Contract Drafting and Review Attorney in Greenback, Tennessee

Essential Guide to Contract Drafting and Review for Greenback Businesses

When a business in Greenback needs clear, enforceable contracts, careful drafting and thoughtful review make the difference between smooth operations and costly disputes. This page explains the core steps involved in creating, reviewing, and refining contracts that protect business interests while keeping relationships intact. Whether you are negotiating supplier agreements, service contracts, partnership terms, or client engagements, a proactive approach reduces ambiguity and limits future conflicts. Our firm works with local companies to anticipate common pitfalls and to tailor contract language that reflects each party’s intentions and reduces the likelihood of expensive misunderstandings.

Contract drafting and review is more than swapping clauses in a template. It requires attention to the business goals behind each agreement and the practical implications of the language used. For Greenback businesses, that means accounting for Tennessee law, local court practices, and the operational realities of smaller companies. A careful review evaluates risk allocation, remedies, termination rights, payment and delivery terms, confidentiality, and dispute resolution. Thoughtful drafting also streamlines future enforcement and makes compliance easier for both parties, saving time and money long term while supporting predictable business relationships.

Why Thorough Contract Drafting and Review Matters for Your Business

Well-drafted contracts provide clarity, reduce disputes, and establish reliable expectations between parties. For businesses in Greenback, clear agreements protect revenue, define responsibilities, and set procedures for change or termination. A careful review highlights ambiguous terms, unusually one-sided provisions, and potential enforcement problems that can become disruptive later. In addition to legal protection, strong contracts can improve operational efficiency by clarifying timelines, payment procedures, and performance standards. This proactive approach helps preserve business relationships while protecting your company’s financial and reputational interests.

About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Business Contracts

Jay Johnson Law Firm serves Greenback and surrounding communities from Hendersonville and across Tennessee. Our lawyers focus on practical, results-oriented contract work for small and mid-sized businesses, combining knowledge of local business practices with thorough legal review. We emphasize clear communication, prompt turnaround, and drafting that aligns with each client’s commercial goals. Our approach includes listening to business needs, identifying areas of risk, and providing revisions and recommendations that are easy to implement. We also assist with negotiation strategies that protect clients while maintaining productive business relationships.

Contract drafting begins with a careful assessment of what the parties intend to accomplish and the risks they are willing to accept. Drafting involves selecting language that accurately reflects negotiated terms while anticipating areas of potential disagreement. Review focuses on detecting ambiguous language, missing provisions, and clauses that could lead to unintended liability. Good contract work considers governing law, remedies, notice procedures, limitation of liability, and clear definitions to reduce interpretive disputes. For businesses, this means contracts that are practical to enforce and aligned with daily operations.

A comprehensive review also evaluates the commercial implications of standard clauses like indemnity, noncompete provisions, warranties, and limitation of damages. It assesses whether the allocation of risk is appropriate for the transaction and whether the contract’s structure supports long-term business objectives. For Greenback companies, local law and industry norms are considered to ensure the agreement will function as intended in practice. The service can include drafting new contracts from scratch, revising templates, or providing redlines and explanations to help business owners make informed decisions during negotiations.

What Contract Drafting and Review Includes

Contract drafting creates written agreements that capture the negotiated terms and outline each party’s obligations, rights, and remedies. Review is an analytical process that inspects existing drafts for clarity, consistency, and potential legal or commercial problems. Both tasks incorporate plain-language adjustments where appropriate, clear definitions, and structured sections for performance, payment, confidentiality, and dispute resolution. The goal is to produce documents that reduce the need for litigation, support enforceability, and provide predictable results, while aligning with the business purposes behind the deal.

Key Elements and the Typical Contract Review Process

A typical contract review examines definitions, scope of services or goods, payment terms, delivery and deadlines, warranties, liability limitations, termination rights, and dispute resolution. The process starts with reading the entire agreement to gauge overall balance and then drilling down into each clause for clarity and legal consequence. Recommended revisions are provided with rationale and suggested alternative language. The review also considers attachments, exhibits, and referenced documents to ensure consistency. The end product is a redlined draft and a plain-English summary of issues and options for the business client.

Key Contract Terms and a Short Glossary for Business Owners

Understanding contract terminology helps business owners recognize risk and communicate effectively during negotiations. This glossary highlights commonly encountered terms such as indemnity, force majeure, warranties, and limitation of liability, and explains their practical impact on performance and liability. A clear understanding of these terms enables business leaders in Greenback to ask the right questions and make choices that support their commercial goals. The following entries provide concise definitions and examples relevant to everyday business agreements.

Indemnity

An indemnity clause shifts financial responsibility for specified losses from one party to another, often covering claims, damages, or legal fees arising from third-party actions or breaches. In practice, these clauses can be narrow or broad, and the exact scope determines when a business must compensate the other party. Careful drafting clarifies triggers, the types of claims covered, and any caps or exclusions. Businesses should evaluate whether an indemnity is reciprocal, limited to negligence, or extends to more expansive liabilities, and adjust language to match commercial bargaining positions.

Limitation of Liability

A limitation of liability provision restricts the types or amounts of damages a party may recover for breaches or other claims under the contract. This can include caps on monetary recovery, exclusions of certain categories of damages, or mutual limits to balance risk. These clauses can make agreements more predictable by defining maximum exposure, but they must be drafted carefully to avoid leaving a party without meaningful remedies. Parties should negotiate limits that reflect the nature of the transaction and the relative bargaining power of each side.

Force Majeure

A force majeure clause excuses performance when unexpected events beyond a party’s control make fulfillment impossible or impractical, such as natural disasters or governmental actions. Effective clauses define qualifying events, notice requirements, and the consequences for affected obligations. Clear drafting avoids disputes about whether an event qualifies and how parties should mitigate harm. Businesses should ensure that applicable events are listed and that procedures for suspension, extension, or termination are specified so both parties know how to respond when disruptions occur.

Termination and Remedies

Termination provisions explain when and how a contract can end, including for breach, convenience, or failure to meet conditions. Remedies clauses describe the available responses to breach, such as specific performance, damages, or rights to cure or suspend services. Clear termination and remedy language reduces surprises and provides predictable paths for resolving failures to perform. It is important to coordinate these clauses with notice procedures, cure periods, and any post-termination obligations like return of materials or final accounting.

Comparing Limited Review and Comprehensive Contract Services

Businesses often choose between a limited, targeted review and a comprehensive drafting or review package. A limited review focuses on a few key clauses or a single agreement to address immediate concerns quickly. A comprehensive service evaluates entire contract libraries, drafts bespoke agreements, and aligns templates with company policy. Each approach has trade-offs in cost, time, and depth. Smaller transactions or routine renewals may merit a targeted review, while significant deals or recurring contract needs benefit from a full drafting and alignment process that reduces long-term risk.

When a Targeted Review Is Appropriate:

Routine or Low-Risk Transactions

A limited review is often sensible for routine, low-value transactions where the commercial terms are straightforward and the exposure is minimal. In these situations, focusing on payment terms, delivery, and basic liability provisions can prevent common issues without incurring the time and cost of a comprehensive overhaul. The goal is to confirm that core protections are in place and that nothing material is missing. This approach helps businesses maintain transactional efficiency while addressing the most likely pain points.

Isolated or One-Time Agreements

When an agreement is a one-off arrangement with limited long-term impact, a narrow review targeted at the most important commercial terms may be appropriate. The lawyer reviews contractual risk allocation, termination rights, and payment protection, offering suggested edits to reduce clear pitfalls. This saves resources while providing protection where it matters most. Businesses should still ensure the review addresses any clauses that could create ongoing obligations or expose them to unexpected liabilities beyond the scope of the one-time transaction.

Why a Comprehensive Contract Approach Often Pays Off:

Recurring or High-Value Contracts

For companies that enter into recurring agreements or handle high-value transactions, a comprehensive approach ensures consistency across all documents and reduces cumulative risk. Standardized, well-drafted templates save time during negotiation, reduce the chance of inconsistent obligations, and provide predictable remedies across contracts. Investing in a full review and template creation can prevent repeated drafting errors and create a stable contractual framework that supports growth, vendor relationships, and long-term business planning.

Complex Transactions or Strategic Partnerships

Complex deals, strategic partnerships, or transactions involving intellectual property or regulatory considerations require a complete drafting and alignment process. Comprehensive services evaluate interdependencies, ensure protective provisions are in place, and coordinate ancillary documents such as schedules, statements of work, and confidentiality agreements. This comprehensive attention minimizes gaps that could surface later and provides a clear record of negotiated terms, which is especially valuable when multiple stakeholders or cross-jurisdictional elements are involved.

Benefits of a Comprehensive Contracting Strategy

A comprehensive contracting strategy provides uniformity, reduces ambiguity, and supports scalable business operations. By creating consistent templates and reviewing existing agreements for alignment, businesses lower the risk of conflicting terms and reduce the administrative burden of negotiating each contract from scratch. The result is greater predictability in outcomes, clearer internal processes for approvals and sign-offs, and fewer disputes. Companies that standardize agreements often see improvements in cash flow and vendor management because expectations and remedies are already spelled out.

Comprehensive review and drafting also enable better risk management through deliberate allocation of responsibilities and liability. It allows business leaders to make informed decisions about which risks to retain and which to transfer. Clear, well-organized contracts facilitate internal compliance and simplify onboarding of new staff or partners. Over time, this approach saves legal fees by preventing repetitive negotiations and reducing the frequency of adverse events that require costly dispute resolution.

Consistency and Efficiency Across Agreements

Standardized contracts reduce negotiation time by providing a predictable baseline that both parties can work from, and they permit organizations to implement internal review processes more effectively. With consistent clauses across vendor, customer, and partner contracts, staff can more quickly recognize deviations and enforce company policy. This streamlining helps teams focus on strategic business activities rather than repetitive contract disputes, and it improves operational reliability because obligations and timelines are presented in the same format across documents.

Better Risk Management and Predictable Remedies

A thorough contract program gives businesses greater control over risk allocation and remedies by ensuring that limitation of liability, indemnity, and termination provisions are consistent and appropriate. When disputes arise, clear remedies and notice procedures reduce uncertainty and often lead to faster, less adversarial resolution. For Greenback businesses operating under Tennessee law, this predictability is valuable for budgeting and planning because it defines the likely consequences of breach and limits exposure to open-ended claims.

Jay Johnson Law firm Logo

Top Searched Keywords

Practical Tips for Better Contracts

Be Clear About Deliverables and Deadlines

Clearly define deliverables, milestones, and deadlines to avoid disputes over performance expectations. Vague terms like reasonable efforts can lead to differing interpretations that slow projects and create friction. Instead, specify measurable criteria, acceptance procedures, and remedies for missed deadlines. Also include procedures for approved changes or extensions so teams know how to handle adjustments without undermining the main agreement. These practical drafting choices reduce uncertainty, keep projects on track, and protect revenue and reputation.

Limit Ambiguous Legal Terms and Define Key Words

Ambiguous terms invite disagreement. Use a definitions section for recurring concepts and define critical terms such as services, deliverables, and business day. Avoid blanketing phrases that are open to interpretation and instead use objective measures when possible. Clear definitions improve enforceability and reduce negotiation time. When custom or industry terms are necessary, include a definition to ensure both parties share the same understanding. This simple drafting discipline reduces conflicts and helps enforce the contract as intended.

Align Contract Language With Business Processes

Ensure that contract obligations align with how your business actually operates, including invoicing cycles, delivery lead times, and approval workflows. Contracts that require impossible performance or that conflict with internal procedures create compliance problems and undercut relationships. Discuss practical implementation with internal teams before finalizing language, and include realistic notice and cure periods. Practical alignment reduces accidental breaches and supports smoother relationships with clients and vendors, preserving revenue and operational stability.

Reasons Greenback Businesses Should Consider Professional Contract Support

Professional contract support helps businesses avoid avoidable disputes, protects revenue streams, and promotes consistent operational expectations. With tailored drafting and review, companies in Greenback can reduce ambiguity that often leads to missed deadlines, disputed payments, or conflicting obligations. Legal review also identifies clauses that could impose hidden costs, such as indemnity or unfavorable automatic renewal terms. Engaging in this work proactively translates into clearer relationships and fewer interruptions to daily operations, preserving both financial resources and time.

Additionally, professional support creates a foundation for growth by standardizing agreements and streamlining negotiation. Businesses ready to scale benefit from templates that reflect company policy and acceptable risk levels. Whether dealing with vendors, customers, or strategic partners, consistent contracts establish clear expectations and simplify onboarding. This preparation reduces the burden on leadership during rapid growth periods and helps maintain quality and compliance across transactions as the company expands within Tennessee and beyond.

Common Situations When Contract Review or Drafting Is Most Valuable

Contract services are especially valuable when entering new vendor relationships, hiring contractors, launching product or service offerings, forming partnerships, or renewing major agreements. They are also important before signing leases, financing documents, or distribution contracts where long-term obligations can affect cash flow and business flexibility. A review is recommended whenever a template from another party is presented, or when standard language appears unusually one-sided. Early attention helps avoid costly renegotiations and reduces operational disruption.

New Vendor or Supplier Agreements

When onboarding a new vendor or supplier, the contract should clearly state delivery expectations, quality standards, payment terms, and remedies for failure to perform. Reviewing these agreements can prevent supply chain interruptions and define each party’s responsibilities in the event of delays or defects. Reasonable notice and cure periods, acceptance testing procedures, and clear dispute resolution language protect the buyer while keeping the relationship operational and productive. Investing time in review at the outset often prevents downstream problems.

Service Contracts and Client Agreements

Service contracts require precise descriptions of scope, performance metrics, invoicing, and intellectual property ownership if deliverables include custom work. A careful review clarifies what is included and what is not, reducing scope creep and minimizing payment disputes. Contracts should address timelines, client responsibilities, warranty terms, and termination rights. Clear processes for change orders help manage expectations and protect revenue. For businesses providing services, well-drafted agreements are a key part of maintaining professionalism and predictable cash flow.

Partnership and Collaboration Agreements

Partnerships and collaborations often involve shared resources, profit or loss allocation, and joint decision-making. Contracts should define governance, contributions, ownership interests, exits, and dispute procedures. Reviewing these agreements before signing helps ensure that obligations and remedies are proportionate to the benefits received. Clear buyout mechanisms and decision-making processes reduce the likelihood of conflicts that can hinder operations or damage relationships. Addressing these matters in writing protects all participants and preserves business continuity.

Jay Johnson

Local Contract Law Services for Greenback Businesses

Jay Johnson Law Firm provides practical contract drafting and review services for businesses in Greenback and Loudon County. We focus on creating agreements that reflect local law and the practical needs of growing companies. Our approach is client-centered, with straightforward explanations and actionable recommendations designed to support business goals. Whether you need a quick review of a single contract or a comprehensive drafting program, we help you understand options and choose language that balances protection with commercial flexibility so transactions move forward smoothly.

Why Greenback Businesses Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Contracts

Clients choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for clear, business-minded contract support that focuses on practical results. Our service model emphasizes timely communication, concise redlines, and actionable summaries so decision-makers can proceed confidently. We tailor language to the business context, aiming to reduce disputes and support predictable outcomes. By aligning contract terms with operational realities, we make agreements easier to follow and enforce, which in turn reduces administrative friction and supports long-term business relationships.

We prioritize responsiveness and plain-language explanations that make legal choices understandable for owners and managers. Our reviews identify high-impact issues first, then address secondary concerns to produce a clear path forward. Whether negotiating contract terms or building templates for repeated use, our goal is to make legal work integrate seamlessly with day-to-day operations. This practical orientation helps businesses stay focused on growth while maintaining the protections needed to preserve value and limit avoidable disputes.

From initial review to negotiation support and final drafting, our services are designed for accessibility and usefulness. We provide redlined drafts and concise memos that explain options and trade-offs, enabling informed business decisions. We also assist with implementation steps like notice letters, contract rollouts, and internal training on new contract processes. For Greenback businesses, this comprehensive support helps create reliable contracting systems that save time, reduce legal surprises, and support sustainable operations.

Ready to Protect Your Business with Clear Contracts? Call Jay Johnson Law Firm

How Our Contract Drafting and Review Process Works

Our process begins with a focused intake to understand the commercial objectives and the documents at issue. We gather key information about parties, timelines, and desired outcomes, then conduct a thorough review or draft custom language. Recommendations are presented as redlines with plain-language explanations and prioritized issues. If negotiation is required, we provide strategy and proposed responses. After finalization, we offer assistance with implementation and periodic template reviews to ensure contracts remain aligned with evolving business needs and regulatory changes.

Step One: Initial Assessment and Intake

The initial assessment identifies transaction goals, potential risks, and important commercial terms. We collect relevant documents, confirm deadlines, and discuss any prior negotiations or templates. This early conversation focuses on what matters most to the business, enabling us to prioritize review points and propose practical revisions. The intake also clarifies decision-makers and approval workflows to ensure the redline and recommendations are provided in a format that supports efficient internal review and timely execution.

Collecting Documents and Key Information

We ask for current drafts, related exhibits, and any prior agreements that affect the negotiation. Gathering context such as project timelines, pricing structures, and performance standards helps us understand how the contract operates in practice. Identifying existing templates or company policies informs consistent drafting and reveals potential conflicts between documents. This preparation allows us to provide targeted guidance and to suggest changes that are compatible with existing business processes and operational constraints.

Clarifying Business Objectives and Priorities

During intake, we work with decision-makers to prioritize key business objectives, such as limiting liability, preserving cash flow, or protecting intellectual property. Clear priorities guide which clauses receive the most attention during drafting and review, and they help determine acceptable trade-offs. This alignment ensures that recommended language serves business aims while minimizing operational disruption. By understanding priorities early, we deliver focused revisions that address the most pressing risks and support the client’s commercial strategy.

Step Two: Detailed Review and Drafting

In the detailed review, we analyze each clause for clarity, consistency, and legal consequence. This includes reviewing definitions, performance obligations, payment mechanics, liability provisions, and termination rights. For drafting, we create language tailored to the transaction that reflects negotiated points and commercial priorities. We produce a redlined draft and an executive summary outlining major issues and suggested next steps. This stage ensures the agreement is balanced, implementable, and aligned with applicable law.

Clause-by-Clause Analysis

We examine each clause for unintended obligations, conflicting terms, and enforceability concerns. Attention is given to how sections interact, ensuring that definitions support operative provisions and that remedies, notice, and cure periods operate together logically. Where necessary, we propose alternative language designed to be commercially reasonable while protecting the client’s interests. The analysis identifies both immediate corrections and structural improvements that reduce future disputes and simplify enforcement.

Drafting Custom Language and Redlines

When drafting new provisions or revising existing text, we focus on precision and practical application. Our redlines aim to be concise and explain the purpose behind each change so nonlawyers can quickly evaluate the trade-offs. We recommend language that clarifies responsibilities, delineates remedies, and locks in agreed commercial terms. This drafting approach supports efficient negotiation and helps ensure that the final agreement reflects both the business deal and the operational realities of implementation.

Step Three: Negotiation Support and Finalization

After delivering redlines and recommendations, we support negotiations by proposing responses to counterpart comments and advising on acceptable concessions. Our goal is to reach an agreement that meets clients’ objectives while preserving important protections. Once terms are agreed, we finalize the document and assist with signature logistics and record retention. We can also provide follow-up guidance on implementation, including notices, schedules, or amendments, to ensure the agreement functions as intended in practice.

Negotiation Strategy and Counterproposal Preparation

We help craft negotiation responses that prioritize the client’s interests and maintain constructive dialogue with the counterparty. Strategies emphasize protecting key provisions while allowing compromise on lower-priority items to keep negotiations moving. Counterproposals are presented with explanations of their commercial impact so decision-makers can evaluate trade-offs quickly. Clear presentation of options helps achieve settlements that preserve business relationships and minimize the need for further legal intervention.

Finalizing Documents and Implementation Support

Once both parties accept the terms, we finalize the executed version and provide guidance on fulfilling post-signature obligations like notices, performance monitoring, and recordkeeping. We ensure that exhibits and attachments are complete and consistent with the main document. If changes are needed after execution, we assist with amendments and advise on the best process to implement modifications without creating unintended liabilities. This helps businesses stay compliant and maintain predictable operations after signing.

Frequently Asked Questions About Contract Drafting and Review

What does a contract review typically include?

A typical contract review covers clarity of obligations, risk allocation, enforcement mechanisms, and missing or inconsistent clauses that could create disputes. Reviewers check definitions, payment terms, delivery and performance requirements, termination and remedy provisions, and confidentiality or intellectual property allocations. The process also evaluates whether the contract reflects the parties’ actual intent and how easily it can be enforced under applicable law. A prioritized list of issues and suggested redline language is provided along with plain-language explanations so business owners can make informed decisions. The goal is to reduce ambiguity and to suggest practical revisions that protect the client’s interests without derailing the underlying commercial relationship.

The time required depends on the complexity and length of the agreement and whether custom drafting is needed. Simple, single-page agreements can often be reviewed within a few business days, while lengthy or multi-document transactions may take longer as we analyze interrelated terms and exhibits. When drafting new templates or negotiating complex deals, the process includes intake, revisions, and possibly multiple negotiation rounds. We aim to provide realistic timelines during the initial assessment and to prioritize issues so that urgent matters receive prompt attention while comprehensive work proceeds on an agreed schedule.

Cost varies based on the scope of work, the contract’s complexity, and whether the service is a limited review or a comprehensive drafting engagement. Some businesses prefer a limited review for individual agreements, which is often priced as a fixed fee or short hourly engagement. Comprehensive template creation, contract alignment across multiple documents, or negotiation support typically requires a broader engagement with a different fee structure. During the intake phase we provide a clear estimate and explain what is included so clients can choose an option that matches their budget and risk tolerance, while avoiding unexpected costs.

Yes, we can review contracts from other states or templates found online, but geographic differences in law and enforceability must be considered. Templates designed for other jurisdictions may contain provisions inconsistent with Tennessee law or local practices, so adjustments are usually necessary. A good review evaluates whether state-specific rules affect key clauses like limitation of liability, noncompete terms, or statutory remedies. We recommend tailoring any out-of-state template to reflect Tennessee law and your particular business context so the contract functions predictably for parties operating in Greenback and Loudon County.

Before a review begins, provide the current contract draft, any related attachments or exhibits, prior agreements between the parties, and a summary of the desired commercial terms. It is helpful to explain key priorities, deadlines, and any recent negotiations so the review can focus on high-impact items. Also share internal concerns such as cash flow constraints or operational limits that may affect acceptable terms. Having this context enables a targeted review that offers practical suggestions and redline language aligned with the business objectives and operational realities.

We offer negotiation support as part of our services, preparing counterproposals and advising on strategic concessions to protect business interests without stalling progress. Our role may include drafting responses, proposing compromise language, and explaining the commercial impact of concessions so clients can make informed decisions. If direct negotiation with a counterparty is desired, we can engage on the client’s behalf and handle communications to keep the process efficient and focused. Our approach emphasizes preserving business relationships while ensuring key protections are maintained.

Limiting liability typically involves clauses that cap damages, exclude certain categories of loss, or set monetary ceilings tied to contract value. Careful drafting balances protection with the need to preserve meaningful remedies; overly broad exclusions can be unenforceable or leave a party without practical recourse. Adding mutual limitations, carving out certain essential remedies, and tying caps to fees or insurance coverage are common ways to manage exposure. Each industry and transaction requires tailored approaches to ensure liability limits are reasonable and enforceable under applicable law.

Separate agreements are usually advisable for employees and independent contractors because legal classifications affect tax, benefits, and liability allocations. Contractor agreements should reflect the autonomy of the relationship, define deliverables and payment terms, and include appropriate intellectual property assignments and confidentiality provisions. Employee agreements often address employment policies, benefits, restrictive covenants where permissible, and termination rights. Using correct agreement types and clear language helps avoid disputes about classification and protects the business in regulatory and tax contexts.

Businesses should review templates periodically and whenever significant changes occur in operations, law, or business model. A routine review every one to three years helps catch outdated clauses, inconsistent language, and shifts in risk tolerance. Immediate review is recommended when new product lines are launched, when entering new markets, or following changes in applicable statutes or case law that affect core contract terms. Periodic updates preserve alignment with company policies and reduce the cumulative risk of relying on outdated contractual language.

Common red flags in vendor agreements include overly broad indemnities, unfavorable automatic renewal clauses, ambiguous payment or acceptance criteria, and missing termination or cure provisions. Other warning signs are inconsistent definitions, unlimited liability without mitigation, and obligations that cannot be performed operationally. Contracts that place unusual notice or confidentiality burdens without reciprocal protections can also pose problems. Identifying these issues during review allows businesses to negotiate clearer protections and to prevent hidden obligations that could harm operations or finances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can we help you?

Step 1 of 4

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

or call