A Practical Guide to Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Agreements in Obion County
Noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements play an important role for Tennessee employers and employees who want clear expectations about business relationships and competitive activity. Whether you are drafting an agreement to protect trade relationships and client lists or reviewing a clause proposed by an employer, understanding how these agreements function under Tennessee law is essential. This page explains what these agreements can reasonably cover in Obion County and how a thoughtful approach to drafting or negotiation can reduce the risk of disputes, promote enforceability, and protect your business interests or employment opportunities.
Employment-related restrictions must balance legitimate business interests and the rights of employees to earn a living. In Tennessee courts, courts look at reasonableness in scope, duration, and geographic reach when considering enforceability. This guide provides practical considerations for employers creating agreements and for employees asked to sign them. It outlines common clauses, potential legal limits, and the steps parties may take to clarify terms. If you have concerns about an agreement in Obion County, informed decisions and well-documented negotiations can make a meaningful difference in how a dispute could unfold.
Why Address Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Issues Early
Addressing noncompetition and nonsolicitation matters proactively prevents many disputes before they start. For businesses, clear and enforceable agreements help preserve client relationships, protect confidential information and reduce the likelihood of unfair competition after an employee leaves. For employees, careful review can avoid overly broad restrictions that hamper future job opportunities. Early review and carefully written terms provide certainty, can lower the cost of future litigation, and increase the chances that any necessary restrictions will be upheld if challenged in Obion County or elsewhere in Tennessee.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Business Agreements
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves business clients and employees across Tennessee with practical legal assistance in drafting, negotiating and defending noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements. The firm emphasizes clear communication and realistic legal strategies grounded in Tennessee law. We work directly with clients to identify the legitimate business interests at stake, craft language that aligns with those interests, and advise on fair durations and geographic limits. The goal is to create agreements that are defensible while allowing parties to move forward with confidence in their business relationships and workforce planning.
Understanding Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Agreements in Tennessee
Noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements are contracts that restrict certain business or employment activities for defined periods and within specified areas. In Tennessee, courts enforce reasonable restraints that protect legitimate business interests, such as trade secrets, customer relationships and goodwill. These agreements are evaluated for duration, geographic scope, and the specific activities restricted. When drafting or reviewing these documents, parties should focus on narrowly tailored provisions that address documented business needs while minimizing unnecessary burdens on an individual’s ability to work and earn a living.
Different types of agreements serve different purposes: noncompete provisions generally bar a former employee from engaging in competing business activity, while nonsolicitation provisions typically prevent solicitation of former clients or employees. Courts may treat those provisions differently based on the facts. Careful negotiation can produce practical solutions, such as narrowing definitions of clients, limiting duration to a reasonable period, or including carve-outs that allow certain types of work. Thoughtful drafting increases the likelihood that a court will view the restrictions as fair and enforceable in Obion County.
What These Agreements Mean and How They Operate
A noncompete agreement restricts a party from competing with a business for a set time and area; a nonsolicitation agreement restricts the solicitation of clients, customers or employees. Both are preventative tools intended to protect investments in client lists, training and confidential information. The exact wording matters: overbroad language can render a clause unenforceable, while precise definitions tied to demonstrable interests strengthen enforceability. Parties should define the restricted activities, identify covered customers or employees, and set a clear time frame so expectations are transparent and legally defensible.
Key Elements to Include and Practical Steps in Negotiation
Effective agreements identify the legitimate business interest being protected, specify restricted activities in concrete terms, set reasonable time limits, and define the geographic area covered. Practical steps include reviewing job duties, documenting access to confidential information, and assessing the commercial reach of the business. Employers should ensure consideration is provided for employees and keep records of negotiation and business needs. Employees should seek clarity on ambiguous terms and consider negotiating narrower restrictions or compensation adjustments to reduce the risk of later disputes.
Key Terms and a Short Glossary for Noncompete Matters
Understanding common terms helps both employers and employees assess the reach of an agreement. Knowing definitions such as trade secret, geographic scope, solicitation, and consideration makes it easier to evaluate whether a clause is reasonable. This glossary provides plain-language explanations of frequent terms and how they apply in practice. Clear definitions within an agreement reduce ambiguity and the risk of litigation, while giving parties a shared baseline for negotiating reasonable and enforceable provisions under Tennessee law.
Trade Secret
A trade secret is confidential information that gives a business a competitive advantage and is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. Examples include customer lists, pricing strategies, proprietary processes and customer preferences. In Tennessee, trade secret protection can justify lawful restrictions when the information is not readily ascertainable by others. When a noncompete or nonsolicitation agreement references trade secrets, it should describe the types of information protected and the measures taken to keep that information confidential to support the restriction’s reasonableness.
Consideration
Consideration refers to what each party receives in exchange for agreeing to restrictions. For existing employees, continued employment can sometimes constitute consideration, but the adequacy of consideration can vary depending on timing and jurisdiction. In some cases, additional compensation or benefits are provided in exchange for signing a restrictive agreement. Clear documentation of consideration helps support enforceability and demonstrates that both parties entered into the agreement with an exchange of value that makes the contract legally binding.
Nonsolicitation
A nonsolicitation clause prevents a former employee from directly reaching out to or attempting to divert the employer’s clients, customers or employees. Unlike a total ban on competition, nonsolicitation clauses are often more narrowly focused on preventing targeted outreach to a company’s contacts. When drafted with clear definitions of who counts as a protected client or which employees are covered, these clauses tend to be more defensible because they address specific harms without broadly limiting a person’s ability to work in the industry.
Geographic Scope
Geographic scope defines the physical area in which restrictions apply. Reasonable geographic limits align with where the employer actually conducts business or draws customers. Overly broad geographic restrictions that extend well beyond a company’s market area are less likely to be enforced. Effective agreements tie geographic limits to demonstrated business needs, such as a regional customer base or service territory, to increase the chance that a court will view the restraint as proportionate to the interests being protected.
Comparing Limited Clauses and Comprehensive Restrictions
When choosing how to restrict post-employment activity, parties often weigh limited, narrowly tailored clauses against broader comprehensive arrangements. A limited approach focuses on the most sensitive assets, such as specific clients or trade secrets, and tends to be easier to enforce. A comprehensive restriction attempts to cover a wider range of competitive activities and may be more difficult to justify. The right approach depends on the nature of the business, the role of the employee, and the geographic and temporal reach needed to protect legitimate interests without imposing undue hardship.
When Narrow Restrictions Make Sense:
Protecting Specific Client Relationships
A limited approach is often sufficient when a business seeks to protect a small set of high-value client relationships or narrowly defined confidential information. For roles focused on a particular territory or client portfolio, a clause that prevents solicitation of those named clients for a reasonable period protects the company’s investment in those relationships without unduly restricting a departing employee’s ability to find other work. Precise definitions and a short, measurable duration increase fairness and enforceability in Tennessee.
Roles with Limited Access to Proprietary Data
When an employee’s access to confidential information is limited, a narrowly drawn restriction focused on that material may adequately protect the business interest. For example, restrictions that address specific client lists or certain account records allow employees to pursue other opportunities while safeguarding the company’s most sensitive assets. This balance reduces the scope of potential litigation and signals to courts that the employer sought only what was necessary to preserve its legitimate competitive interests.
When Broader Protection Is Appropriate:
Protecting Wide-Ranging Business Investments
Comprehensive restrictions may be appropriate for senior-level employees with broad responsibilities, extensive access to confidential systems, or authority over client development across many markets. In these situations, broader limits on competitive activities and solicitation are intended to protect investments in client relationships, intellectual property, and proprietary processes that span regions or product lines. Careful drafting can make broader protections more defensible by tying restrictions to demonstrable business needs and limiting duration to what is reasonable under the circumstances.
Guarding Against Coordinated Departures
If a business faces the risk of coordinated departures that could disrupt operations or take a large portion of the workforce and client base, broader provisions may be warranted. Clauses addressing solicitation of employees and key clients, along with confidentiality protections, help preserve stability during sensitive transitions. Drafting that documents the risk and links each restriction to a specific, demonstrable interest reduces the chance that a court will view the terms as overly broad and increases the likelihood that the restrictions will be enforced if challenged.
Benefits of a Carefully Crafted, Broad Agreement
A well-constructed comprehensive agreement can provide peace of mind for business owners by protecting investment in customer relationships, preventing the loss of confidential information, and reducing the risk of immediate competition from departing employees. For certain positions, broad but reasonably defined restrictions help maintain goodwill and business continuity. When these provisions are closely tied to defined legitimate interests, they also create clearer expectations for employees about permitted activities and responsibilities after departure.
Comprehensive agreements can also streamline enforcement by consolidating protections into a single contract that addresses confidentiality, nonsolicitation of clients and employees, and reasonable noncompetition limits. This integrated approach reduces ambiguity and may reduce the scope of litigation by making the protected interests and prohibited activities clear. Employers should balance comprehensiveness with clarity and proportionality so the restrictions remain practical and defensible under Tennessee law.
Preserving Client Relationships and Confidential Business Information
Comprehensive agreements that clearly define what constitutes a protected client or confidential information help prevent misappropriation and diversion of business. When these definitions reflect how the company operates and are limited in time and geography, they reduce the risk of workforce-driven client loss. Employers that document the connection between the protected information and their business model are better positioned to maintain continuity and to seek remedies if a departing employee attempts to use proprietary information to compete unfairly.
Reducing Uncertainty and Litigation Risk
Clear, comprehensive agreements minimize ambiguity about permitted conduct after separation and can decrease the likelihood of disputes. By setting expectations and documenting business interests, these agreements can deter harmful conduct and provide a defined basis for seeking injunctive or legal relief if needed. Employers that take care to align restrictions with documented business needs and reasonable durations are more likely to avoid costly litigation and to defend their position effectively if a challenge arises in Tennessee courts.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Obion County noncompete attorney
- nonsolicitation agreements Tennessee
- noncompete enforcement Obion
- employee restrictive covenants Tennessee
- drafting noncompete agreement Obion County
- review noncompete agreement Hendersonville attorney
- trade secret protection Tennessee
- employment agreement negotiation Obion
- nonsolicitation clause review
Practical Tips for Employers and Employees
Define Protected Interests Narrowly
Be precise about what you are protecting by identifying specific client lists, categories of confidential information, or defined territories. Narrow definitions make a clause easier to justify and enforce, and reduce the likelihood that a court will view the restriction as overbroad. Employers should document the business reasons for protection, while employees should request clarification for ambiguous language. Precise drafting avoids unnecessary limits on an individual’s future work prospects and improves predictability for both parties.
Limit Duration and Geographic Reach
Document Consideration and Negotiation
Record what each party receives in exchange for agreeing to restrictions and, if possible, memorialize any negotiation that explains why a clause is necessary. Evidence of consideration and contemporaneous documentation help show the agreement was a voluntary and informed exchange. For existing employees, consider offering additional compensation or benefits tied to the agreement. Clear records reduce future disputes about whether the contract was validly executed and whether the restrictions are justified.
When to Seek Help With Noncompete or Nonsolicitation Agreements
Businesses and employees should seek review when a proposed agreement could affect future employment or significant business relationships. For employers, this is especially important when hiring employees who will have access to sensitive information or client contacts. For employees, the review matters when a restriction may limit career mobility or conflict with future plans. A timely review helps ensure the terms are proportional, documented, and explained so both sides know what to expect and can negotiate reasonable adjustments as needed.
Other reasons to consider professional review include preparing to enforce an existing agreement, responding to a former employee’s departure that may threaten client relationships, or adjusting agreements after a merger or change in business operations. Reviewing agreements after a role changes or after relocation ensures restrictions still match the business reality. Proactive attention reduces the chance of surprise disputes and can help preserve value for the company while protecting individuals’ employment prospects.
Common Situations That Lead Parties to Seek Agreement Review or Drafting
Typical circumstances include hiring employees with client-facing roles, protecting software code or proprietary processes, managing key account transitions, or responding to an employee’s departure to a competitor. Companies may also revisit agreements after acquisitions, restructurings, or expansions into new geographic markets. Employees often seek review when offered a new agreement or when considering new employment that could conflict with an existing restriction. Each situation benefits from tailored assessment to determine appropriate and reasonable protections.
Hiring for Client-Facing Positions
When recruiting salespeople, account managers or business development staff, employers often need protections that prevent immediate solicitation of key clients. Drafting clauses that focus on specific accounts or territories allows businesses to protect relationships without unnecessarily limiting a new hire’s broader career opportunities. Clear definitions of named accounts and reasonable duration tied to the client lifecycle make enforcement more likely and create predictable outcomes for both employer and employee.
Protecting Proprietary Processes or Software
Employers that develop proprietary software, manufacturing techniques or other confidential processes have a legitimate interest in preventing unauthorized use by former employees. Agreements that protect the information and restrict direct competitive use or disclosure for a reasonable period are commonly used. The protections should be tailored to the scope of the information and include confidentiality clauses, limiting access, and clearly defining what is considered proprietary to avoid disputes about what can or cannot be used after separation.
Responding to Senior Employee Departures
When a senior employee with broad client relationships or managerial responsibilities leaves, the potential for client or staff solicitation increases. Employers may seek temporary restrictions to maintain business stability during the transition. Drafting that ties the restrictions to demonstrable harms and sets reasonable timelines can protect the business while allowing the departing individual to pursue new opportunities once the sensitive period passes. Documentation of the employee’s role and the relationships at risk supports the need for measured limitations.
Local Assistance for Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Matters in Obion
Jay Johnson Law Firm assists clients in Obion County and throughout Tennessee with practical guidance on noncompetition and nonsolicitation matters. Whether you need a review of a proposed agreement, help drafting tailored restrictions, or defense against a potential enforcement action, the firm focuses on clear communication and actionable advice. We explain the likely legal considerations in Tennessee, discuss realistic outcomes, and help you determine the best path forward to protect business interests or preserve employment options in a way that aligns with state law.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Your Agreement Needs
Jay Johnson Law Firm offers practical counsel for drafting and negotiating employment and business agreements, with attention to Tennessee law and Obion County practice. The firm emphasizes advance planning to avoid disputes and thoughtful drafting that addresses real business needs without imposing unnecessary restrictions. Clients receive straightforward explanations of legal risks, likely outcomes, and strategies to resolve disagreements or strengthen agreements in anticipation of potential challenges.
We help business owners document legitimate interests and select language that is narrowly tailored to those interests, improving the likelihood of enforceability. For employees, we review offers to identify overly broad terms, explain potential consequences, and negotiate modifications where appropriate. The focus is on practical solutions—drafting clear agreements, communicating expectations, and documenting the rationale so that both sides can move forward with minimized legal risk.
Our approach includes assessing the company’s operational footprint and the employee’s role to determine appropriate durations and geographic limits. We also assist with related documents such as confidentiality agreements and separation agreements to ensure consistency and reduce ambiguity. The goal is to create balanced contracts that protect legitimate commercial interests while maintaining fair opportunities for employees to pursue their careers.
Contact Us to Discuss Your Noncompete or Nonsolicitation Concerns
How We Handle Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Matters
Our process begins with a focused review of the agreement or the situation, identifying key terms and the business interests at stake. We then discuss potential revisions or defenses, recommend negotiation strategies, and, if necessary, prepare documentation to support enforcement or challenge an unreasonable restriction. Communication and documentation are central to our approach, and we keep clients informed of realistic options and timelines so they can make decisions that align with their practical and legal goals.
Step One: Initial Review and Fact Gathering
The first step involves gathering all relevant documents and facts, including the current agreement, job description, compensation records, and history of client assignments. This background allows us to analyze the scope of the restriction, the identified business interests, and potential vulnerabilities. Clear documentation of the employee’s duties and the employer’s operations helps determine appropriate boundaries and prepares the parties for negotiation or litigation if needed.
Document Review and Risk Assessment
We examine contract language to identify ambiguous or overbroad terms, assess whether the restrictions align with the employee’s role, and evaluate potential defenses or enforcement risks. This assessment includes checking the duration, geographic scope and specific prohibitions to determine how a Tennessee court might view the agreement. The goal is to map out realistic outcomes and suggest targeted revisions that improve clarity and proportionality without sacrificing important protections.
Fact-Finding and Interviewing Relevant Parties
Collecting factual information from relevant parties clarifies what confidential information the employee accessed and which client relationships were maintained. Interviews and documentation help link restrictions to demonstrable business interests. This factual record supports negotiation and, if necessary, demonstrates to a court why particular restrictions are appropriate. Accurate fact-finding reduces surprises and ensures any suggested revisions are grounded in the operational reality of the business.
Step Two: Drafting and Negotiation
Following review, we propose language changes or alternative arrangements designed to balance protection with reasonableness. Negotiations can include narrowing definitions, adjusting timeframes, or adding carve-outs to permit certain types of work. The objective is to reach an agreement that protects legitimate interests while limiting unnecessary restrictions on employment. Well-documented negotiation and mutual concessions increase the likelihood that the agreement will be accepted and, if necessary, supported by a court.
Proposing Targeted Revisions
Targeted revisions may refine definitions of clients, limit the geographic reach, shorten durations, or clarify what information is considered confidential. These revisions reduce ambiguity and demonstrate proportionality. By tying each restriction to a specific, documented interest, the agreement becomes more defensible. Employers and employees benefit from precise language that reflects actual business practices and reduces the chance of future disagreement about the scope of prohibited conduct.
Negotiation and Settlement Discussions
Negotiation may involve providing additional consideration, adjusting restrictive terms, or agreeing to transitional provisions that ease the impact on an employee. Settlement discussions can resolve disputes before litigation and preserve business relationships. Agreeing to reasonable limits and documenting the rationale behind changes creates stability and lowers the cost of future enforcement. Both sides benefit when negotiations focus on measurable interests and clear, enforceable terms.
Step Three: Enforcement and Litigation Strategies
If negotiation does not resolve the matter, we prepare enforcement or defense strategies based on the factual record and legal analysis. This may include seeking injunctive relief to prevent imminent harm or mounting a defense that challenges the reasonableness of restrictions. The strategy is tailored to the client’s goals—preserving business assets, protecting the right to earn a living, or reaching a pragmatic settlement. Thorough preparation and documentation are key to achieving favorable outcomes.
Preparing for Court or Alternative Dispute Resolution
Preparation includes compiling evidence of trade secret protection, documenting client relationships and quantifying harm. Where possible, we explore alternative dispute resolution to reach a commercially sensible settlement that minimizes disruption. If litigation is necessary, detailed documentation supports requests for injunctive relief and bolsters arguments about the necessity and reasonableness of restrictions. Careful case-building improves the chances of obtaining a result that aligns with the client’s practical objectives.
Post-Resolution Steps and Compliance Monitoring
After resolving a dispute or negotiating a revised agreement, ongoing compliance monitoring and clear communication help prevent future conflicts. Employers may implement training, access controls, and recordkeeping to protect confidential information, while employees should understand the boundaries of permissible activity. Documentation of post-resolution agreements and periodic reviews ensure the protections remain aligned with current business realities and reduce the risk of recurring disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Noncompete and Nonsolicitation Agreements
Are noncompete agreements enforceable in Tennessee?
Tennessee courts will enforce noncompete agreements that are reasonable in scope, duration and geographic reach and that protect legitimate business interests like trade secrets and customer relationships. Whether a particular clause is enforceable depends on the specific facts, including the employee’s role, the nature of the protected interest, and whether the restriction is narrowly tailored to prevent unfair competition rather than to block ordinary employment.Parties should focus on clear documentation that explains why the restriction is necessary and ties the limitation to actual business needs. Reasonable durations and geographic boundaries supported by business facts increase the chance that a court will uphold the restriction. If you have questions about a specific agreement, a careful review can help you assess enforceability and possible next steps.
What is the difference between a noncompete and a nonsolicitation agreement?
A noncompete prohibits a former employee from engaging in competing business activity for a set time and within a defined area, while a nonsolicitation clause prevents direct outreach to an employer’s clients, customers or employees. Nonsolicitation provisions are typically narrower and therefore more likely to be viewed as reasonable, because they target specific interactions rather than barring competition altogether.In practice, employers may use nonsolicitation clauses when they want to protect relationships without barring an individual from working in the same industry. Clear definitions of what constitutes solicitation and which clients or employees are covered make these clauses more predictable and easier to enforce under Tennessee law.
How long can a noncompete last in Tennessee?
There is no fixed statutory limit on how long a noncompete can last in Tennessee, but courts evaluate whether a duration is reasonable in light of the business interest being protected. Typical enforceable durations often range from several months to a few years, depending on the industry, the employee’s role and the rate at which customer relationships or confidential advantages diminish over time.When reviewing or negotiating a noncompete, consider aligning the length with the actual time needed to protect client relationships or recover training investments. Shorter, well-supported durations are more likely to be upheld and help avoid unnecessary constraints on an employee’s future employment.
Can an employer change the terms of a noncompete after hiring?
Employers can modify agreements when both parties agree to the changes and appropriate consideration is provided, but unilateral changes to restrictive covenants after hiring can raise enforceability concerns. If an employer attempts to impose new restrictions without the employee’s consent or without offering consideration, a court may find the modification invalid or unenforceable.When changes are necessary, documenting mutual agreement and providing some form of consideration—such as a raise, bonus, or other tangible benefit—helps demonstrate that the revised agreement is a valid contract. Transparency and documentation reduce disputes about whether the change was voluntary and supported by value.
What should an employee do if asked to sign a restrictive covenant?
If you are asked to sign a restrictive covenant, take time to review and understand the terms before agreeing. Pay special attention to definitions of restricted activities, the listed duration, geographic scope, and any carve-outs or exceptions. If anything is unclear or seems overly broad, request clarification or propose revisions that narrow the language to reflect actual job duties and business realities.Negotiation can include adjustments to the time period, geographic limits, or scope of prohibited activities, and may include additional consideration. Do not sign under pressure; instead, document any proposed changes and seek advice so you know how the agreement could affect your future employment options and rights under Tennessee law.
Can a nonsolicitation clause prevent indirect solicitation?
Nonsolicitation clauses can be drafted to address both direct and indirect solicitation, but courts will examine the language for clarity and reasonableness. Indirect solicitation language that is overly broad may be challenged as vague or restricting innocent behavior. To be enforceable, the clause should describe the kinds of indirect approaches it covers and provide clear examples if necessary.Employers seeking protection should draft specific definitions of prohibited conduct, such as using intermediaries to contact clients or encouraging employees to leave. Employees should seek precise language so they understand which actions are restricted and when permitted activities fall outside the clause.
How does consideration affect enforceability?
Consideration is the value exchanged to make a contract binding and is an important factor in the enforceability of restrictive covenants. For new hires, an offer of employment accompanied by a restrictive covenant typically constitutes consideration. For current employees, continued employment can sometimes be considered sufficient, but courts may require additional or fresh consideration, especially when restrictions are introduced mid-employment.Documenting the consideration—such as a signing bonus, promotion, or other benefits—helps support the enforceability of the agreement. Clear records of what was offered and accepted reduce the risk of later disputes about whether the covenant is a valid and binding contract.
What remedies are available if a former employee violates an agreement?
Remedies for breach may include injunctive relief to stop ongoing violations and monetary damages for proven losses. Injunctive relief is often sought when immediate action is necessary to prevent loss of customers or disclosure of confidential information. Courts weigh the likelihood of harm and the balance of equities when deciding whether to issue such relief.Collecting damages may require proof of actual harm or lost profits, and remedies can vary based on the facts and contract terms. In many cases, parties resolve disputes through negotiated settlements or alternative dispute resolution to limit business disruption and expense.
How can employers protect trade secrets without broad restrictions?
Employers can protect trade secrets through well-drafted confidentiality agreements, access controls, employee training and documented policies that restrict disclosure. Narrowly tailored nondisclosure provisions that define what constitutes proprietary information and require employees to safeguard it often provide robust protection without needing very broad noncompetition clauses.Combining confidentiality measures with targeted nonsolicitation provisions and reasonable noncompetition limits, where necessary, creates layered protection. This approach focuses enforcement on truly sensitive information and reduces the burden on employees while preserving the employer’s ability to seek remedies if confidential information is misused.
Do geographic limits need to match where the business operates?
Geographic limits should generally reflect where the employer actually does business or draws customers. Restrictions that extend beyond the company’s operational footprint are more likely to be deemed unreasonable. Tying the geographic scope to documented markets or service territories increases the likelihood that a court will view the restraint as proportionate to the interest being protected.When a business operates in multiple regions, geographic scope may need to be broader, but each expansion should be justified by demonstrable business activities in those particular areas. Clear evidence of where the employer competes helps courts assess whether the geographic reach is appropriate under Tennessee law.