Comprehensive Guide to Co-Ownership Agreements for Gruetli‑Laager Property Owners
Co-ownership of real property can offer flexibility and shared cost savings, but it also creates legal relationships that should be clearly defined. A well-drafted co-ownership agreement sets expectations for contributions, decision-making, use of the property, and procedures for resolving disputes or transferring ownership. Property owners in Gruetli‑Laager who share ownership with family, friends, or business partners benefit from documenting their rights and responsibilities to reduce misunderstandings later. This introduction explains the purpose of co-ownership agreements and why proactive planning helps preserve value and relationships among co-owners.
When multiple people own a home, land, or investment property together, informal arrangements may not protect everyone’s interests. A written agreement clarifies who pays for maintenance, how major repairs are approved, what happens if an owner wants to leave, and how rental income is distributed. For Gruetli‑Laager residents, local real estate practices and Tennessee property law influence how these provisions are drafted. This paragraph outlines common scenarios where a co-ownership agreement is especially helpful and explains how clear terms reduce the risk of costly disputes or unintended ownership outcomes.
Why a Co-Ownership Agreement Matters for Gruetli‑Laager Property Owners
A written co-ownership agreement protects each owner’s financial and decision-making interests and can prevent disagreements that threaten the property’s value. It provides a framework for day-to-day management, expense sharing, and long-term planning such as buyouts or sale procedures. Having these matters set out in advance helps streamline dealings with lenders, title companies, and potential buyers. For Gruetli‑Laager property owners, tailored provisions ensure compliance with Tennessee rules while reflecting local customs around property use, rental, and succession planning, reducing uncertainty when circumstances change.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Co-Ownership Matters
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves property owners across Tennessee with a focus on clear, practical legal solutions for real estate matters like co-ownership agreements. Our office in Hendersonville and outreach to communities such as Gruetli‑Laager emphasize client communication, careful document drafting, and realistic options for resolving disputes. We guide clients through negotiations, drafting, and review, and coordinate with other professionals when necessary to address title, tax, or estate planning implications. The approach centers on protecting client interests while preserving relationships among co-owners whenever possible.
Understanding Co-Ownership Agreements: Scope and Uses
A co-ownership agreement is a legal contract among owners describing rights and obligations related to jointly owned property. It covers contributions to purchase and upkeep, allocation of income and expenses, procedures for making repairs, rules on occupancy and use, dispute resolution processes, and terms for selling or transferring ownership. The agreement complements title documents like joint tenancy or tenancy in common and can override informal expectations among owners. For Gruetli‑Laager property owners, the agreement should address local property practices and Tennessee law to provide predictable outcomes and reduce friction between parties.
Co-ownership agreements are used in many situations, including family vacation homes, investment properties with multiple investors, or business partners holding title together. They can be short and focused or detailed to cover a wide range of contingencies such as death, bankruptcy, or prolonged incapacity of an owner. A clear agreement helps third parties like lenders and title companies understand ownership dynamics when mortgages, liens, or sales arise. Structured properly, these agreements protect each co-owner’s financial stake and provide defined paths for resolving conflicts without relying solely on court intervention.
Defining Co-Ownership Agreements and Their Legal Role
A co-ownership agreement is a contractual arrangement among property owners that supplements the legal title with customized rules governing use and management. While the deed identifies ownership shares, the agreement specifies everyday governance, financial obligations, and exit strategies. It is enforceable under general contract principles and tailored to work with Tennessee statutes affecting real property. By converting informal expectations into written obligations, co-ownership agreements reduce ambiguity, help avoid disputes, and create a documented process for decisions that can otherwise stall due to differing priorities among owners.
Essential Provisions and Typical Processes in Co-Ownership Agreements
Common provisions include ownership percentages, contribution schedules for mortgage and maintenance, allocation of rental income, rules for occupying the property, decision-making thresholds for repairs and improvements, dispute resolution clauses, and buyout or sale mechanics. The drafting process typically begins with an inventory of each owner’s goals and constraints, followed by negotiation of key terms and formalization into a written agreement. Attention to contingencies such as death, disability, or financial hardship helps ensure the agreement remains useful over time and reduces the likelihood of litigation.
Key Terms and Glossary for Co-Ownership Agreements
Understanding the terminology used in co-ownership agreements helps owners make informed choices. Terms such as ‘‘tenancy in common,’’ ‘‘right of first refusal,’’ ‘‘buy-sell provision,’’ and ‘‘operating budget’’ appear frequently and affect owners’ rights and obligations. A clear glossary within the agreement or accompanying materials reduces confusion when interpreting responsibilities or when communicating with lenders, accountants, or heirs. This section defines common terms and describes how they influence governance, transfers, and financial reporting for jointly held property in Tennessee.
Tenancy in Common
Tenancy in common is an ownership arrangement in which each owner holds an undivided interest in the property that can be transferred or inherited independently. Unlike joint tenancy with right of survivorship, tenancy in common allows co-owners to leave their share to heirs. A co-ownership agreement can specify how these individual shares are treated, including any limitations on transfers, buyout rights, or procedures to offer a departing owner’s share to remaining co-owners. Clear rules prevent unexpected title changes and help manage succession planning within Gruetli‑Laager properties.
Buy-Sell Provision
A buy-sell provision outlines the process by which one co-owner can sell their interest to the others or how the property will be sold outright if certain events occur. It typically sets valuation methods, timelines, payment terms, and consequences for nonparticipation. Including a buy-sell clause in a co-ownership agreement reduces uncertainty when an owner wants to exit, ensuring that remaining owners have a clear mechanism to acquire the departing interest or to proceed with a sale under agreed terms.
Right of First Refusal
A right of first refusal gives existing co-owners an opportunity to purchase a departing owner’s share before it is sold to an outside party. The agreement sets notice requirements, timeframes for response, and matching terms that the outside offer must meet. This provision helps preserve ownership among the original group and prevents unexpected co-owners from acquiring a stake without giving current owners an opportunity to retain control of the property and its use.
Operating Budget and Expense Sharing
An operating budget details projected costs for routine maintenance, insurance, taxes, utilities, and anticipated repairs, and sets each co-owner’s share of those expenses. The agreement may require periodic contributions based on ownership percentage or another agreed allocation method. Clear budgeting procedures and default remedies for missed payments help maintain the property and reduce disputes over financial obligations, ensuring necessary work is completed while protecting co-owners from unexpected cost shifting.
Comparing Options: Simple Arrangements vs. Full Co-Ownership Agreements
Owners may weigh informal understandings, simple written notes, or a comprehensive co-ownership agreement when forming joint ownership. Informal arrangements offer speed and low cost but carry higher long-term risk if disagreements arise. Simple written agreements can address a few key issues but may leave gaps. A comprehensive co-ownership agreement provides detailed governance and contingency planning, reducing ambiguity and litigation risk. Gruetli‑Laager owners should evaluate the complexity of their ownership arrangement and potential future changes when deciding how much formality to adopt.
When a Limited or Informal Agreement May Be Appropriate:
Short-Term or Low-Value Joint Ownership
A limited written agreement may be appropriate for short-term co-ownership or for low-value properties where owners share minimal financial exposure and have strong trust among themselves. In such cases, simple terms covering cost sharing, occupancy, and basic transfer restrictions can reduce immediate uncertainty. Even for short-term arrangements, documenting expectations can prevent misunderstandings. Owners should still consider whether future changes could make a more detailed agreement necessary to protect financial interests and relationships over time.
Clear, Aligned Goals Among Co-Owners
When all co-owners share the same intentions for the property and anticipate no changes in participation or priorities, a concise agreement can be sufficient. Such situations are more common when co-owners are close family members with common financial goals or when the property serves a single, consistent purpose like seasonal recreation. Even so, including basic mechanisms for dispute resolution and exit planning can save time and cost if circumstances later change unexpectedly.
Why a Detailed Co-Ownership Agreement May Be Advisable:
Complex Financial or Long-Term Commitments
When co-ownership involves significant financial commitments, rental income, or plans that extend over many years, a detailed agreement helps manage risk and clarify economic responsibilities. Provisions for capital calls, major improvements, and allocation of income reduce the chance of disputes about who pays what and when. A thorough agreement also anticipates changes such as an owner’s death or insolvency. Planning for these contingencies protects each party’s investment and streamlines administration for the property over its lifecycle.
Multiple Stakeholders or Divergent Interests
When owners come from different households or have divergent goals—some seeking rental income while others want personal use—detailed provisions help balance competing interests. The agreement can set clear usage calendars, income distribution formulas, voting thresholds for major decisions, and fair buyout terms to manage tension. Clear conflict resolution mechanisms reduce the likelihood of protracted disputes and provide a pathway to resolve disagreements while preserving property value and relationships among co-owners.
Advantages of a Thorough Co-Ownership Agreement
A comprehensive agreement minimizes ambiguity, creates predictable processes for major decisions, and specifies financial responsibilities in a way that courts and third parties can interpret easily. It reduces the need for litigation by providing agreed-upon dispute resolution methods, such as mediation or appraisal-based buyouts. For Gruetli‑Laager property owners, a tailored agreement also accounts for local tax, title, and zoning considerations, ensuring that ownership arrangements are practical and enforceable under Tennessee law.
Beyond dispute avoidance, a full agreement supports long-term planning by addressing succession, sale triggers, and financing interactions. This clarity can make it easier to work with lenders and title companies when mortgages, refinancing, or sales occur. Clear rules about maintenance and budgeting keep properties in good repair and preserve value. Ultimately, a detailed agreement protects each owner’s expectations and investment while providing a documented method to adapt as circumstances evolve.
Predictability and Financial Clarity
One key benefit is predictable allocation of costs and income, which helps avoid disputes over unpaid bills and unexpected assessments. A budget and contribution schedule clarifies each owner’s obligations and sets remedies for missed payments. Predictable financial terms simplify bookkeeping and support decisions about repairs, improvements, or renting the property. This clarity is particularly valuable for owners who are not cohabiting and rely on consistent accounting to manage their investment in jointly held property.
Streamlined Dispute Resolution and Transfer Processes
A detailed agreement reduces friction by providing defined procedures for resolving disagreements, valuing ownership shares, and handling transfers. Having agreed valuation methods and buyout terms avoids prolonged negotiation when an owner wishes to exit. Specified dispute resolution steps, such as mediation followed by appraisal mechanisms, encourage solutions outside court and preserve working relationships. These provisions save time and cost when compared with the uncertainty and delay of resolving co-ownership conflicts without a written roadmap.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Gruetli‑Laager co-ownership agreement lawyer
- Tennessee co-ownership property agreement
- joint property agreement Gruetli‑Laager
- buy-sell clause real estate Tennessee
- tenancy in common attorney Gruetli‑Laager
- property ownership contract Tennessee
- co-owner dispute resolution Gruetli‑Laager
- real estate agreement drafting Tennessee
- buyout agreement for co-owners
Practical Tips for Managing Co-Ownership Agreements
Document Expectations Early
Put key expectations in writing at the outset to avoid misunderstandings later. Early documentation should cover who will handle routine maintenance, how costs will be shared, and how use of the property will be scheduled. Even a short written agreement that addresses the main financial and operational elements can prevent disputes that arise from differing assumptions. For co-owners in Gruetli‑Laager, aligning on these items early establishes a baseline for cooperation and helps protect relationships as well as the property’s condition and value.
Define Financial Roles Clearly
Plan for Changes in Ownership
Include provisions for buyouts, transfers, and succession to address what happens when an owner wants to leave or passes away. Specify valuation methods, timelines, and payment terms to minimize conflict during ownership transitions. A right of first refusal, for example, gives current owners the chance to retain ownership before an outside party becomes involved. Advance planning ensures smoother transfers and reduces interruptions to property management or unexpected changes in ownership structure.
When to Consider a Co-Ownership Agreement in Gruetli‑Laager
Consider a co-ownership agreement whenever two or more people will share title to residential or investment property, particularly if the arrangement involves financial contributions, rental income, or long-term commitments. Agreements are valuable when owners live apart, when multiple families share a vacation home, or when investors pool resources for a rental property. Clear terms reduce misunderstandings about cost-sharing, maintenance responsibilities, and use, and provide specific methods to resolve disputes, sell, or buy out an owner without resorting immediately to legal proceedings.
Another reason to adopt a formal agreement is planning for life changes that affect ownership, such as death, divorce, incapacity, or relocation. Without written terms, co-owners may face unpredictable outcomes under default property rules and probate processes. A co-ownership agreement allows owners to tailor transfer rights, define successor arrangements, and coordinate with estate planning documents to maintain continuity. For property in Gruetli‑Laager, integrating the agreement with local title practices and potential tax considerations provides greater certainty for all parties involved.
Common Situations Where a Co-Ownership Agreement Is Useful
Frequent scenarios include families buying a vacation home together, friends pooling funds for an investment property, siblings inheriting real estate, or business partners holding property for operations. These arrangements often involve differences in how each owner intends to use the property and how much they will contribute financially. A written agreement helps reconcile those differences by setting usage rules, expense sharing, and processes for selling or transferring interests. The goal is to preserve value while avoiding disputes that could force a sale under unfavorable conditions.
Inherited Property Shared by Multiple Heirs
When siblings or other heirs inherit real estate, they may have differing priorities about sale, retention, or use. A co-ownership agreement clarifies how the property will be managed, how proceeds are distributed, and whether any heirs have the right to buy out others. Including clear valuation and transfer methods prevents stalemates and eases administration during emotionally sensitive transitions. By documenting roles and expectations, heirs can preserve family relationships while managing the inherited asset responsibly.
Friends or Investors Sharing a Rental Property
Investors who purchase rental property together need clear rules for revenue sharing, expense allocation, property management responsibilities, and decision-making about tenant selection and improvements. A formal agreement reduces disputes over accounting, maintenance costs, and profit distribution. It also sets procedures for resolving disagreements and for a partner to exit the investment without disrupting operations. These protections keep the investment focused on returns and reduce the administrative burden on co-owners.
Co-Ownership for a Vacation or Second Home
Shared vacation homes benefit from a written schedule for occupancy, contributions for upkeep, and rules for guest use and rentals. A co-ownership agreement prevents conflicts over prime dates and clarifies financial obligations for seasonal maintenance. It also provides a process to handle requests to sell or transfer ownership, and to address damage or long-term neglect. For Gruetli‑Laager owners, documenting these details preserves the property’s condition and ensures an equitable sharing arrangement among the owners.
Local Co-Ownership Agreement Assistance for Gruetli‑Laager
Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to help Gruetli‑Laager property owners create, review, or update co-ownership agreements that reflect local conditions and Tennessee law. Our office assists clients with drafting clear financial terms, occupancy rules, dispute resolution procedures, and transfer mechanisms. We also coordinate with title companies and other advisors to ensure documents work smoothly with real estate transactions and estate plans. Clients can expect practical guidance aimed at protecting each owner’s interests while keeping the agreement workable and understandable.
Why Work with Our Firm for Co-Ownership Agreements
Choosing a qualified law office to assist with a co-ownership agreement means having a careful review of local legal considerations and title implications. Our approach focuses on listening to each owner’s goals, identifying potential friction points, and drafting clear provisions that reduce future conflict. We provide straightforward explanations of how proposed language will operate in practice and work to align the agreement with estate planning and tax considerations when relevant. This process helps create an enforceable document that serves the group’s needs over time.
We help clients anticipate common scenarios such as an owner seeking to exit, the need for major repairs, or the arrival of heirs. Drafting options include buy-sell arrangements, rights of first refusal, and governance rules that balance fairness with practicality. Our focus is on preventing disputes by setting clear expectations and providing workable procedures for handling changes. For Gruetli‑Laager property owners, that planning reduces distraction and expense if circumstances evolve or disagreements arise among co-owners.
Clients also benefit from assistance integrating the co-ownership agreement with mortgages, title work, and any relevant estate planning documents. Coordinating these elements helps avoid conflicts between instruments and ensures that ownership transitions proceed smoothly. We provide guidance on recordkeeping and enforcement options so that co-owners understand remedies and responsibilities. The result is a practical agreement that supports property management and protects investments over the long term.
Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Discuss Your Co-Ownership Agreement
How We Handle Co-Ownership Agreement Matters
Our process begins with an initial consultation to understand the property, each owner’s objectives, and potential points of disagreement. We then draft proposed terms, circulate them to the parties for comment, and refine the agreement through negotiation until all owners have a clear, enforceable document. When appropriate, we coordinate with title companies, lenders, or tax advisors to ensure compatibility with other transactions. The aim is to deliver a practical agreement that minimizes future disputes and supports efficient property management.
Step One: Initial Review and Goal Setting
We start by reviewing the title, current ownership structure, and any existing informal agreements. During the initial meeting, each co-owner describes their financial contributions, intended use, and exit preferences. This step identifies potential conflicts and areas that require precise language. By clarifying objectives upfront, we can structure a draft agreement that addresses both routine management and foreseeable contingencies, reducing the need for revisions later.
Gathering Ownership and Financial Details
Collecting documentation such as deeds, mortgage statements, insurance policies, and records of prior agreements helps determine ownership percentages and existing obligations. We ask about anticipated expenses, rental plans, and any outside financing that may affect the agreement. Accurate financial information ensures contributions and expense-sharing provisions align with reality and avoid future disputes regarding obligations or accounting.
Clarifying Use and Management Expectations
We discuss how owners intend to use the property, whether it will be rented, how repairs are approved, and who handles daily management. This conversation informs rules for occupancy schedules, guest policies, and maintenance standards. Clear management expectations reduce friction and help draft voting thresholds and decision-making procedures that reflect the owners’ practical needs.
Step Two: Drafting and Negotiation
Based on collected information, we prepare a draft co-ownership agreement that addresses financial contributions, governance, dispute resolution, and transfer mechanics. The draft is circulated to all parties for review and negotiated until the language meets the owners’ practical needs. During negotiation we explain the implications of alternative clauses and recommend language that balances fairness with enforceability under Tennessee law.
Negotiating Financial and Use Provisions
Negotiations often focus on how costs are apportioned, how rental income is handled, and rules for occupancy. We help translate owners’ priorities into precise contractual terms and propose mechanisms for capital calls, emergency repairs, and routine budgeting. Ensuring clear financial provisions reduces future disputes and supports transparent recordkeeping for the property.
Resolving Transfer and Dispute Clauses
We draft and negotiate buy-sell mechanisms, rights of first refusal, and dispute resolution steps that specify timelines, valuation methods, and remedies. These provisions provide structured options if an owner wants to exit or if disagreements arise, encouraging resolution without litigation. Clear transfer rules also help maintain title clarity for future sales or refinancing.
Step Three: Finalization and Implementation
After agreement on all terms, we finalize the document, coordinate signatures, and advise on recording requirements if appropriate. We provide copies to each co-owner and recommend steps for integrating the agreement with estate plans, title records, and lender requirements. Clear implementation ensures that the agreement is accessible and effective when needed.
Execution and Recordkeeping
We guide co-owners through signing formalities and offer recommendations for safe storage and distribution of the executed agreement. Proper recordkeeping makes the agreement usable in future transactions or disputes and helps lenders, title companies, and heirs understand the property governance structure.
Coordinating with Other Advisors
When needed, we coordinate with accountants, title agents, and estate planning advisers to ensure the co-ownership agreement is compatible with tax reporting, refinancing plans, and succession documents. This collaboration helps prevent conflicts among instruments and promotes predictable outcomes for owners and their successors.
Frequently Asked Questions About Co-Ownership Agreements
What is a co-ownership agreement and why do I need one?
A co-ownership agreement is a written contract among property owners that defines financial contributions, use rights, decision-making, and transfer procedures. It supplements the deed by providing practical rules for how owners will manage the property and respond to changes. Having this agreement makes expectations clear, reduces the risk of disputes, and creates predictable processes for common scenarios such as repairs, capital improvements, or changes in ownership.The agreement is particularly useful when owners do not live together, when the property is an investment, or when heirs and multiple families share ownership. For Gruetli‑Laager owners, a tailored agreement aligned with Tennessee law can help coordinate with lenders and title companies and reduce uncertainty in future transactions.
How are expenses and income typically shared among co-owners?
Expense and income sharing is typically based on ownership percentage unless owners agree to a different allocation method. Agreements set out who pays for insurance, taxes, utilities, maintenance, and repairs, and specify how rental income, if any, is distributed. Regular budgeting procedures and periodic reconciliations help keep accounting transparent and prevent surprises for co-owners.Agreements also include remedies for missed payments, such as interest, contribution claims against the delinquent owner, or defined steps for forced sale or buyout in extreme cases. Clear financial provisions protect owners’ investments and provide an enforceable path to resolve disputes over money matters.
What happens if one owner wants to sell their share?
When an owner wants to sell their share, the agreement typically prescribes notice requirements and any preemptive rights for remaining owners, such as a right of first refusal. The document may also set valuation methods and timelines for completing a buyout or sale. This structured process prevents abrupt transfers to outside parties and gives co-owners a fair opportunity to retain the property.If the agreement lacks clear transfer rules, state default rules may apply, which can lead to unintended outcomes. Including step-by-step transfer procedures helps maintain title clarity and reduces the risk of disputes that could interfere with refinancing or sale transactions.
Can a co-ownership agreement control who inherits a share?
A co-ownership agreement can include provisions that limit or guide how an owner may transfer their share, but it generally cannot override estate planning documents or statutory inheritance rights by itself. For example, an owner who holds a tenancy in common can usually leave their share to heirs, but the agreement can require notice, offer rights to co-owners, or set valuation terms affecting how that transfer occurs.To align inheritance outcomes with ownership goals, it is advisable to coordinate the co-ownership agreement with each owner’s estate planning documents. This coordination helps prevent conflicting instructions and ensures smoother transitions for heirs.
How does a buyout provision usually work?
Buyout provisions set the process and terms for one owner to acquire another owner’s interest. They commonly include valuation methods such as appraisal, a fixed formula, or a negotiated price, along with payment terms and deadlines. A clear buyout mechanism provides an orderly path for ownership changes without forcing a sale of the entire property.The agreement may also provide for installment payments or financing options and specify consequences for nonpayment. Including practical timelines and valuation steps reduces disputes and gives both departing and remaining owners predictable options for resolving ownership changes.
Should a co-ownership agreement address rentals and short-term leasing?
Yes, if co-owners plan to rent or use short-term leasing platforms, the agreement should address permissible rental activities, revenue allocation, tenant selection, and maintenance responsibilities. Rules for booking priority, owner usage windows, and how rental income is split prevent conflicts between personal use and commercial operation objectives.The agreement should also consider local regulations, tax implications, and insurance requirements tied to rental activity. Clear policies protect owners from unexpected liabilities and ensure that rental decisions reflect the group’s collective goals for the property.
What dispute resolution options are commonly included?
Common dispute resolution methods include negotiation, mediation, and appraisal-driven buyouts, and some agreements allow litigation as a last resort. Mediation provides a confidential forum to work through disagreements with a neutral facilitator and often preserves relationships. Appraisal and buyout mechanisms give an objective basis for valuation disputes without prolonged court involvement.Specifying stepwise dispute resolution reduces the time and cost of conflicts and often leads to faster, more practical outcomes. Having these procedures in place encourages owners to seek negotiated solutions before resorting to formal legal action.
How does co-ownership interact with mortgages and refinancing?
Co-ownership agreements should address how mortgages and refinancing will be handled, including whether all owners must consent to new financing and how mortgage payments and liability will be shared. Lenders may require clear records of who is responsible for the loan, and the agreement can set procedures for obtaining consent and allocating payment obligations to reflect ownership shares or other agreed terms.When refinancing, coordination with the lender and title company helps prevent conflicts between loan documents and the co-ownership agreement. Clear rules reduce surprises and protect each owner’s interest while preserving the ability to refinance when market conditions make it advisable.
Can the agreement be changed after it is signed?
Yes, a co-ownership agreement can be amended if all parties agree to the changes according to the amendment procedures in the document. The agreement should specify the approval threshold required for amendments and any formalities, such as written consent or notarized signatures. Following the specified amendment process ensures changes are enforceable and prevents disputes about whether an alteration is valid.If owners cannot agree on amendments, the existing agreement’s dispute resolution provisions apply. It is wise to include regular review periods and clear amendment rules so the agreement can adapt to changing circumstances while maintaining legal certainty.
How do co-ownership agreements relate to estate planning?
Co-ownership agreements interact with estate planning by defining how ownership interests will be managed during life and transferred at death. While the agreement can set transfer procedures and preemptive rights, it should be coordinated with wills and other estate documents to ensure a consistent plan. Owners who want particular heirs to inherit their share should confirm that estate documents and the co-ownership agreement operate together without conflict.Coordinating with an estate planning advisor helps avoid unintended outcomes from overlapping instruments. Clear communication among co-owners and consistent documents reduce the risk of disputes and ensure a predictable transition for successors.