Title Review and Curative Work Lawyer in Lafayette

Complete Guide to Title Review and Curative Work for Lafayette Property Transactions

If you are buying, selling, or refinancing real estate in Lafayette, a careful title review and curative process can make the difference between a smooth closing and future disputes. This service focuses on identifying defects, liens, ownership gaps, and recorded issues that could cloud title. We review public records, deeds, mortgages, easements, and other relevant instruments to build a clear picture of any risks. When problems appear, curative work aims to resolve them through corrective deeds, affidavits, releases, or quiet title actions so the property can be transferred or financed with confidence.

Title review and curative work is particularly important for older properties, estates, or parcels with complex histories. Even small recording errors, missing signatures, or ambiguous descriptions can create barriers to sale or financing. This practice area helps property owners, buyers, sellers, and lenders understand existing title issues and pursue practical, legally sound steps to clear title. For Lafayette transactions, local knowledge of county recording offices and Tennessee real property law ensures curative measures follow the right procedures to restore marketable title and protect your interest in the property going forward.

Why Title Review and Curative Work Matters for Lafayette Properties

A thorough title review can reveal encumbrances and defects that affect value and transferability, allowing parties to address problems before closing. Benefits include avoiding post-closing disputes, protecting loan approvals, preserving property value, and ensuring clear inheritance paths in estate situations. Curative work restores the chain of title and reduces the risk of future litigation or unexpected liens. Having identified and resolved title problems, parties can proceed with greater certainty, reduce transaction delays, and minimize the chances of costly surprises that can derail closings or create long-term ownership complications.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm’s Approach to Title Review and Curative Matters

Jay Johnson Law Firm, serving clients in Lafayette and across Tennessee from Hendersonville, focuses on practical and thorough legal services for real estate matters. The firm handles title examinations, prepares curative documents, negotiates releases with lienholders, and files necessary pleadings when a court action is required to clear title. Communication, attention to detail, and familiarity with local recording procedures guide our approach. We work with clients, title companies, lenders, and county clerks to resolve issues efficiently so transactions can proceed while protecting client interests and minimizing avoidable delays.

Understanding Title Review and Curative Processes

Title review refers to the systematic examination of public records and property documents to identify any claims, liens, easements, encroachments, or defects that might affect ownership. Curative work describes the legal steps taken to correct or remove these issues. This can involve preparing corrective deeds, obtaining releases or satisfactions, securing affidavits to clarify facts, or initiating quiet title actions in court. Each situation is different, and the proper response depends on the nature of the defect, the goals of the parties, and the historical chain of title revealed during the review.

A title review often begins with a search of deeds, mortgages, judgments, tax records, and other instruments recorded against the property. The review identifies missing links in the chain of title, potential heirs, or recording errors that create gaps. Curative steps are tailored to resolve those specific issues and may include coordination with heirs, lienholders, or municipal offices. The objective is to produce a clear legal record that supports marketable title and satisfies lenders or buyers, reducing the risk of future challenges to ownership or liens that could surface after transfer.

What Title Review and Curative Work Entails

Title review involves collecting and evaluating deeds, mortgages, easements, tax liens, judgments, and other documents that affect property ownership. The goal is to identify any issue that may prevent a clean transfer. Curative work translates findings into corrective action, such as drafting new deeds, obtaining affidavits from parties with knowledge of ownership facts, or negotiating releases from creditors. When informal measures fail, filing a quiet title or other court action may be necessary to obtain a judicial declaration of ownership. These steps restore confidence in the title and allow transactions to proceed.

Key Elements and Typical Curative Steps in Title Work

Common elements include chain of title verification, lien and judgment searches, tax and municipal liens review, and examination of easements or encroachments. Curative processes often begin with outreach to recorders and lienholders, preparation of corrective instruments, and collection of sworn statements or releases from known parties. When documents are missing or parties cannot be located, legal filings such as quiet title actions or publication for unknown heirs may be required. Coordination with title companies and lenders ensures curative work meets closing requirements and helps prevent post-closing claims that could impair ownership rights.

Key Terms and Glossary for Title Review and Curative Work

Understanding common terms helps clients follow the title review process and the curative steps recommended. The glossary below explains frequently encountered concepts such as chains of title, encumbrances, quiet title actions, and deeds used to correct or transfer interest. Clear definitions reduce confusion when discussing options with title companies, lenders, and other parties involved in a transaction. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to evaluate risk, decide on curative steps, and appreciate the timeline and potential costs associated with resolving title matters in Lafayette and Putnam County.

Chain of Title

Chain of title refers to the chronological sequence of conveyances and documents that record ownership of a parcel over time. A complete chain shows each transfer from an original grantor to the present owner, with no unexplained gaps or missing instruments. Gaps in the chain can raise questions about whether past transfers were properly completed or recorded, possibly opening the door to claims from prior owners or heirs. Curative work seeks to reconstruct and document the chain to provide a clear legal record of ownership for future transactions.

Quiet Title

A quiet title action is a court proceeding used to resolve disputes about ownership or to remove clouds on title when informal resolution is not possible. The court examines evidence and issues a judgment establishing the rightful owner or removing adverse claims. These actions may be appropriate when heirs are unknown, when a deed is defective, or when prior liens cannot be resolved through negotiation. Quiet title provides a judicially enforceable declaration that can restore marketability and reassure buyers, lenders, and insurers about the status of the property.

Encumbrance

An encumbrance is any claim, lien, easement, or restriction that limits the owner’s rights or affects the property’s marketability. Common examples include mortgages, tax liens, recorded judgments, utility easements, or restrictive covenants. Some encumbrances are acceptable and disclosed at closing, while others must be removed or addressed through curative measures. The title review identifies encumbrances and recommends action, whether obtaining releases, modifying instruments, or documenting exceptions that will survive the transfer.

Corrective Deed

A corrective deed is a document created to fix an error in a previously recorded deed, such as a misspelled name, incorrect legal description, or omitted signature. By properly preparing, executing, and recording a corrective deed, parties can clarify the chain of title and eliminate ambiguities that might otherwise hinder a transfer or financing. Corrective deeds must reflect accurate facts and be recorded in the appropriate county to provide notice to subsequent purchasers and creditors, reducing the likelihood of future disputes over ownership.

Comparing Limited Title Services and Comprehensive Curative Plans

Options range from a focused title opinion limited to a single closing document review to a comprehensive curative plan that addresses complex defects, unknown heirs, and litigation when required. A limited approach may be suitable for transactions with few or minor issues where a quick resolution suffices. A comprehensive plan provides a full investigation and tailored set of curative steps that resolve deeper or multiple problems and tend to prevent downstream issues. Choosing the right path depends on the property history, the buyer or lender’s tolerance for risk, and the potential consequences of leaving defects unaddressed.

When a Limited Title Review May Be Adequate:

Minor Recording Errors or Single-Document Issues

A limited review is often appropriate when the issue is narrow and straightforward, such as a minor recording error, a misspelled name, or an easily obtained release from a lienholder. In these scenarios, preparing a corrective instrument or obtaining a recorded satisfaction can clear the problem quickly. If the chain of title is otherwise intact and no hidden heirs or adverse claims are likely, a focused review can save time and expense while still addressing the specific defect identified by the title search or requested by a lender.

Transactions with Title Insurance and Clear Records

When a property has a recent title insurance commitment and public records show a clean chain of title, a limited curative review may suffice to resolve isolated issues required by the insurer or lender. In such cases, the title company’s requirements and the lender’s conditions drive the remedial steps, which are typically simple to complete before closing. This approach is efficient where the risk of unknown claims is low and the goal is to close on schedule without undertaking more invasive or costly actions.

Why a Comprehensive Curative Strategy May Be Necessary:

Complex or Historical Title Defects

Comprehensive curative work is appropriate when defects stem from complex history such as missing deeds, unclear inheritance chains, unreleased mortgages, or competing claims that cannot be resolved informally. These situations often require multiple curative instruments, detailed investigation, and possibly court action to secure a definitive title determination. A thorough plan addresses each identified problem, coordinates with affected parties, and pursues the necessary filings to ensure the property can be conveyed without lingering legal uncertainty.

Unknown Heirs or Disputed Ownership Interests

When ownership involves deceased owners with incomplete estate records or potential heirs who cannot be readily located, curative work may include heirship research, notices by publication, and court petitions to confirm ownership interests. Disputed ownership or claims by third parties can also require litigation or negotiated settlements. These more involved steps aim to remove clouds on title permanently and establish a clear ownership record that satisfies buyers, lenders, and the public land records.

Advantages of Choosing a Comprehensive Curative Approach

A comprehensive approach reduces future risk by addressing the full range of potential title defects rather than treating symptoms alone. Resolving problems thoroughly can prevent post-closing disputes, facilitate smoother refinances, and improve marketability for resale. This path is particularly beneficial for high-value transactions, estate settlements, and properties with older or fragmented histories. By documenting curative steps and obtaining court declarations when necessary, owners gain a durable record of title clarity that supports long-term property rights and financial planning.

Comprehensive curative plans also streamline interactions with title insurers and lenders because the record shows deliberate corrective action and legal documentation. That clarity often translates into faster underwriting decisions and fewer exceptions on insurance policies. For sellers and estate fiduciaries, thorough curative work helps finalize transfers with confidence and minimizes exposure to claims. Ultimately, investing in a complete resolution can save money and stress compared to addressing disputes piecemeal at a later date when stakes may be higher and remediation more costly.

Reduced Risk of Future Title Claims

Addressing title defects comprehensively lowers the likelihood that unknown claims or unresolved encumbrances will surface after a sale. By reconstructing the chain of title, obtaining releases, and pursuing court declarations when needed, the record becomes more reliable. This reduction in risk benefits sellers, buyers, and lenders by limiting potential legal exposure. Clear title documentation also supports smoother transactions in the future, helping owners avoid litigation, clouded records, and the disruptions that follow unresolved property disputes.

Improved Marketability and Financing Options

Properties with clean, well-documented title histories attract broader buyer interest and more favorable financing because lenders and insurers prefer minimal exceptions. Comprehensive curative work helps eliminate title problems that could otherwise lead to loan conditions, higher costs, or declined financing. When title is clear and backed by recorded curative instruments or court judgments, buyers gain assurance and sellers can often achieve a quicker sale. This enhanced marketability ultimately supports better outcomes for all transaction parties.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Professional Tips for Title Review and Curative Work

Begin Title Review Early

Start the title review process as early as possible to identify and address potential defects before closing deadlines. Early discovery gives all parties time to obtain releases, prepare corrective instruments, or pursue court remedies if necessary. It reduces the pressure at closing and can prevent last-minute delays that threaten transactions. Early communication with the title company, lender, and opposing parties helps set expectations and allows curative work to proceed methodically rather than under rushed conditions that can lead to avoidable mistakes.

Document and Record All Curative Steps

Keep a thorough record of every curative step, including correspondence, signed releases, affidavits, and recorded instruments. Recording corrective deeds and satisfaction documents in the appropriate county protects the chain of title and provides public notice to future buyers and creditors. Documentation also supports insurance underwriting and lender requirements. A clear paper trail minimizes disputes about what was completed and when, and it serves as valuable evidence should any question arise about the propriety or sufficiency of the curative work performed.

Coordinate with Title Companies and Lenders

Work closely with the title company and lender during curative efforts to ensure that the solutions provided meet underwriting standards and closing conditions. Title companies can identify insurer requirements and exceptions that must be resolved, while lenders can specify the documentation they will accept. This collaborative approach avoids redundant work and ensures curative instruments are drafted and recorded with the appropriate language. Aligning all parties reduces surprises at closing and increases the likelihood of a successful transaction.

Why Property Owners and Buyers Should Consider Title Review and Curative Work

Consider title review and curative work when acquiring property with a complicated history, when an owner is closing an estate, or when a lender identifies title exceptions that must be resolved. These services protect against hidden risks that could lead to liens, ownership disputes, or problems in refinancing. They are also appropriate when title insurance commitments contain exceptions that would affect the buyer’s or lender’s rights. Proactive curative steps help ensure transactions close on schedule and reduce the possibility of future legal complications affecting the property.

Owners preparing to sell or transfer property for estate planning or business reasons also benefit from clearing title ahead of market listing. Resolving issues before a buyer appears increases buyer confidence, expedites closings, and can prevent renegotiations or price reductions due to title concerns. Additionally, curative work can support smoother probate administration by documenting ownership and resolving competing claims, which helps fiduciaries fulfill duties and complete transfers without prolonged litigation or administrative delay.

Common Situations That Require Title Review and Curative Action

Typical circumstances include properties with older or incomplete records, transfers after a death where heirs are unclear, prior foreclosures or tax sales with unresolved issues, and transactions flagged by lenders due to liens or discrepancies in recorded instruments. Other triggers are boundary disputes, unrecorded conveyances, or clerical errors in legal descriptions. Whenever a title search reveals anomalies or exceptions, curative work helps determine whether informal fixes suffice or whether court filings are required to secure a definitive ownership record.

Transactions After Owner Death

When a property owner dies without clear estate documentation, heirship questions can cloud the title. Curative work may involve locating heirs, obtaining affidavits of heirship, or pursuing probate or quiet title proceedings to establish rightful ownership. These steps help ensure that transfers from an estate proceed with proper authority and that buyers or lenders are protected from later claims. Addressing these matters before a sale reduces the risk of post-closing disputes and simplifies the fiduciary’s responsibilities in administering the estate.

Legacy or Long-Standing Recording Errors

Older properties may carry legacy recording errors such as missing acknowledgments, incorrect legal descriptions, or deeds recorded under prior names. Curative measures often include preparing corrective deeds, obtaining sworn affidavits from knowledgeable parties, and recording corrected documents with county offices. In more complex instances, filing a quiet title action may be required to obtain a judicial determination. Resolving these issues restores confidence in the title history and supports future transactions and financing options.

Unreleased Liens or Judgments

Sometimes mortgages, tax liens, or judgments remain listed against a property despite being satisfied. Curative work seeks to obtain recorded releases or satisfactions from lienholders, reconcile tax records, and correct public filings. When lienholders cannot be located, additional steps such as court petitions or title company underwriting adjustments may be necessary. Clearing unreleased encumbrances is critical to obtaining title insurance and lender approval, and it reduces the chance that a latent claim will affect the marketability or financing of the property.

Jay Johnson

Lafayette Real Estate Title Review and Curative Services

Jay Johnson Law Firm provides title review and curative services for clients in Lafayette and across Putnam County, Tennessee. We assist buyers, sellers, fiduciaries, and lenders by evaluating title records, coordinating with title companies, drafting corrective documents, and pursuing court remedies when required. Our goal is to help resolve disputes and record clear ownership so transactions can move forward. We also communicate with county offices and stakeholders to ensure curative measures are properly documented and recorded, supporting secure and marketable property transfers.

Why Clients Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Curative Title Work

Clients choose our firm for a practical, process-driven approach to title review and curative matters. We emphasize clear communication, careful review of public records, and a focus on resolving issues efficiently to meet closing deadlines. Our practice prioritizes producing durable solutions that protect clients from future disputes while coordinating with title companies and lenders to achieve acceptable underwriting outcomes. We tailor recommendations to the circumstances of each property and client goals, balancing thoroughness with the need to move transactions forward.

We deliver hands-on assistance throughout the curative process, including preparing corrective deeds, negotiating releases, and filing necessary court pleadings when warranted. Working directly with county recording offices and other local contacts helps expedite recording and final resolution. Our approach also includes advising clients about the likely timeline and potential costs, so decision-makers can weigh options and plan accordingly. This client-centered coordination reduces stress and helps maintain momentum in complex transactions.

Whether you are resolving issues arising from an estate, correcting legacy problems, or responding to a lender’s title exceptions, our firm works to identify practical pathways to clear title. We combine attention to legal detail with a goal of minimizing disruption to your transaction. For property owners and fiduciaries in Lafayette and neighboring counties, this means actionable guidance, efficient document preparation, and the legal steps needed to ensure clean, recorded ownership for future use or sale.

Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Start Title Review and Curative Work

How the Title Review and Curative Process Works at Our Firm

Our process begins with an initial consultation and review of the title commitment, deeds, and related documents. We identify issues, recommend curative steps, and coordinate with title companies and lenders to confirm requirements. After client approval, we prepare and execute corrective documents, request releases from lienholders, and record necessary instruments. If court action is needed, we prepare pleadings and pursue resolution through the appropriate judicial channels. Regular updates keep clients informed about progress, anticipated timelines, and any decisions that require client input.

Step One: Title Review and Issue Identification

The initial step involves a detailed examination of the title commitment, recorded deeds, mortgages, judgments, and other instruments affecting the property. We look for gaps in the chain of title, undisclosed liens, easements, and irregularities in legal descriptions. This analysis determines whether issues can be resolved with corrective documents or whether more involved measures are necessary. The result is a clear description of defects, proposed curative actions, and an estimated timeline and cost to address each problem identified during the review.

Document Collection and Record Search

We collect relevant documents and perform a search of county records to verify conveyances, liens, and encumbrances. This step may involve pulling older filings, tax records, and recorded judgments that affect title. Locating and reviewing these materials provides the factual basis for curative recommendations. A thorough record search helps identify parties who must sign corrective instruments or whose releases are necessary for clearing encumbrances, and it often reveals whether additional research or court action will be required.

Analysis and Curative Planning

After collecting documents, we analyze the chain of title and prioritize issues by severity and solvability. We prepare a curative plan outlining recommended actions, such as drafting corrective deeds, obtaining releases, or initiating quiet title proceedings. The plan includes expected costs, necessary parties to involve, and a realistic timeline. Sharing this plan with clients and title companies ensures alignment on objectives and sets clear expectations for the curative work ahead.

Step Two: Execution of Curative Measures

Once a curative plan is approved, we prepare and execute the recommended instruments and communications. This may include drafting corrective deeds, obtaining signed affidavits, negotiating lien releases, and coordinating recordings with county clerks. Where parties are missing or unwilling to cooperate, we prepare filings for court to obtain the necessary relief. During execution, we maintain contact with title companies and lenders to confirm that actions meet their requirements and to minimize any outstanding exceptions that would prevent closing.

Preparing and Recording Instruments

Drafting precise, legally sufficient instruments is essential to successful curative work. Corrective deeds, releases, and affidavits must accurately reflect the facts and comply with recording requirements in Putnam County and other relevant jurisdictions. After execution, we ensure timely recording and follow up with county offices to confirm entry into the public record. Proper recording provides notice to future purchasers and lenders and helps prevent the reemergence of previously noted defects.

Negotiation and Coordination with Third Parties

Curative work often requires coordination with lienholders, heirs, or other interested parties to obtain necessary signatures or releases. We negotiate with those parties and their representatives to secure the documentation required to clear title. When negotiations are successful, recorded releases and corrected documents can resolve issues without court involvement. If negotiations fail, we advise on the benefits of court remedies and prepare the necessary filings to achieve a definitive resolution.

Step Three: Judicial Remedies and Finalization

If informal remedies are insufficient, we pursue judicial remedies such as quiet title actions, petitions for declaratory judgment, or other filings necessary to clear clouds on title. The court process can address unknown heirs, competing claims, or unresolved liens by providing a binding determination. Upon resolution, we record the court orders and any corrective instruments to create a clear public record. Finalization includes coordinating with title insurers and lenders to close the transaction with the appropriate title coverage and minimal exceptions.

Filing Court Actions When Required

When nonjudicial solutions are not feasible, court filings establish legal clarity. Quiet title or declaratory judgment actions compel resolution of competing claims and establish a judicially enforceable ownership determination. These actions typically involve preparing pleadings, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence to the court. Although longer and more formal than administrative steps, court actions often provide the definitive resolution needed to secure marketable title and move forward with the transaction.

Recording Judicial Outcomes and Closing Support

After a favorable court judgment, we ensure all orders and supplemental documents are recorded to reflect the updated ownership status. We then coordinate with counsel, title insurers, and lenders to confirm that the curative objectives are satisfied and to facilitate closing. Recording the outcome and producing the necessary documentation supports long-term marketability and protects parties from renewed claims, providing the stability buyers, sellers, and lenders require for future transactions.

Frequently Asked Questions About Title Review and Curative Work

What is title curative work and when is it necessary?

Title curative work refers to the legal steps taken to correct defects, gaps, or clouds in a property’s chain of title. It is necessary when a title search reveals issues such as missing signatures, unresolved liens, inaccurate legal descriptions, or unclear transfers that could interfere with a sale or financing. Curative measures include preparing corrective deeds, obtaining releases from lienholders, collecting affidavits, and, when necessary, initiating court proceedings to obtain a definitive ownership determination. Deciding on curative steps depends on the nature of the defect and the goals of the parties. Minor recording errors may be addressed with a corrective deed or recorded affidavit, while more complex claims involving unknown heirs or competing interests may require a quiet title action. The process aims to create a clean public record that supports marketability and lender requirements.

The timeline for title review and curative work varies based on the complexity of issues identified. A simple review and corrective recording may be completed in a few weeks, while locating lienholders or obtaining releases can extend the timeline. When court action is necessary, the process can take several months depending on court schedules, service requirements, and any contested issues. Prompt initiation of the review and clear communication with title companies and lenders helps streamline the process. Early detection of problems provides more options and reduces the likelihood of last-minute delays related to closings or financing approvals.

Title insurance provides protection against many covered title defects that were not discovered during the title search, but policies often contain exceptions and may require curative steps before full coverage is available. Insurers may require releases or corrected recordings to remove exceptions that would otherwise affect the policy. Understanding the title commitment and the insurer’s exceptions is essential to determine what curative work is necessary. In some instances, insurers will underwrite coverage after specified curative instruments are recorded. In other situations, certain defects may not be insurable without a judicial determination, so curative work and insurer guidance should proceed in tandem to achieve acceptable coverage for the transaction.

When an heir cannot be located, curative options include published notices, appointment of a guardian ad litem in certain proceedings, or pursuing a court action that authorizes distribution or clearance after required notice efforts. The court process allows for legally adequate notice to unknown or missing parties and can grant relief when diligent attempts to find heirs have been documented. Heirship research and outreach are the preferred first steps, but when those efforts fail, courts can permit curative resolutions that minimize risk for buyers and lenders. Each case requires careful attention to notice requirements and procedural steps under Tennessee law to ensure any judicial resolution is binding.

In some cases, a property may be marketed or sold while curative actions are in progress if the buyer and lender accept certain conditions or if title insurance can be issued subject to specific exceptions. Transparency about outstanding issues and a clear plan for completion help buyers and lenders make informed decisions. However, many buyers and lenders prefer curative work to be completed prior to closing to avoid lingering exceptions that could affect financing or future ownership. Discussing options with the title company and lender early allows parties to determine acceptable conditions for closing. When possible, resolving title defects before a sale reduces risk and supports a more straightforward transaction.

Costs for curative work depend on the issues encountered. Simple corrective recordings and document preparation involve modest legal and recording fees, while negotiating releases or conducting heirship research increases costs. If court actions are needed, fees can include filing costs, service expenses, and attorney time for litigation, increasing the overall expense. The most effective approach balances the likely cost against the value of resolving the defect and the risk of leaving issues unaddressed. We provide clients with an initial assessment and estimated costs after a title review, helping to set expectations and plan for the most practical path forward. In many cases, investing in curative work earlier prevents larger costs later if disputes arise.

Yes. Curative deeds, releases, and other corrective instruments must generally be recorded in the county where the property is located to provide proper public notice. Recording in the correct county ensures that subsequent searches reflect the updated information and that the chain of title is preserved for future transactions. Proper recording practices are essential to protect buyer and lender interests. We coordinate with county clerks and register offices to confirm recording requirements and follow up to ensure documents are entered into the public record. Accurate recording reduces the risk of future disputes over ownership or encumbrances.

A quiet title action becomes necessary when informal negotiation or corrective recordation cannot resolve competing claims, unknown heirs, or serious defects in the chain of title. These judicial proceedings allow a court to determine rightful ownership and remove clouds that cannot be cleared by private agreement. Quiet title actions provide a binding judgment that future purchasers and lenders can rely on. The decision to pursue a quiet title action weighs the strength of competing claims, the availability of interested parties, and the expected benefits relative to costs. When a definitive judicial determination is needed to restore marketability, filing with the court is the appropriate course.

Curative work can significantly affect refinancing by addressing title exceptions that lenders require to be cleared before new loans are approved. Lenders typically demand clear title or documented resolutions for certain exceptions, and recording releases or corrective deeds can satisfy those requirements. Completing curative steps prior to seeking refinance helps prevent underwriting delays and additional conditions. If curative issues remain unresolved, lenders may decline financing or require higher underwriting standards. Coordinating curative work with the lender and title company ensures the documentation produced meets the underwriting criteria and supports a smoother refinancing process.

To start a title review, provide the property address and any existing title commitment, deed, or related documents to the firm. We will review the materials, perform a records search if needed, and provide an assessment of any issues discovered and recommended curative steps. An initial consultation sets expectations for timeline and cost so you can make informed decisions about next steps. Early engagement is helpful, especially when a closing date or financing timeline is involved. Prompt review allows for efficient resolution if problems are found and reduces the likelihood of closing delays or last-minute complications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call