lenders by eliminating uncertain claims and making title defensible for future transactions. Lenders are more likely to support financing when title is thoroughly cleared, and buyers gain confidence in the stability of their acquisition. Although more time-consuming and potentially more costly up front, this route reduces the chances of additional legal matters later, helping to preserve property value and facilitate future refinances or sales without recurring title surprises.
Benefits of Taking a Full Curative Approach to Title Problems
A comprehensive approach to title curative work addresses immediate closing concerns and legacy defects that may cause disputes later. Clearing the entire chain of title can enhance marketability, reduce title insurance exceptions, and create a more straightforward path for future transfers. This process strengthens the record by ensuring corrective instruments are properly recorded, releases are obtained and noted, and any necessary court orders are secured. The result is greater certainty for owners, buyers, and lenders regarding the property’s legal status.
Comprehensive remediation also reduces the administrative burden on future transactions by resolving issues that would otherwise resurface when the property is sold or refinanced. Addressing boundary questions, ambiguous conveyances, or unrecorded interests now prevents repeated searches and curative steps later. While the upfront investment is higher than a narrowly focused fix, the long-term savings in time, legal cost, and risk can be substantial, particularly for properties with complicated ownership histories or multiple recorded encumbrances.
Increased Marketability and Lender Confidence
When title matters are fully resolved, the property becomes more attractive to a wider pool of buyers and to lenders who may require clear title as a condition for financing. Complete curative work minimizes unexpected exceptions in title policies and supports smoother closings. This can translate into shorter sale timelines, fewer renegotiations, and stronger sale prices. Lenders gain assurance that their security interest is enforceable without lingering claims, which can facilitate loan approvals and more favorable terms for buyers.
Fewer Future Legal Disputes and Administrative Delays
Resolving title problems thoroughly reduces the chance of future disputes among heirs, prior owners, or lienholders, and diminishes the need for repeated legal work when the property changes hands again. Proper recording of corrective documents and court orders creates a clear public record that county offices, title companies, and future buyers can rely upon. This decreases the administrative friction for subsequent transactions and helps property owners avoid repeated investigations or litigation over the same historical issues.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- title review Murfreesboro
- curative work Rutherford County
- clear title Tennessee
- quiet title action Murfreesboro
- title issues Rutherford County
- deed correction Murfreesboro
- easement review Tennessee
- lien release Murfreesboro
- property title review lawyer Tennessee
Practical Tips for Smooth Title Review and Curative Work
Gather Key Property Documents Early
Collecting deeds, prior settlement statements, surveys, loan documents, and any probate or trust records early in the process helps accelerate title review. When the reviewing attorney or title company has immediate access to relevant records, it reduces the time needed to identify defects and propose remedies. This proactive document gathering also assists in locating possible gaps in the chain of title and clarifying transactions that occurred decades ago. Early organization often prevents last-minute surprises and promotes a more efficient curative timeline.
Communicate with Title Insurance and Lenders
Address Heirship and Probate Matters Proactively
If ownership traces back to informal transfers or a deceased owner, obtaining probate documents, heirship affidavits, or court orders early can prevent lengthy delays. Addressing succession issues proactively clarifies who holds title and removes uncertainty for buyers or lenders. When necessary, taking steps such as opening a probate estate or preparing sworn affidavits helps create a clear public record. Early attention to these matters streamlines curative work and minimizes the chance that unresolved heirship questions will complicate a closing.
Why You Should Consider Title Review and Curative Services
Title review and curative action are essential when there is any question about recorded ownership, outstanding liens, or potential claims that could affect the transfer of property. Parties should consider these services when purchasing older homes, settling estates, refinancing, or when previous conveyances appear incomplete or ambiguous. Addressing problems before closing reduces the risk of future litigation and protects both buyers and lenders from unexpected loss. Proactive title care also helps maintain property value by ensuring a reliable public record of ownership.
Clients should also consider comprehensive curative work when planning long-term property ownership or resale, when the property has a complicated transfer history, or when title searches reveal multiple exceptions. Resolving all known defects can attract more buyers and simplify future financing. Even when immediate sale is not planned, clearing title matters now can prevent costly and time-consuming disputes later. Consulting early with legal counsel and title professionals helps determine whether a limited fix or a broader remediation plan best fits the client’s goals and budget.
Common Situations Where Title Review and Curative Work Are Needed
Common triggers for title review include purchase contracts contingent on clear title, lender requirements, estate settlements, and detection of recorded liens or ambiguous property descriptions. Older properties, parcels with numerous prior owners, or properties that have gone through informal or undocumented transfers often present issues. Other circumstances include boundary disputes, suspected unrecorded easements, or unpaid property taxes. These situations benefit from thorough record examination and, when necessary, coordinated curative steps to ensure the property is marketable and records accurately reflect ownership.
Purchases with Title Exceptions
When a title search reveals exceptions that a buyer or lender finds unacceptable, targeted curative work becomes necessary to allow the closing to proceed. Actions may include obtaining releases, paying off encumbrances, or preparing corrective instruments. Resolving these items promptly avoids delays and keeps the transaction on track. Clear communication about who will address the curative costs, and how those actions affect closing timelines, helps all parties manage expectations and move forward toward completion of the sale.
Estate Transfers with Unclear Heirship
When property passes through informal transfers after an owner’s death, or when estates were not fully probated, records may not clearly show current ownership. In such cases, curative measures like preparing affidavits of heirship, filing required probate documents, or obtaining court determinations of succession may be needed to establish a clear title. Addressing these matters avoids future disputes among heirs and ensures that title companies will have documentation sufficient to insure the transaction without wide exceptions.
Properties with Historical Recording Irregularities
Older or frequently transferred properties may have recording gaps, misspelled names, or improperly executed instruments that obscure chain of title. Curative work for these issues may include corrective deeds, re-recording instruments, or judicial actions to clarify ownership. Resolving historical irregularities helps create a continuous record, which title insurers and buyers look for when evaluating risk. Clearing legacy recording issues enhances the property’s appeal and can remove barriers to financing or future resale.
Local Title Review and Curative Services in Murfreesboro
Jay Johnson Law Firm provides local support for title review and curative matters, combining knowledge of Rutherford County recording practices with practical solutions tailored to each transaction. The firm coordinates directly with title companies, county clerks, lenders, and other parties to move curative steps forward efficiently. Clients receive clear guidance on options, expected timelines, and likely costs. This local focus helps avoid unnecessary delays caused by unfamiliarity with regional procedures and supports timely, reliable closings.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Title Review and Curative Work
Our firm emphasizes thorough document review, consistent communication, and practical solutions that address both immediate closing needs and longer-term marketability. We work closely with clients to explain the nature of recorded defects, the available remedies, and the likely timeline and cost for each option. By coordinating with title companies and lenders, the firm aims to align curative work with closing requirements so transactions move forward as smoothly as possible.
We approach each matter with attention to local recording requirements and customary practices in Rutherford County, minimizing administrative surprises and ensuring corrective instruments are prepared and submitted correctly. The firm helps clients weigh the benefits of limited fixes versus comprehensive remediation and recommends a tailored plan based on the property’s history, the parties’ goals, and lender or insurer expectations. Clear documentation and proper recording are central to every curative action we undertake.
Clients are supported at every stage, from initial records collection through final recording of corrective documents or resolution of disputes. Whether the matter requires coordination for a simple release, drafting corrective conveyances, or pursuing a court-based resolution, the firm works to deliver timely results while keeping clients informed of progress and next steps. The goal is to reduce uncertainty and create a dependable record of ownership for future transactions.
Start Your Title Review and Curative Plan in Murfreesboro Today
How Title Review and Curative Work Is Handled at Our Firm
Our legal process begins with gathering property documents and performing a detailed public-records search to identify potential defects. After preparing a concise title memo, we discuss options with the client and prioritize items that prevent closing. Next, we execute the agreed curative actions, coordinating with lienholders, title insurers, and county offices to secure releases or prepare corrective instruments. If necessary, we prepare filings to resolve disputes. The process concludes when all requisite documents are recorded and a clear title path is established.
Step One: Document Collection and Title Search
The initial phase focuses on assembling the chain of title and related documents to create a comprehensive picture of recorded interests affecting the property. This includes obtaining deeds, mortgages, tax records, plats, and any probate filings. A thorough search identifies recorded liens, judgments, easements, and other encumbrances. The findings are compiled into a report that outlines all items requiring attention, and we review this report with the client to determine the preferred curative path and expected timeline for resolution.
Gathering Public Records and Client Documents
Collecting both public records and any documents the client already has helps create a complete file for review. This may include prior settlement statements, surveys, wills, or trust documents. Combining client-supplied materials with county-recorded instruments reduces the chance of overlooked issues and helps to identify discrepancies. Early organization of documents streamlines the next steps and supports accurate recommendations for curative actions, saving time and cost as the process advances toward resolution.
Preparing the Title Memo and Action Plan
After the search is complete, we prepare a title memo that lists discovered defects and explains the likely remedies for each. The memo outlines recommended priorities, anticipated costs, and estimated timelines based on the nature of the issues and the required recording steps. This action plan allows the client to make an informed decision about whether to pursue a focused fix for a single transaction or a broader remediation that addresses legacy matters to strengthen long-term marketability.
Step Two: Implementing Curative Measures
Once the action plan is approved, we proceed with the curative tasks identified as necessary. This phase can include drafting corrective deeds, requesting releases from lienholders, negotiating settlements, or preparing affidavits to clarify past transactions. In some cases, a quiet title action or court filing is the most appropriate path. Throughout implementation, we coordinate with relevant parties and monitor recording requirements to ensure that corrective documents are accepted and properly entered into the public record.
Administrative Resolutions with Title Companies and Lienholders
Many defects can be resolved through administrative steps, such as obtaining release documents from lienholders or working with title companies to confirm acceptable language for recording. These resolutions often involve negotiation and documentation exchange, and may require payment arrangements or affidavits to remove exceptions. Administrative curative work is typically faster and less costly than litigation, and when successful it clears the way for closing while preserving the parties’ interests.
When Court Action Is Necessary
If administrative measures cannot resolve conflicting claims or longstanding defects, pursuing a court-based solution may be necessary. Filing a quiet title action, seeking declaratory relief, or obtaining a judicial order can provide definitive resolution of ownership disputes. These actions involve additional time and procedural steps, but they create enforceable judgments that clarify title and remove contested claims from the record. The firm guides clients through the litigation path when it is the most reliable route to secure marketable title.
Step Three: Recording and Finalizing the Title Record
After curative documents are prepared or court orders obtained, the final step is recording the corrected instruments with the county register of deeds and ensuring all recordings are properly indexed. Confirmation of recording and distribution of updated documents to title insurers, lenders, and clients completes the process. We also follow up to ensure title policies can be issued with reduced exceptions when appropriate, and that the public record reflects the resolved status of prior defects.
Recording Corrective Instruments
Submitting corrective deeds, satisfactions, releases, and court orders to the county recorder ensures the public record accurately reflects the resolved state of the title. Proper recording includes verifying legal descriptions, signatory authority, and any required notarizations. Ensuring the county office indexes the instruments correctly reduces the chance of future misunderstandings about chain of title. Once recorded, these instruments become part of the permanent public record and support requests for updated title insurance commitments.
Confirming Title Insurance and Closing Readiness
With curative work recorded, the title company and lender can reassess the title status and determine whether insurance commitments can be issued with acceptable exceptions. We assist in providing the necessary documentation to insurers and lenders, and we help clients understand any remaining conditions. Once all parties confirm readiness, the transaction can proceed to closing with greater certainty that the title issues have been addressed and that future transfers will not be hindered by the same defects.
Frequently Asked Questions About Title Review and Curative Work
What is involved in a title review for a property in Murfreesboro?
A title review in Murfreesboro involves searching public records to trace the chain of title and identify recorded encumbrances that could affect a transfer. The review typically examines deeds, mortgages, liens, tax records, easements, and probate filings to create a clear summary of any issues. The findings are documented in a title memo or report that lists exceptions and recommended remedies tailored to the transaction’s needs. This review helps buyers, sellers, and lenders understand the property’s legal status before closing.Following the search, the reviewer discusses the items that require attention and suggests potential curative actions, ranging from obtaining releases to preparing corrective deeds. The goal is to prioritize items that block closing and propose practical solutions that align with lender and title company requirements. Clients receive a clear explanation of the next steps, expected timelines, and likely costs associated with resolving the identified defects.
How long does curative work usually take before closing?
The timeline for curative work varies widely based on the nature and number of defects. Administrative resolutions, such as obtaining releases or drafting corrective deeds, may take a few days to several weeks depending on the responsiveness of lienholders and county offices. When documents are straightforward and parties cooperate, curative steps can often be completed quickly to avoid delaying a closing.If the issues are complex or if court action is necessary, the process can extend for months due to filing requirements, service, and court schedules. Clients are given realistic time estimates after the initial review, and the firm prioritizes actions that will unblock closings while planning longer-term measures if comprehensive remediation is chosen.
Can all title defects be resolved without court involvement?
Many title defects can be resolved without court proceedings through administrative actions such as securing lien releases, executing corrective deeds, or obtaining affidavits clarifying past transfers. These measures are often sufficient when the parties involved are identifiable and willing to cooperate. Administrative resolution is typically faster and less costly than litigation and is the preferred route when possible.However, when records show competing claims, ambiguous transfers, or when necessary parties cannot be found or refuse to sign, court-based remedies like a quiet title action may be required. Litigation provides a definitive judicial determination that clears contested claims and results in an enforceable order clarifying ownership for the public record.
Who typically pays for curative work in a real estate transaction?
Responsibility for curative costs is generally negotiable between buyer and seller and may be allocated in the purchase agreement. In some transactions, sellers agree to handle title defects uncovered by the buyer’s title review as a condition of sale, while in others buyers accept certain fixes or cost-sharing arrangements. Lenders and title insurers may also have requirements that influence who pays and how costs are apportioned to allow financing and insurance to proceed.Clear communication in the purchase contract about which party handles specific curative actions helps avoid disputes later. When curative work is complex or costly, clients should consider the long-term benefits of investing in comprehensive remediation versus a narrow fix limited to the current transaction.
What is a quiet title action and when is it needed?
A quiet title action is a legal proceeding filed in court to resolve competing claims to property and to establish a clear chain of ownership. It is used when recorded documents are conflicting, when prior transfers are ambiguous, or when one or more parties assert claims that cannot be resolved administratively. The court evaluates evidence and issues an order determining the valid owner, which is then recorded to remove clouds on the title.Quiet title actions are more time-consuming and involve additional legal steps, but they provide a definitive resolution when other remedies fail. They are particularly useful for properties with long or complicated histories of conveyance, disputes among heirs, or when essential parties are unavailable to sign corrective instruments.
Will title insurance cover defects found after closing?
Title insurance protects against many covered defects that existed prior to policy issuance but were not discovered in the public records search. If a covered defect materializes after closing, the policy may provide defense and coverage for specified losses, subject to the policy terms and exceptions. However, policies often have exceptions for matters that are discoverable through inspection or are excluded by specific language in the commitment.Because some defects are excluded or require preexisting conditions to be cured, addressing significant recorded issues prior to closing can reduce exceptions and enhance the effectiveness of title insurance. Reviewing the proposed title commitment before closing helps identify items the insurer will exclude and informs decisions about curative work.
How do easements affect property sales and title curative needs?
Easements grant rights to third parties to use a portion of property for a defined purpose, such as access or utilities, and they may affect the owner’s ability to use the land. When an easement is recorded, it becomes a permanent encumbrance until released or legally extinguished. During title review, the presence and scope of easements are examined to determine whether they limit the property in ways that matter to buyers or lenders, and whether curative documentation or clarifying instruments are necessary.Curative work for easement-related issues often focuses on clarifying boundaries, confirming the scope of rights, or documenting releases when an easement has been terminated. Because easements can significantly influence development plans and property value, understanding their terms is an important part of determining whether further action is needed prior to closing.
What documents should I bring for an initial title review?
For an initial title review, bring deeds, prior settlement statements, surveys, and any documents related to mortgages, liens, or probate matters that you already possess. These materials help supplement the public-record search and can reveal discrepancies or transfers that are not immediately obvious from county records alone. Providing as much background documentation as possible speeds the review and helps the reviewer target potential issues more effectively.If you do not have these documents, the firm will obtain public records during the search. Nonetheless, client-supplied documents such as a family will, trust instrument, or previous closing documents can shed light on past transactions and help determine the most efficient curative approach for any identified title concerns.
Can curative work improve the sale price or marketability of my home?
Yes, addressing title defects through curative work can improve a property’s marketability and potentially impact its sale price by removing barriers that might otherwise deter buyers or lenders. A clean, well-documented title makes financing more straightforward and reduces the risk that a buyer will request price concessions or extensive contingencies. Properties with resolved title issues typically attract more competitive offers because buyers perceive lower risk and fewer post-closing disputes.For sellers who plan to hold the property, comprehensive remediation can also add long-term value by ensuring future transactions proceed with less friction. Buyers and lenders both value clear title, and taking action now often prevents negotiating obstacles that can suppress the final sale amount.
How do I start the process of a title review with Jay Johnson Law Firm?
To start the title review process with Jay Johnson Law Firm, contact the office to schedule an initial consultation and provide the property address and any documents you have related to the property. The firm will outline the scope of the review, expected timelines, and an estimate for review and any recommended curative work. Early discussion helps clarify objectives and align the plan with closing or refinancing deadlines.After engagement, the firm will conduct a public-records search, prepare a title memo, and present recommended next steps for curative action if needed. From there, clients decide whether to pursue targeted fixes for a specific transaction or a broader remediation plan to strengthen long-term marketability, and the firm proceeds with the agreed approach.