Comprehensive Guide to Operating Agreements and Corporate Bylaws
Operating agreements and corporate bylaws are foundational documents that shape how a business operates and how decisions are made. For owners in Oak Hill and greater Davidson County, having clear, well-drafted governing documents helps avoid disputes among members or shareholders, provides a roadmap for management and succession, and protects the company’s long-term stability. This guide explains the purpose of these documents, how they differ, and why tailoring them to your company’s structure and goals matters. Whether forming a new entity or reviewing existing rules, a thoughtful approach reduces ambiguity and preserves business value over time.
Many business owners underestimate the practical impact of operating agreements and bylaws until a conflict or transition arises. These documents establish roles, voting rules, procedures for adding or removing owners, and financial allocation methods. For closely held companies and family-owned businesses in Oak Hill, careful drafting helps maintain family relationships and clarifies expectations across generations. This overview provides guidance on common provisions, typical negotiation points, and practical drafting tips so you can make informed decisions about governance that reflect your company’s needs and long-term objectives.
Why Thoughtful Operating Agreements and Bylaws Matter
Well-crafted operating agreements and bylaws deliver predictability and reduce the risk of costly disagreements by setting out clear decision-making processes and responsibilities. They help protect individual owners’ interests, define financial rights and obligations, and establish dispute resolution mechanisms to avoid protracted litigation. For businesses in Oak Hill, clear governance documents also support financing and potential sale transactions by demonstrating stable internal controls. In addition, these documents provide guidance for unexpected events such as illness, death, or departure of key owners, ensuring continuity and preserving business value for remaining owners and stakeholders.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Business Planning Services
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves clients across Tennessee, including Oak Hill and Davidson County, with business and corporate legal services focused on practical results. Our attorneys work with owners, boards, and managers to draft and revise operating agreements and bylaws that reflect each company’s unique structure and goals. We prioritize clear communication, careful analysis of owner dynamics, and drafting that anticipates future changes. Our approach balances legal protection with operational practicality, helping owners implement governance that supports growth, reduces friction, and aligns with business objectives in a straightforward, enforceable format.
Understanding Operating Agreements and Bylaws
Operating agreements and bylaws are complementary governance instruments that set rules for internal operations. An operating agreement is typically used for limited liability companies and governs member rights, profit distributions, management authority, and transfer restrictions. Bylaws apply to corporations and outline shareholder meetings, director responsibilities, officer duties, and voting procedures. Both documents can be customized to accommodate unique ownership arrangements, protect minority interests, and provide mechanisms for resolving disputes. A tailored document helps ensure the business runs smoothly and reduces the likelihood that conflicts will derail daily operations and long-term plans.
Drafting effective governing documents requires attention to practical business processes as much as legal formalities. Provisions addressing capital contributions, allocation of profits and losses, managerial powers, and decision thresholds should reflect the company’s current practices and anticipated growth. Considerations such as transfer restrictions, buy-sell triggers, and procedures for removing or replacing managers or directors should be explicit to prevent misunderstandings. For companies in Oak Hill, aligning governing documents with Tennessee law and local business realities ensures enforceability and practical utility during both routine operations and times of change.
What Operating Agreements and Bylaws Do
Operating agreements and bylaws are legal instruments that define internal rules for business governance. They describe how authority is allocated among owners, the process for making major decisions, and financial arrangements such as capital calls or distributions. These documents also set procedures for meetings, voting, and recordkeeping, and may include provisions for dispute resolution and buyout formulas. Clear definitions and procedures reduce ambiguity, helping owners understand their rights and responsibilities. Thoughtful drafting anticipates common contingencies and provides mechanisms to address them, which enhances business continuity and stability over time.
Core Provisions and Common Drafting Topics
Key provisions typically cover membership or shareholder structure, management authority, voting thresholds, financial contributions and distributions, transfer restrictions, and procedures for resolving conflicts. Additional topics may include indemnification of managers or directors, confidentiality obligations, and mechanisms for valuing ownership interests during buyouts. Drafting choices often balance owner flexibility with protective measures for minority owners, and should align with tax planning and financing needs. Reviewing operating agreements and bylaws periodically ensures that governance remains appropriate as the business evolves and as ownership changes or the market environment shifts.
Key Terms and Glossary for Business Governance
Understanding common terms used in operating agreements and bylaws helps business owners make informed choices. This brief glossary explains frequently encountered concepts in plain language so you can identify provisions that matter to your company. Familiarity with these terms clarifies drafting decisions and facilitates effective conversations with advisers and co-owners. The glossary covers items such as management structure, transfer restrictions, voting thresholds, buy-sell mechanisms, and indemnification. Knowing these terms will help you evaluate whether proposed language aligns with your company’s goals and risk tolerance.
Management Structure
Management structure describes who controls daily operations and strategic decisions within the company. In an LLC, the structure may be member-managed, with owners directly overseeing operations, or manager-managed, with designated individuals handling management duties. In a corporation, directors and officers fill these roles. The choice of structure affects decision-making speed, owner involvement, and liability considerations. A clear management provision defines appointment and removal procedures, the scope of authority, and reporting requirements, which reduces disputes and clarifies expectations among owners and managers.
Transfer Restrictions
Transfer restrictions limit how and when ownership interests can be sold or assigned. Common mechanisms include right of first refusal, buy-sell agreements, and approval requirements by other owners or the board. Transfer rules protect continuity and prevent unwanted third parties from acquiring ownership. They also establish pricing or valuation methods for buyouts to ensure predictable outcomes. Effective transfer provisions balance the need for liquidity with the desire to preserve the company’s culture and control, creating a clear process for owners who wish to exit or transfer their interests.
Voting Thresholds and Decision-Making
Voting thresholds specify the percentage of votes required to approve different types of actions. Routine business decisions might require a simple majority, while major transactions such as mergers, amendments to governing documents, or large asset sales may require a higher supermajority. Specifying thresholds clarifies how decisions are made and prevents deadlock by including tie-breaking mechanisms or escalation procedures. Well-drafted voting rules align with the company’s risk tolerance and provide a predictable path to resolution when owners disagree about significant choices.
Buy-Sell and Exit Provisions
Buy-sell and exit provisions set out methods for transferring ownership upon events such as retirement, disability, death, or voluntary departure. These clauses commonly include valuation approaches, payment terms, and triggers for purchase obligations. Clear buy-sell language reduces uncertainty and conflict when transitions occur, helping preserve business operations and relationships. Including timelines and financing mechanisms also makes transitions more manageable and can reduce the financial strain on remaining owners who may need to acquire a departing owner’s interest.
Comparing Limited and Comprehensive Approaches
Business owners can choose a limited approach that addresses only a few pressing items, or a comprehensive governance document that anticipates a wide range of contingencies. A limited approach may be faster and less expensive initially but can leave gaps that cause disputes later. A comprehensive document takes more time up front but provides clarity on many foreseeable issues, often saving time and cost over the long term. The right choice depends on the company’s size, complexity, ownership dynamics, and plans for growth. Considering likely future events helps determine whether a broader investment in governance is appropriate.
When a Narrow Governance Document May Be Acceptable:
Simplicity for Single-Owner or Closely Held Businesses
A limited approach can be appropriate for single-owner businesses or very small companies with straightforward operations and little external financing. In those situations, a concise agreement that documents ownership, management authority, and basic financial arrangements can provide adequate protection without excessive cost. The document should still include transfer restrictions and basic succession planning to address unexpected events. Periodic review is advisable as the business grows or new owners are added, since what is sufficient at one stage may become inadequate later as complexity increases.
When Parties Prefer Informal Governance Backed by a Few Key Rules
Some owner groups prefer informal governance with a short written agreement that captures essential commitments while leaving day-to-day management flexible. This can work when owners have strong personal trust and clear, simple expectations. A brief agreement still benefits from outlining dispute resolution steps and buyout mechanics to prevent problems if relationships change. Owners should re-evaluate the document if outside investors arrive or operations scale up, since informal arrangements that worked at a small scale may not protect owners sufficiently as business complexity grows.
When a Comprehensive Governance Document Is Advisable:
Complex Ownership Structures and Outside Capital
A comprehensive operating agreement or set of bylaws is typically necessary when ownership is distributed among multiple investors, when outside capital is involved, or when the company anticipates significant growth or sale. Detailed provisions governing management authority, investor protections, transfer restrictions, and dispute resolution help align expectations and reduce friction. Clear rules can facilitate investment by demonstrating governance controls and predictability. For companies preparing for investment, sale, or a change in ownership, investing in comprehensive governance language can streamline negotiations and protect long-term value.
High-Risk or Highly Regulated Operations
Businesses operating in regulated industries or with material liability exposure often benefit from thorough governance documents that allocate responsibilities and indemnification, and that address compliance duties. Detailed operational controls, insurance and indemnity provisions, and explicit delegation of authority help manage risk and clarify who is accountable for regulatory obligations. Comprehensive documents can also set out recordkeeping and reporting practices that support compliance efforts. When risks are significant, clear governance reduces the chance of disputes that could amplify financial or reputational harm.
Benefits of a Thoughtful, Comprehensive Approach
A comprehensive governing document reduces ambiguity by specifying decision-making processes, financial arrangements, and ownership transfer rules. It helps prevent disputes by creating predictable procedures for handling common and uncommon events. Well-designed provisions support continuity during leadership changes and provide mechanisms for resolving conflicts without resorting to litigation. For owners who plan for growth, sale, or succession, detailed governance can also facilitate smoother transactions and preserve business value by making responsibilities and expectations transparent to buyers and investors.
Comprehensive documents also protect minority owners by including fair valuation methods and approval rights for major decisions, while enabling majority owners to run the business effectively. By addressing contingency planning, buy-sell triggers, and dispute resolution mechanisms, organizations can avoid disruptive surprises. Regular review and updates ensure governance remains aligned with business goals, legal changes, and evolving owner relationships. This proactive approach reduces friction, supports long-term planning, and provides a stable framework for operational and strategic decision-making.
Greater Predictability and Fewer Disputes
When agreements clearly set out how decisions are made and how ownership interests are treated, owners understand the boundaries of authority and the steps required for major actions. This predictability turns potential disagreements into procedural questions with known outcomes, reducing the chance that disputes escalate. Including dispute resolution procedures and buyout terms helps parties resolve disagreements constructively. Predictable governance also supports business continuity by ensuring transitions occur according to established rules rather than ad hoc arrangements that can create conflict and operational disruption.
Enhanced Value for Financing and Sale Transactions
Lenders and buyers look for clear governance as evidence of sound internal controls and predictable operations. Comprehensive operating agreements and bylaws make it easier to evaluate risks, confirm authority for transactions, and assess continuity planning. Well-documented governance can streamline due diligence and reduce negotiating friction, making financing or sale transactions more efficient. For owners planning an eventual sale, aligning governance with transaction expectations can improve marketability and can help secure better terms by demonstrating a stable framework for management and ownership transitions.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Operating agreement Oak Hill TN
- Corporate bylaws Davidson County
- Oak Hill business governance lawyer
- LLC operating agreement Tennessee
- bylaws drafting Oak Hill
- buy-sell agreements Tennessee
- business succession planning Oak Hill
- shareholder agreements Davidson County
- corporate governance Oak Hill
Practical Tips for Your Operating Agreement or Bylaws
Clarify management roles and voting
Define who makes day-to-day decisions and which matters require owner or board approval. Clear allocation of responsibilities prevents confusion over authority, reduces conflicts, and makes internal processes more efficient. Consider thresholds for routine versus major decisions and include tie-breaking or escalation procedures. Explicitly naming decision-makers and outlining their powers and limitations provides a practical framework for daily operations and strategic moves, ensuring everyone understands how and when key actions can be taken.
Include buy-sell mechanics and valuation
Review documents regularly
Governance needs evolve with the business, ownership changes, and legal developments. Schedule periodic reviews to confirm that the operating agreement or bylaws continue to reflect current practices and goals. Updating provisions such as authority limits, distribution policies, and dispute resolution mechanisms keeps governance aligned with real operations. Regular review also provides an opportunity to address new risks or opportunities, ensuring that the document remains a useful tool rather than an outdated formality.
Reasons to Review or Create Governing Documents Now
If you are forming a new business, adding partners, seeking outside investment, or planning for succession, it is an ideal time to draft or revise your operating agreement or bylaws. Addressing governance proactively reduces the chance of disagreements derailing growth and ensures new stakeholders understand decision-making structures. Early attention to allocation of profits, voting thresholds, and transfer restrictions also supports clarity during negotiations and can prevent misunderstandings that might otherwise lead to costly conflict later on.
Existing businesses should consider revising documents when ownership changes, when the company pursues new financing, or when leadership transitions are anticipated. Changes in law or shifts in business strategy may also make current provisions obsolete or counterproductive. A timely review can identify gaps, update valuation methods, add necessary compliance provisions, and confirm that procedures for meetings, recordkeeping, and disputes are practical and enforceable. Taking action sooner rather than later reduces disruption and preserves operational continuity.
Common Situations That Call for Governance Work
Typical circumstances include formation of a new entity, admission of new owners or investors, planned or unexpected owner departures, and preparation for sale or financing. Businesses facing regulatory changes, internal disputes, or family succession issues also benefit from clear governance. Addressing these events with updated documents helps avoid conflicts and supports orderly transitions. Whether you are resolving an immediate dispute or planning for long-term continuity, tailored operating agreements and bylaws provide a structured approach that reduces uncertainty and helps stakeholders focus on business performance.
Adding or Removing Owners
When ownership changes, the operating agreement or bylaws should provide a clear process for admitting new owners, valuing interests, and allocating voting and financial rights. Specifying approval procedures and transfer restrictions prevents disputes about dilution, control, and financial entitlements. Addressing these rules in advance protects both incoming and existing owners, making transitions predictable and preserving operational continuity. Clear steps for onboarding or departing owners reduce negotiation friction and support stable governance during periods of change.
Preparing for Investment or Sale
Prospective investors and buyers review governance documents closely to assess management controls, decision-making authority, and transferability of ownership. Updating bylaws or operating agreements to clarify authority, reporting, and approval thresholds can streamline due diligence and improve transaction outcomes. Addressing valuation and buy-sell mechanisms ahead of time reduces last-minute disputes and helps align expectations, which can speed negotiations and enhance the attractiveness of the business to potential investors or buyers.
Succession and Family Transitions
Family-owned businesses should plan for leadership and ownership transitions to avoid conflicts and preserve relationships. Governance documents can provide clear succession rules, buyout formulas, and conditions for transfers among family members. Including these provisions helps balance family considerations with the company’s operational needs, reducing the potential for disputes that can threaten both family harmony and business continuity. Thoughtful drafting supports orderly transitions and clarifies expectations for future generations.
Oak Hill Attorney for Operating Agreements and Bylaws
If you operate a business in Oak Hill or Davidson County, Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to help draft, review, and update operating agreements and bylaws tailored to your situation. We focus on creating practical governance documents that reflect each company’s structure, ownership goals, and risk profile. Our approach includes identifying common points of friction, proposing clear language to address them, and explaining how provisions will work in real-world scenarios. We aim to make governance documents useful tools for managing your business effectively and reducing the likelihood of disputes.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Governance Documents
Our practice helps business owners in Tennessee navigate the practical and legal aspects of governance drafting. We prioritize listening to owners’ objectives, understanding ownership dynamics, and translating business needs into clear, enforceable provisions. Drafting governance documents that reflect real business practices reduces surprises and supports smoother operations. By combining legal drafting with practical planning, we help clients create documents that are both protective and operationally effective for day-to-day management and long-term planning.
We emphasize collaborative drafting, working with owners to craft language that balances flexibility and protection. Our process involves identifying likely scenarios, proposing practical solutions, and explaining trade-offs so owners can make informed choices. Whether building governance from the ground up or updating existing documents, we aim to deliver clear, actionable provisions tailored to the company’s present circumstances and future plans. This practical focus helps clients implement governance that supports growth and reduces the prospect of long-term disputes.
Clients in Oak Hill and across Davidson County rely on our firm for timely communication and realistic guidance. We help owners prepare for financing, sale, succession, or reorganization by ensuring governance documents address the issues that matter to lenders, buyers, and future leaders. Our goal is to provide documents that are straightforward to follow and that offer predictability during transitions, supporting stability and facilitating business objectives while keeping legal complexity manageable for owners.
Ready to Review or Draft Your Governance Documents? Contact Us Today.
Typical Process for Drafting or Revising Governance Documents
Our process begins with an initial consultation to understand your business structure, ownership goals, and any existing documents. We then identify priority issues and draft proposed language designed to address those needs. After discussing the draft with owners and refining provisions based on feedback, we finalize the document and provide guidance on implementation and recordkeeping. This collaborative approach ensures governance documents are practical and aligned with your objectives, and it allows owners to understand the real-world implications of different drafting choices.
Step One: Information Gathering and Goal Setting
We collect background on your company structure, ownership interests, management preferences, and any existing agreements. Understanding business operations and owner relationships is essential to tailor provisions that reflect real practices and goals. This stage also identifies immediate concerns, such as upcoming ownership changes or pending transactions, which inform drafting priorities. Clear goal-setting ensures the final document aligns with strategic objectives and provides appropriate protections while remaining practical for day-to-day use.
Owner Interviews and Document Review
We conduct interviews with owners and review existing formation documents, financial arrangements, and any prior agreements that affect governance. These discussions reveal important preferences about management, distributions, and succession planning. Reviewing prior documents avoids conflicts with existing commitments and ensures new provisions integrate smoothly. Gathering this information early reduces the need for later revisions and helps tailor language to suit your company’s culture and long-term aims.
Identify Key Issues and Priorities
Based on the information collected, we identify critical topics such as voting thresholds, transfer restrictions, dispute resolution options, and valuation methods. Prioritizing these issues helps structure the drafting process and ensures the most important concerns are addressed first. This step also allows owners to consider trade-offs and decide which protections or flexibilities are most important given their goals and the company’s stage of development.
Step Two: Drafting and Feedback
We prepare an initial draft tailored to the identified priorities, using clear, practical language and offering alternative drafting options when appropriate. The draft highlights choices that have operational or financial implications, and we explain the likely consequences of each option. Owners review the draft and provide feedback, and we incorporate revisions until the document accurately reflects agreed decisions. This iterative process ensures the final governance document is both legally sound and operationally realistic.
Drafting Custom Provisions
Custom provisions may address unique ownership arrangements, staggered voting, minority protections, or tailored buyout formulas. We draft language that is precise enough to be enforceable while avoiding unnecessary complexity. Where appropriate, we include templates or schedules for valuation, notice procedures, and other operational details to guide implementation. Clear drafting helps prevent differing interpretations and supports consistent application of governance rules over time.
Review and Negotiation Support
We assist with discussions among owners or with outside investors to explain the implications of proposed language and to negotiate terms that balance interests. Our role includes translating legal concepts into practical terms owners can use to reach agreement. Where disputes arise, we propose compromise language and alternative provisions that achieve the core goals of the parties while preserving effective governance and operational continuity.
Step Three: Finalization and Implementation
After the document is finalized, we assist with formal adoption procedures such as signing, recording, and distributing copies to owners and key stakeholders. We also provide guidance on required corporate or LLC filings and on recordkeeping practices to ensure governance documents are accessible and consistently followed. Implementation support may include creating templates for notices and consents to help owners follow the agreed procedures in practice and to preserve evidence of compliance when needed.
Adoption and Recordkeeping
Formal adoption may involve meetings, written consents, and updating official company records. We provide checklists and documents to document approval and to maintain minutes or resolutions where required. Good recordkeeping reinforces the enforceability of governance decisions and provides a clear trail for future reference, which is particularly helpful during financing or sale processes.
Ongoing Review and Amendments
Businesses change over time, so governance documents should be revisited periodically. We recommend scheduling reviews after major events such as ownership changes, financing, or leadership transitions. Our firm can assist with amendments and restatements, ensuring updates remain aligned with business objectives and legal requirements. Regular maintenance helps keep governance functional and reduces the likelihood of disputes caused by outdated provisions.
Frequently Asked Questions about Operating Agreements and Bylaws
What is the difference between an operating agreement and corporate bylaws?
An operating agreement governs the internal affairs of a limited liability company and sets out member rights, management authority, and financial allocations, while corporate bylaws provide similar rules for corporations regarding directors, officers, shareholder meetings, and voting procedures. The two serve a comparable purpose for different entity types, ensuring clarity on who makes decisions, how profits and losses are allocated, and how ownership interests are transferred.Choosing the right provisions depends on the entity form and business goals. Both documents should align with formation documents and state law and be tailored to the company’s ownership dynamics. Clear drafting avoids ambiguity and supports operational consistency.
Do I need an operating agreement if my state does not require one?
Even where a state does not require an operating agreement, drafting one is strongly advisable to document owner expectations, management authority, and financial arrangements. A written agreement reduces the likelihood of disputes by setting out procedures for common events such as decision-making, distributions, and transfers of ownership.A formal governance document also helps demonstrate that owners respect entity formalities, which can be important for liability protection and for third parties. For businesses anticipating growth, investment, or a sale, a clear agreement can streamline future transactions and provide needed predictability.
What provisions should be included to handle owner disputes?
Common dispute-related provisions include clear dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, defined buyout procedures, and deadlock resolution methods like buy-sell triggers or third-party valuation. Including a stepwise process for resolving disagreements helps parties address issues early and avoid litigation.Other helpful terms are clear voting thresholds and roles, which reduce ambiguity about who can make decisions. Well-articulated dispute processes and valuation methods for buyouts make it easier to resolve conflicts and preserve business operations while owners work through disagreements.
How are buyouts and valuation typically handled in governing documents?
Buyouts and valuation clauses typically set a method for determining the price of ownership interests, which can be formula-based, use a fixed appraisal process, or reference fair market value established by independent valuation. Payment terms and timing, as well as options for installment payments or financing, should also be addressed to make buyouts practicable.Including clear triggers for buyouts, such as retirement, death, disability, or voluntary sale, reduces uncertainty. Well-defined valuation and payment procedures improve the likelihood of an orderly transition and reduce the risk of contentious disputes at the time of a transfer.
Can governing documents be amended later if circumstances change?
Yes, governing documents can and often should be amended as the business evolves. Amendments typically follow procedures outlined in the existing agreement, such as specified voting thresholds or written consents. Regularly updating documents ensures they remain aligned with current operations, ownership structures, and legal requirements.When making amendments, follow the formal adoption steps to preserve enforceability, including documented approvals and recordkeeping. Consulting with legal counsel can help assess whether revisions are straightforward amendments or require a restatement to avoid confusion.
How do transfer restrictions protect the company and owners?
Transfer restrictions such as rights of first refusal, consent requirements, and buy-sell obligations help prevent undesirable third-party ownership and protect continuity of management. These provisions give current owners the opportunity to control who may join the ownership group and preserve the company’s culture and strategic direction.Transfer rules also create predictable processes for valuation and sale, reducing disputes when an owner wishes to exit. Properly drafted restrictions balance liquidity needs with protection from disruptive ownership changes, supporting long-term stability.
What voting rules should we set for major business decisions?
Voting rules should reflect the business’s decision-making needs, with lower thresholds for routine actions and higher thresholds for major decisions like mergers, amendments to governance, or large asset sales. Defining voting percentages and quorum requirements provides clarity and prevents uncertainty about how decisions are approved.Including tie-breaking or escalation procedures helps resolve deadlocks. The chosen voting structure should balance efficient management with protections for minority owners, matching the company’s governance goals and ownership dynamics.
How often should we review or update our operating agreement or bylaws?
It is prudent to review your operating agreement or bylaws at least when ownership changes, when pursuing financing or sale, or after significant operational or regulatory changes. Regular reviews ensure that governance remains aligned with business needs and legal developments.Many owners schedule periodic reviews every few years or set milestone-triggered reviews tied to strategic events. Timely updates reduce the risk that outdated provisions will cause friction during important transactions or transitions.
Will lenders or investors require specific governance provisions?
Lenders and investors commonly expect clear governance provisions that define management authority, approval procedures for major transactions, and transfer restrictions. Well-drafted documents demonstrate internal controls and predictability, which can facilitate financing and investment due diligence.Specific provisions may be negotiated depending on the nature of the investment or loan. Preparing governance that anticipates investor concerns can streamline negotiations and help secure more favorable terms by showing that decision-making and ownership transfers are governed by clear policies.
How do we ensure our documents comply with Tennessee law?
To ensure documents comply with Tennessee law, governing provisions should be drafted in consideration of state statutes governing LLCs and corporations, as well as applicable case law and procedural requirements. Compliance includes following formalities for adoption and ensuring that provisions do not conflict with mandatory statutory rules.Working with counsel familiar with Tennessee business law helps align documents with legal requirements and local practice. Periodic review can also address any legal changes that affect governance provisions and their enforceability.