
Comprehensive Guide to Operating Agreements and Corporate Bylaws in Etowah
Operating agreements and bylaws set the foundation for how a business is governed and how owners relate to one another. For companies in Etowah and throughout McMinn County, clear governing documents reduce conflict, clarify decision making, and protect the long term stability of the business. This introduction explains why drafting these documents carefully matters for any business owner, whether forming a new company or revising existing paperwork. The following sections walk through what these agreements do, common pitfalls to avoid, and practical steps to create records that reflect the owners’ intentions while staying aligned with Tennessee law and local business practices.
Many owners underestimate how much friction unclear rules can create inside a company. Without written operating agreements or bylaws, disputes about voting, distributions, management authority, and successor arrangements can escalate and become costly. This paragraph describes how having tailored governing documents can prevent misunderstandings, preserve value, and make transitions smoother when ownership changes or new managers are appointed. It also highlights that these documents are living records that should be reviewed and amended as the business grows, new partners join, or economic conditions shift, so they remain practical and enforceable for the company’s needs.
Why Strong Operating Agreements and Bylaws Matter for Your Business
Well drafted operating agreements and bylaws provide predictability and stability for business owners, managers, and investors. They outline how decisions are made, how profits are shared, and what happens when a member or shareholder departs. This clarity reduces the risk of internal disputes and supports smoother lender and investor relationships by demonstrating solid governance. In addition, these documents help enforce duties among parties and establish procedures for conflict resolution. For businesses in Etowah, having governance documents that reflect both business goals and Tennessee statutory requirements strengthens legal protections while enabling practical day to day operations.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Business Governance
Jay Johnson Law Firm works with local business owners across Tennessee to create clear, practical governing documents that match each companys structure and goals. Our approach is to listen to the owners’ priorities, analyze the business context, and draft agreements that address control, compensation, transfer restrictions, and dispute resolution. We focus on creating straightforward language that clients can use confidently while remaining compliant with state law. For businesses in Etowah and surrounding communities, we aim to deliver documents that reduce ambiguity and support long term success without creating unnecessary complexity or cost.
Understanding Operating Agreements and Bylaws: Purpose and Scope
Operating agreements and bylaws serve distinct but related functions depending on whether a business is organized as an LLC or a corporation. These documents set out governance rules, allocate rights and responsibilities among owners, and record procedures for meetings, voting, and managing the business. They also address financial matters like distributions and capital contributions. This section explains the role these documents play in daily operations and long term planning, and why tailoring them to the company’s specific ownership, industry, and growth plans matters more than adopting a generic template.
Although templates are available online, relying solely on a generic form can leave gaps that create conflict or fail to protect owner interests. Local legal counsel can identify which clauses matter most for your business, such as buyout provisions, transfer restrictions, fiduciary expectations, or special voting arrangements. Additionally, well written governance documents can help preserve limited liability protections by showing that the business operates as a distinct entity. The goal is to create a document package that supports clear governance while remaining flexible enough to accommodate future changes and growth.
Definitions: Operating Agreements Versus Corporate Bylaws
An operating agreement is the primary governance document for an LLC and describes how members will operate the company, share profits, and make decisions. Corporate bylaws, on the other hand, detail how a corporation will be managed, including the role of the board of directors, officer duties, and shareholder meeting procedures. Both documents complement statutory filings and help convert informal understandings into enforceable terms. This explanation clarifies when each document is used, which provisions are typical, and how they interact with the entity’s articles of organization or incorporation under Tennessee law to form the complete governance framework.
Key Provisions and Processes to Include in Governance Documents
Certain provisions commonly appear in well drafted operating agreements and bylaws because they address recurring risks and operational needs. Important elements include ownership percentages, capital contribution requirements, allocation of profits and losses, voting thresholds for major decisions, procedures for admitting or removing owners, transfer restrictions, and dispute resolution methods. Other practical processes cover meeting notice requirements, records retention, and successor planning. Including clear procedures helps reduce misunderstandings and gives the business a predictable path for handling changes, disputes, and growth, which benefits owners and stakeholders alike.
Glossary of Key Terms for Operating Agreements and Bylaws
This glossary defines terms commonly used in governance documents so owners can better understand their rights and obligations. Knowing the meaning of terms such as majority vote, fiduciary duties, capital contribution, membership interest, quorum, and transfer restrictions helps business people make informed decisions when negotiating and reviewing documents. The following entries explain these concepts in plain language, offering context on how they affect daily management and longer term planning. A clear understanding of terminology reduces confusion during drafting and ensures that the final documents reflect the true intentions of the owners.
Capital Contribution
Capital contribution refers to the funds, property, or services that an owner provides to the business in exchange for an ownership interest. These contributions can be made at formation or through later capital calls, and the operating agreement should specify whether contributions are required and what happens if an owner fails to contribute. Clear rules protect the companys financial stability and make it easier to calculate ownership percentages and distribution rights. Properly drafted provisions also address whether additional contributions earn interest, whether they change ownership shares, and how noncash contributions are valued.
Transfer Restrictions
Transfer restrictions limit an owner’s ability to sell or assign their ownership interest without complying with specific procedures. Common mechanisms include rights of first refusal, buy sell provisions, and approval requirements by other owners or the board. These clauses help maintain control over who can enter the ownership group and prevent unintended third parties from acquiring interests. They also set out valuation methods and timelines for buyouts. Clear transfer provisions reduce uncertainty during ownership changes and help the company preserve continuity and agreed upon operating dynamics.
Fiduciary Duties and Manager Responsibilities
Fiduciary duties describe the obligations managers or directors owe to the company and its owners, often including duties of loyalty and care. Operating agreements and bylaws can clarify the scope of those duties, establish standards for decision making, and outline conflict of interest procedures. When duties are defined in writing, decision makers have a clearer framework for handling transactions that might benefit them personally. Well written provisions balance owner protection with the flexibility needed to run the business efficiently, while also describing processes for approving related party deals and disclosing potential conflicts.
Buy-Sell Provisions
Buy sell provisions govern how ownership interests are transferred or purchased upon triggering events such as death, disability, retirement, or disputes. These clauses typically outline valuation methods, payment terms, and timelines for completing transfers, which reduces uncertainty and conflict when transitions occur. By specifying how departures are handled, buy sell provisions help preserve business continuity and protect both remaining owners and departing parties. They can also set out options for staged payments, lump sum purchases, or arrangements based on independent valuation, providing flexibility to suit the companys financial realities.
Comparing Limited Templates to Fully Tailored Governance Documents
Business owners often weigh the cost and convenience of template documents against the benefits of tailored drafting. Templates may offer a low cost starting point, but they can leave gaps or use generic language that does not match the owners’ intentions or local legal nuances. Tailored governance documents are crafted to reflect ownership structure, industry practices, and foreseeable contingencies, reducing ambiguity and dispute risk. This comparison highlights trade offs in cost, precision, and long term protection, helping owners choose the right approach based on company size, complexity, and future plans.
When a Template or Limited Approach May Be Appropriate:
Low Complexity and Limited Ownership Changes
A limited approach can be appropriate for very small businesses with a single owner or with owners who have a long standing working relationship and little expectation of ownership changes. In such cases, a straightforward operating agreement template can confirm basic governance rules, distribution methods, and management roles without incurring significant drafting costs. However, even in these situations it is wise to ensure the template aligns with Tennessee law and briefly addresses transfer restrictions and dispute resolution so that the business has a baseline set of expectations if circumstances change in the future.
When Immediate Cost Constraints Are a Primary Concern
Some founders prioritize getting a business operating quickly on a tight budget, and a basic governance template can bridge the initial period while the company establishes revenue and stability. A limited approach can cover essential governance items and allow owners to revisit and expand the documents later when finances permit. The key is to understand the template’s limitations and to set a plan for revisiting the agreement. Leaving major contingencies unaddressed indefinitely increases risk, so a measured plan to upgrade governance documents as the business develops is recommended.
Why a Comprehensive Drafting Process Often Provides Greater Protection:
Complex Ownership Structures and Outside Investors
When a company has multiple owners, outside investors, or differing classes of membership or shares, a comprehensive drafting process becomes important to align incentives and reduce conflict. Tailored agreements address different voting rights, preferred return structures, investor protections, and vesting or dilution mechanisms. Without carefully structured terms, misunderstandings about control and distributions can lead to disputes that threaten the company’s stability. Drafting that considers investor relations, potential exit strategies, and governance consistency helps create a framework that supports growth and investor confidence.
Significant Asset or Succession Considerations
Companies holding substantial assets or those with planned succession events require governance documents that manage transfer risks and continuity. Comprehensive agreements can provide detailed buyout mechanisms, valuation procedures, and contingency plans for unexpected departures or deaths. These provisions help ensure that the business can continue operating while balancing the interests of remaining owners and departing parties. By addressing these matters in advance, owners create a predictable process that can reduce litigation risk and maintain the businesss operational stability through transitions.
Advantages of Investing in Thorough Governance Documents
A comprehensive governance approach offers measurable benefits such as reduced internal conflict, clearer decision making, and improved ability to attract financing or strategic partners. Well drafted documents show that the company has established business processes and governance standards, which can reassure lenders and investors. Additionally, precise language in operating agreements and bylaws reduces ambiguity about roles and expectations, helping managers and owners make consistent decisions. Over time, these benefits can preserve value, support growth plans, and make future transitions smoother and less costly.
In addition to preventing disputes, comprehensive documents enable faster operational responses because decision protocols are already in place. They outline who can enter into contracts, approve major expenditures, and hire or terminate key personnel, which reduces delays during critical moments. Clear dispute resolution mechanisms can also keep disagreements out of court by providing mediation or buyout pathways. Overall, the upfront investment in tailored governance materials often pays dividends through lower legal costs, greater business resilience, and better alignment among owners over the life of the company.
Greater Predictability in Owner Relations
Predictability in how owners interact and make decisions reduces the likelihood of disruptive conflicts that can divert attention from running the business. When agreements clearly spell out voting thresholds, meeting procedures, and dispute resolution methods, owners know what to expect when a contentious issue arises. This certainty supports smoother daily operations and helps maintain focus on growth and service delivery. Predictable governance also supports planning for long term investments and strategic initiatives, because owners can rely on established procedures rather than informal understandings that may change with personnel shifts.
Stronger Protection for Business Continuity
By including clear buyout provisions, succession plans, and transfer restrictions, comprehensive governance documents help preserve the business when ownership changes occur. These provisions facilitate orderly transitions, allowing the company to continue operations with minimal disruption. Clear rules about valuation and payment terms protect both remaining owners and those exiting, avoiding protracted disputes. Business continuity protections also support employee confidence and client relationships by demonstrating that the company has anticipated and planned for foreseeable changes, reducing uncertainty among stakeholders.

Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Etowah operating agreement lawyer
- McMinn County bylaws attorney
- Tennessee LLC operating agreement drafting
- corporate bylaws Tennessee
- business governance documents Etowah
- buy sell agreement Tennessee
- business succession planning Etowah
- ownership transfer restrictions Tennessee
- corporate governance counsel McMinn County
Practical Tips for Drafting Effective Governance Documents
Start with Clear Ownership and Management Definitions
Begin by defining ownership interests, management roles, and voting procedures in plain language that all owners can understand. Clearly described ownership percentages and decision rights reduce ambiguity during routine operations and in times of dispute. Include provisions that specify how meetings are called, what constitutes a quorum, and what voting thresholds apply to different types of decisions. Providing these definitions early in the document helps the rest of the agreement reference consistent terms and makes the governance framework easier to follow for owners, managers, and third parties such as banks or investors.
Plan for Common Trigger Events
Keep the Language Practical and Flexible
Draft governance clauses in straightforward language that reflects how the business actually operates, while allowing enough flexibility for reasonable changes over time. Avoid overly rigid rules that create administrative burdens or prevent managers from responding quickly to opportunities. At the same time, include mechanisms for amendment and review so that the document can evolve as the company grows. Practical, balanced drafting reduces the need for frequent revisions and helps ensure that the governance framework remains a useful tool rather than a constraint on the businesss ability to adapt.
When to Consider Updating or Creating Governance Documents
Consider drafting or updating operating agreements and bylaws when ownership changes, the company seeks outside investment, or when growth creates new management needs. Other triggers include adding managers or directors, planning for succession, or encountering disputes that reveal gaps in existing documents. Updating governance materials at these times ensures that the documents reflect the current ownership structure, funding arrangements, and operational realities. Regular review also keeps the company aligned with changes in Tennessee law and industry practice, improving legal clarity and business efficiency.
It is also wise to revisit governance documents following a major transaction, such as a merger, acquisition, or significant financing event, because these activities can change ownership percentages and governance expectations. Even small companies benefit from periodic reviews to confirm that distribution rules, capital contribution obligations, and conflict resolution procedures remain appropriate. Updating documents proactively reduces the risk of costly disagreements, preserves business value, and provides a clear playbook for both day to day management and exceptional circumstances requiring owner collaboration.
Typical Situations Where Governance Documents Are Needed
Common circumstances include forming a new company with multiple owners, admitting a new investor, planning owner succession, resolving owner disputes, or preparing for a sale. Each situation requires tailored provisions to protect parties’ interests and ensure continuity. For example, admitting investors often requires preferred return structures and protective covenants, while succession planning needs buyout and valuation mechanisms. Identifying the company’s likely scenarios helps prioritize which provisions to include and ensures the governance documents are both practical and protective for the foreseeable future.
Formation with Multiple Owners
When a business is formed by more than one person, drafting an operating agreement or bylaws from the outset helps set expectations about management and profit sharing. Early clarity about roles and responsibilities prevents misunderstandings as the company begins operations. The document should cover contributions, initial ownership percentages, decision making authority, and dispute resolution. Including these provisions at formation saves time and cost later, and provides a foundation for future growth by establishing how decisions will be made and how ownership transitions will be handled.
Admitting Investors or New Members
Bringing in outside investors or admitting new members requires careful drafting to address different classes of interest, investor protections, and dilution. Governance documents should specify rights, preferred distributions, voting thresholds, and restrictions on transfers. Clear terms help align investor expectations with those of existing owners and set a transparent framework for future financing. Properly structured provisions also protect the companys decision making process by defining approval requirements for major transactions and ensuring that the introduction of new capital supports long term goals.
Succession and Exit Planning
Planning for owner departures or exits is essential to prevent disruption when transitions occur. Succession provisions and buy sell clauses describe valuation methods, timing, and payment terms, providing a roadmap for orderly transfers. This planning protects the business’s ongoing operations and preserves value for remaining owners. Including these terms in governance documents ensures that everyone understands the process for transfer, whether voluntary or involuntary, and reduces the potential for disputes by setting expectations ahead of time.
Local Assistance for Operating Agreements and Bylaws in Etowah
Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to advise businesses in Etowah, McMinn County, and throughout Tennessee on creating and updating operating agreements and corporate bylaws. We focus on producing documents that are grounded in the realities of the local business community, while ensuring compliance with state requirements. Our goal is to provide clear guidance and practical solutions that let owners focus on running their business, knowing that their governance documents support stable management, fair distributions, and a prepared path for future transitions and new investments.
Why Local Business Owners Choose Our Firm for Governance Drafting
Local businesses work with our firm because we emphasize clear communication and practical drafting that reflects the company’s goals. We take time to understand the owners’ priorities and structure documents that address potential disputes and operational needs. Our drafting process prioritizes plain language and usable procedures so that the documents guide real decisions rather than creating unnecessary complexity. Clients appreciate a hands on approach that aligns governance with business strategy and anticipates common issues before they arise.
We also focus on creating documents that integrate with financing and transaction needs, helping companies present coherent governance to banks, investors, and prospective buyers. This cohesion supports smoother financing processes and clearer due diligence. By addressing the needs of third parties along with owner protections, the documents serve multiple purposes: managing internal relations and supporting external credibility. The result is governance that helps the business operate confidently while demonstrating sound management to stakeholders.
Finally, our firm provides ongoing support for governance matters, including amendments, interpretation questions, and assistance during ownership transitions. Having a consistent legal partner for governance matters reduces the time and stress associated with changes and disputes. Whether creating an initial agreement or revising existing bylaws, we help owners implement practical solutions that fit the companys stage and objectives, while ensuring the documents remain aligned with Tennessee law and business best practices.
Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Discuss Your Operating Agreement Needs
How We Draft and Implement Governance Documents
Our process begins with an intake meeting to understand your business, ownership structure, and priorities. We then review any existing documents and identify gaps or conflicts that require attention. Following that, we draft proposed provisions and walk through them with the owners to ensure the language reflects their intentions. Once finalized, we provide execution guidance and recommended record keeping practices. This collaborative approach yields governance documents that are practical, enforceable, and aligned with the company’s operational needs and long term plans.
Step One: Initial Assessment and Information Gathering
The first step focuses on collecting foundational information about the business, including ownership percentages, capital contributions, existing agreements, and anticipated future changes. During this assessment we identify priority provisions based on the company’s situation and long term goals. Understanding the business’s commercial context allows us to draft targeted clauses that address likely challenges. This stage sets the tone for drafting by establishing what must be included now and what can be reserved for future amendment as the company evolves and new needs arise.
Ownership and Financial Structure Review
We review how ownership is currently recorded and how financial contributions and distributions have been handled to date. This helps confirm ownership percentages and flag any informal arrangements that should be captured in writing. Accurate documentation of financial structure is essential to prevent misunderstandings about capital accounts, profit allocation, and future contribution obligations. Clarifying these points at the start makes subsequent drafting more accurate and reduces the need for corrective amendments later.
Identify Critical Business and Transactional Needs
During the intake we also discuss upcoming transactions, potential investor interest, succession plans, and other events that could affect governance. Identifying these needs early ensures that the drafted documents cover foreseeable contingencies such as buyouts, investor protections, or transfer restrictions. Aligning the governance structure with anticipated business actions reduces surprises and positions the company for smoother execution when those events occur. We then prioritize drafting items to match the company’s immediate and strategic objectives.
Step Two: Drafting Proposed Governance Language
In this stage we draft tailored provisions that reflect the owners’ priorities, legal requirements, and practical management considerations. Drafting focuses on clarity, consistency of defined terms, and realistic procedures for decision making and transfers. We avoid overly complex clauses and instead aim for language that owners and managers can use in practice. After an initial draft is prepared, we review it with the owners, gather feedback, and revise the document to resolve any ambiguities or unintended consequences before finalizing the text.
Iterative Review and Owner Feedback
We present the draft to owners and discuss how each provision functions in real situations, inviting feedback and clarifying intent. This iterative review helps catch issues that only become apparent when parties consider practical application. Revisions after this collaborative review ensure the final document reflects both legal soundness and operational practicality. The goal is a document that all parties understand, accept, and can follow, minimizing friction when the provisions are implemented in actual business decisions.
Addressing Third Party and Compliance Needs
We also consider the needs of lenders, investors, and regulators, incorporating provisions that facilitate financing, investment, or regulatory compliance where appropriate. Clear governance can smooth due diligence and make financing negotiations more efficient. If a transaction is imminent, we include clauses that support the anticipated structure and investor rights. This proactive drafting reduces the need for costly amendments during critical financing or sale processes and ensures the company meets external requirements while protecting owner interests.
Step Three: Finalization, Execution, and Implementation
After drafting and review, we finalize the documents and assist with proper execution and record keeping. This stage includes preparing signature pages, advising on required corporate formalities, and recommending internal controls for document maintenance. We also provide guidance on how to implement new procedures such as notice protocols and meeting practices. Proper execution and routine adherence to the documents strengthen their enforceability and ensure the governance framework functions as intended over time.
Execution and Record Keeping
We advise on the formalities needed to adopt and maintain the governance documents, including signing requirements, meeting minutes, and filing suggestions where applicable. Proper record keeping demonstrates that the business observes its own rules and supports the company’s legal standing. Clear documentation of adoption and subsequent amendments helps preserve continuity and provides useful evidence if questions arise. We outline practical procedures owners can follow to keep governance current and accessible.
Ongoing Support and Amendments
Following implementation we remain available to address questions, draft amendments, or assist with transactions that require updated governance terms. Businesses change over time, and governance documents should be revisited to reflect new ownership structures or strategic shifts. Ongoing support helps clients adapt their documents without disrupting operations and ensures amendments are drafted to maintain clarity and legal effectiveness. This continuity gives owners confidence that their governing documents will continue to serve the business as it grows.
Frequently Asked Questions About Operating Agreements and Bylaws
What is the difference between an operating agreement and corporate bylaws?
An operating agreement is typically used by limited liability companies to define management structure, member rights, profit allocations, and operational procedures. Corporate bylaws serve a similar role for corporations by setting out director and officer duties, meeting protocols, and shareholder procedures. Both documents fill in the governance details that statutory formation documents do not cover, and they can be customized to reflect the owners’ intentions and practical needs. The choice between them depends on the business entity type and the governance issues that owners want to address. Clear distinction and proper drafting help ensure that the company’s internal rules match its legal form and operational realities.
When should a business adopt an operating agreement or bylaws?
Governance documents should be adopted at formation for businesses with more than one owner or any entity that plans to take on investors, hire managers, or hold significant assets. Early adoption prevents ambiguity and establishes agreed upon procedures from the start, reducing the chance of conflict as the business begins operations. It is also appropriate to adopt or revise these documents when ownership changes occur, when outside financing is sought, or before major transactions. Regularly reviewing and updating the documents as the business evolves keeps the governance aligned with current circumstances and strategic goals.
Can an operating agreement or bylaws prevent disputes between owners?
While these documents cannot eliminate all disputes, they significantly reduce the likelihood and severity of conflicts by setting out clear procedures for decision making, transfers, and dispute resolution. When rules are explicit, owners and managers have a roadmap to resolve disagreements through agreed processes such as buyouts or mediation. The drafting should anticipate likely areas of contention and provide mechanisms to resolve those issues. By clarifying expectations, governance documents decrease uncertainty and help parties reach solutions without resorting to litigation, preserving value and relationships.
How are ownership transfers and buyouts handled in these documents?
Governance documents commonly include transfer restrictions and buyout provisions that outline how ownership interests may be sold or otherwise transferred. These clauses often specify approval requirements, rights of first refusal, and valuation methods for determining buyout prices. They also set timelines and payment terms to ensure orderly transitions. Clear buyout mechanisms protect both departing owners and those who remain by providing a predictable process for transfers, which supports business continuity and reduces the risk of disputes arising from unplanned ownership changes.
Do governance documents need to be filed with the state?
In many cases operating agreements and corporate bylaws do not need to be filed with the state to be effective, although the entity’s articles of organization or incorporation must be filed. However, keeping these documents with the company records and following required formalities is important for enforcement and for preserving liability protections. Some transactions or lenders may ask to review governance documents, so maintaining up to date copies is practical. Proper execution and record keeping demonstrate that the company adheres to its own rules and maintains good internal governance practices.
How often should governing documents be reviewed or updated?
Governing documents should be reviewed whenever there are material changes to ownership, capital structure, or business operations, and on a periodic basis to ensure continued relevance. Regular reviews help identify necessary amendments prompted by growth, new investments, regulatory changes, or strategic shifts. Establishing a plan to revisit the documents at predictable intervals or upon certain triggers reduces the risk that outdated provisions cause problems later. Ongoing attention to governance keeps the company aligned with evolving needs and legal standards.
What happens if a business has no operating agreement or bylaws?
If a business lacks written governance documents, decision making can default to statutory rules or informal practices that may be ambiguous and lead to disputes. Without clear agreements, owners may disagree about distributions, management authority, or transfer rights, increasing the risk of litigation or operational disruption. Adopting written operating agreements or bylaws provides clarity, documents expectations, and creates predictable procedures for resolving issues. For the protection and smooth operation of the business, adopting governance documents is a prudent step for multi owner companies.
Can governance documents be amended after they are adopted?
Yes, governance documents can be amended if the procedure for amendment is followed, which is usually described within the documents themselves. Amendments commonly require specific voting thresholds or written consent from a defined percentage of owners or shareholders. It is important to document amendments clearly, update records, and follow any formalities required by the document and state law. Properly executed amendments ensure that changes reflect the current intentions of the owners and remain enforceable over time.
Should governance documents address dispute resolution?
Including dispute resolution provisions such as negotiation, mediation, or buyout procedures can help owners resolve disagreements efficiently and privately. These mechanisms often reduce the cost and time associated with court litigation and preserve working relationships. Tailoring dispute resolution to the company’s culture and resources provides predictable ways to address conflicts and can be a strong deterrent to protracted disputes. Clear resolution pathways give owners confidence that disagreements can be managed constructively without undue disruption to the business.
How do governance documents affect relationships with banks and investors?
Banks, lenders, and investors commonly review governance documents to assess management structure and decision making authority before providing financing or capital. Clear bylaws or operating agreements that define who can execute loans, pledge assets, or authorize major transactions streamline due diligence and reassure third parties about the company’s internal controls. Having professionally drafted governance materials can thus facilitate financing and strategic partnerships by showing that the company has established processes for oversight and approval of significant business activities.