Comprehensive Guide to Mortgage and Deed of Trust Matters in Bells
If you are facing issues related to a mortgage or deed of trust in Bells, Tennessee, understanding your rights and options is important. Matters such as disputed payoffs, improper foreclosures, missing reconveyance documents, or confusing lien priorities can affect your home and financial security. This page explains common problems property owners face and outlines practical steps to protect title, challenge lender actions, and explore loss mitigation options. We focus on clear explanations of processes and realistic next steps so you can make informed decisions about resolving mortgage and deed of trust disputes in Crockett County.
Many mortgage and deed of trust disputes arise from mistakes in paperwork, misapplied payments, inaccuracies in chain of title, or mishandled foreclosures. These problems can create barriers when selling, refinancing, or seeking clear title for your property. Our goal here is to give homeowners, buyers, and trustees a plain-language overview of typical scenarios and practical remedies. We cover options such as demand for reconveyance, quiet title actions, negotiating payoff disputes, and defense strategies against wrongful foreclosure, along with tips for documenting your case and communicating effectively with servicers and lenders.
Why Addressing Mortgage and Deed of Trust Issues Matters for Property Owners
Resolving mortgage and deed of trust issues protects your property rights and financial interests by clarifying title and preventing wrongful loss of ownership. Timely action can remove clouded title, stop improper foreclosure actions, and recover funds paid in error. Addressing these matters also preserves your ability to sell or refinance, prevents unexpected liens from impacting transactions, and can limit liability for deficiency judgments depending on the case. Taking a methodical approach helps ensure paperwork is corrected, necessary filings are made with the county recorder, and negotiations with loan servicers move forward constructively to reach fair outcomes for homeowners and lenders alike.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Mortgage Disputes
Jay Johnson Law Firm assists clients in and around Bells, Tennessee with mortgage and deed of trust matters, combining careful document review with practical courtroom and negotiation skills. Our approach centers on a thorough assessment of the loan and title records, identifying irregularities in assignments, reconveyances, and lien priority. We work to resolve disputes through communication with servicers, corrective filings when necessary, and litigation when negotiation is not productive. Clients receive straightforward guidance about potential outcomes, timelines, and costs so they can move forward with confidence during what can be a stressful process.
Understanding Mortgage and Deed of Trust Disputes in Tennessee
Mortgage and deed of trust issues encompass a wide range of problems that affect property ownership and lender rights. Common concerns include disputed assignments of the note, missing reconveyance documents after payoff, unrecorded releases, errors in the public record that create clouds on title, and contested foreclosure procedures. Each situation requires careful review of loan documents, county recorder entries, and communication records with the servicer. Understanding the legal processes available in Tennessee, such as quiet title and reformation, helps property owners evaluate which remedies may be appropriate to clear title and protect ownership interests.
Homeowners and buyers often encounter issues when documentation does not match the expected chain of title or when a lender claims authority without proper recording. Mortgage servicers may pursue foreclosure while payoff statements are inaccurate or reconveyance instruments are delayed. These scenarios can threaten the ability to transfer property or obtain clear financing. Addressing these problems typically involves assembling evidence, requesting corrective recordings, negotiating with lenders, or initiating litigation to enforce recording statutes and quiet title. Early identification and documentation of the problem improves the chances of a favorable resolution.
Key Definitions: Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Payoff, and Reconveyance
In Tennessee, a deed of trust often secures a loan by conveying title to a trustee until the loan is repaid, while a mortgage may create a lien on the property. A payoff occurs when a borrower pays the loan balance and expects the lender to record a release or reconveyance to remove the lien. When that reconveyance is not recorded, a cloud on title can remain, complicating sales or refinancing. Understanding these terms helps property owners identify the paperwork to review, such as the promissory note, deed of trust, recorded assignments, and any instruments purporting to release or transfer the security interest.
Essential Elements and Processes in Resolving Loan and Title Disputes
Resolving mortgage and deed of trust disputes typically involves examining recorded documents, payment histories, and communications with loan servicers. Key steps include obtaining the chain of title, reviewing assignments and reconveyance documents, verifying payoff statements, and requesting corrective recordings. When administrative remedies fail, parties may pursue quiet title actions, seek damages for wrongful foreclosure, or petition the court to reform or cancel defective instruments. Accurate documentation and timely filings with the county recorder play a pivotal role in clearing title and restoring the property owner’s ability to transfer or refinance the property without lingering encumbrances.
Glossary of Common Terms Related to Mortgages and Deeds of Trust
The following glossary entries explain frequently encountered terms in mortgage and deed of trust matters. Familiarity with these terms helps homeowners and buyers understand notices, filings, and steps required to clear title or defend against improper actions. Knowing what a reconveyance, assignment, quiet title action, or deficiency judgment involves makes it easier to gather the right records and communicate effectively with lenders and county offices to resolve problems that affect property ownership and marketability.
Reconveyance (Release) of Deed of Trust
A reconveyance, often called a release, is the recorded instrument that formally removes a deed of trust from the public record after a loan has been paid in full. Without a recorded reconveyance, the lien may still appear on title even though the debt has been satisfied. Homeowners should request a copy of the reconveyance from the lender or trustee and confirm that it has been properly recorded with the county recorder. If the document is missing, a corrective filing or court action may be necessary to clear the cloud on title and restore full record ownership.
Assignment of Mortgage or Deed of Trust
An assignment is a recorded document that transfers the lender’s interest in the mortgage or deed of trust to another entity, such as a loan purchaser or servicer. Accurate and timely assignments preserve chain of title and establish who has authority to enforce the loan. Problems arise when assignments are missing, improperly executed, or recorded out of order, which can lead to disputes over who may foreclose or receive payoff funds. Verifying assignments against payment and servicing records helps determine the appropriate party to contact for resolution.
Quiet Title Action
A quiet title action is a lawsuit used to resolve competing claims and remove clouds on title so ownership is clear for purposes of sale or refinancing. When a recorded instrument improperly affects title, a property owner can seek a court order declaring those claims invalid or cancelled. The process typically requires careful proof of the defect, notice to interested parties, and legal argument to obtain relief. Quiet title suits are a primary tool for homeowners and buyers to secure clean record ownership when administrative remedies have not corrected the public record.
Deficiency Judgment and Foreclosure Remedies
A deficiency judgment is a court order that holds a borrower responsible for any remaining debt after foreclosure sale proceeds are applied if those proceeds do not fully satisfy the loan balance. Whether a lender may pursue a deficiency judgment depends on the terms of the loan and Tennessee law. In some matters, negotiating with the lender to resolve deficiency exposure, pursuing loss mitigation alternatives prior to foreclosure, or challenging foreclosure procedures can help limit or avoid additional monetary liability following a sale.
Comparing Approaches: Limited Administrative Fixes Versus Full Legal Action
When addressing mortgage and deed of trust problems, some situations can be resolved through administrative requests and corrective recordings, while others require litigation. Administrative fixes include demanding a reconveyance, correcting a recording clerical error, or negotiating with a loan servicer for updated payoff records. Those options can be faster and less costly but depend on the lender’s cooperation. Legal action may be necessary when recorded defects persist, when a servicer refuses to correct the record, or when foreclosure is imminent. Understanding the potential outcomes and timelines for each path helps property owners select a practical course.
When Limited Administrative Remedies May Resolve the Problem:
Missing Reconveyance or Release
A missing reconveyance after payoff is often resolved by contacting the lender, trustee, or servicer to request that the release be recorded. Providing proof of payoff, receipt numbers, and the loan account history can prompt a corrective recording without litigation. County recorders can also sometimes assist when paperwork is misfiled. If the originator or trustee has the necessary documents and cooperates, the cloud on title can be removed relatively quickly, allowing the homeowner to complete a sale or refinance without a court case.
Clerical or Recording Errors
Clerical mistakes such as misspelled names, wrong legal descriptions, or improperly recorded instruments may be corrected administratively by recording corrected documents and affidavits. These errors frequently do not require full litigation if the responsible party acknowledges the mistake and files the appropriate corrective instrument. Working with the county recorder and the lender or trustee to file corrected deeds or affidavits can clear title defects efficiently. Accurate documentation and persistence in follow-up are important to ensure the correction is reflected in the official records.
Why a Broader Legal Strategy May Be Necessary:
Disputed Chain of Title or Assignment Irregularities
When assignments are missing, executed improperly, or recorded out of sequence, the identity of the party entitled to enforce the loan can be unclear. These disputes can affect the validity of foreclosure attempts and who may accept payment. In such cases, a comprehensive legal approach that includes review of loan transfers, analysis of recorded assignments, and potential litigation to quiet title or cancel defective instruments may be necessary. A court can resolve competing claims and restore clarity to the public record when administrative routes are ineffective.
Alleged Wrongful Foreclosure or Procedural Failures
If foreclosure procedures were not followed according to Tennessee law or the loan documents, a homeowner may have grounds to challenge the sale and seek remedies in court. Issues such as inadequate notice, failure to establish standing, or improper trustee actions can form the basis of a legal challenge. Pursuing litigation can halt or reverse wrongful actions, seek monetary relief where appropriate, and correct the public record. Comprehensive legal engagement addresses both procedural defects and the underlying title concerns to protect property ownership rights.
Benefits of a Comprehensive Approach to Mortgage and Title Problems
A comprehensive approach combines administrative remedies, negotiation with lenders, and litigation when needed to fully resolve mortgage and deed of trust disputes. This strategy helps ensure that any corrective recordings are properly executed, that servicers are held to account for misapplied payments, and that competing claims are resolved in a single coordinated plan. Working through both paperwork corrections and legal motions reduces the chance of lingering problems and improves the prospects for a clean title, enabling sales, refinancing, or long-term stability for property owners.
Comprehensive resolution also focuses on preventing recurrence by addressing root causes such as chain of title errors, unclear assignments, and servicer record-keeping problems. By combining negotiation and litigation where necessary, property owners can secure enforceable court orders, corrective recordings, and settlements that address monetary and title concerns. This holistic method aims to resolve the legal and practical aspects of a dispute so that the homeowner can move forward without unanswered questions about ownership or future claims against the property.
Clear Title and Marketability
One major benefit of resolving mortgage and deed of trust issues comprehensively is restoring clear, marketable title so the property can be sold or refinanced without unexpected encumbrances. Removing clouds on title, recording proper releases, and resolving competing claims all contribute to a clean public record that lenders and buyers will accept. This outcome protects property value and reduces the risk of future disputes that could arise from unresolved or improperly recorded instruments affecting ownership interests.
Protection from Improper Foreclosure and Financial Liability
A complete legal approach can protect homeowners from improper foreclosure actions and help address potential monetary exposure such as deficiency claims. By challenging unlawful procedures, negotiating with servicers, or seeking court relief, homeowners can prevent wrongful loss of their property and pursue remedies when lender actions have caused harm. This protection helps preserve homeowners’ rights and may result in settlements that address both title defects and financial losses connected to the dispute.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- mortgage release Tennessee
- deed of trust reconveyance Bells TN
- wrongful foreclosure defense Crockett County
- quiet title action Tennessee
- mortgage assignment dispute
- payoff statement errors
- title cloud resolution
- reconveyance missing recording
- lender negotiation Bells TN
Practical Tips for Navigating Mortgage and Deed of Trust Problems
Collect and Preserve All Loan Records
Start by gathering every document related to the loan and property, including the promissory note, deed of trust, payment receipts, payoff statements, correspondence with the servicer, and recorded instruments from the county recorder. These records form the foundation of any request for correction or legal claim. Keep originals safe and make clear copies. Dates, account numbers, and names on records are important, and maintaining an organized timeline of events will help you explain the situation concisely to the lender, county office, or a court if needed.
Request Corrective Recordings Early
Keep Communication Clear and Documented
Maintain written records of your communications with lenders, servicers, trustees, and the county recorder office. When speaking by phone, follow up with an email summarizing the conversation and next steps. Clear documentation helps establish a timeline and supports any formal requests or legal claims. If negotiation or litigation becomes necessary, a well-documented file expedites the process and improves the clarity of your position. Always request written confirmations for payoff amounts and receipt of payments to prevent future disputes.
When to Consider Legal Assistance for Mortgage and Deed of Trust Issues
Consider seeking legal help when title problems persist despite administrative efforts, when foreclosure proceedings are initiated, or when payoff and reconveyance records do not match what you have paid. Legal guidance is also beneficial when multiple assignments create confusion about which party has enforcement rights, or when inaccurate recordings interfere with a sale or refinance. An attorney can advise on options such as quiet title actions, petitions to correct public records, and defenses to foreclosure, helping you understand likely timelines, potential remedies, and how best to protect your property interests.
You should also consider legal assistance if there are allegations of wrongful or accelerated foreclosure, evidence of mishandled payments, or when a lender pursues a deficiency judgment after a sale. Representation can help generate formal demands for reconveyance, negotiate settlements with servicers, and prepare court filings when necessary. Having legal support can improve communication with lenders, increase the chance of favorable outcomes, and address both title and financial consequences of mortgage disputes more effectively than trying to navigate complex record and procedural issues alone.
Common Situations That Lead Property Owners to Seek Help
Typical circumstances include missing or incorrect reconveyance documents after payoff, foreclosure initiated despite full or partial payments, disputed assignments that cloud the chain of title, unrecorded lien releases, and recording errors that misidentify the property or parties. Buyers discovering unexpected liens during a title search and homeowners who receive notices of enforcement actions despite current payments also commonly need assistance. Each of these scenarios can threaten the ability to sell, refinance, or retain property, and timely action to document and address the issue is important.
Missing Reconveyance After Payoff
When a lender fails to record a reconveyance after the loan is paid, the deed of trust can remain on record and obstruct transactions such as refinancing or sale. This problem can usually be addressed by requesting the lender or trustee to file the reconveyance and by providing proof of payoff and payment history. If the responsible party does not cooperate, additional steps such as filing an action to compel reconveyance or seeking a court order to remove the cloud may be necessary to restore clear title for the homeowner.
Foreclosure Proceedings Despite Payment Disputes
Occasionally, servicers begin foreclosure while payoff or modification discussions are ongoing or payments have been made but not properly credited. In these situations, documenting all payments and communications and promptly challenging the foreclosure can prevent wrongful loss of property. Administrative negotiation with the servicer may resolve the problem, but if foreclosure actions proceed, a legal response is required to assert defenses, seek a stay, or pursue remedies to correct the record and restore the owner’s rights.
Conflicting Assignments and Chain of Title Problems
When multiple assignments are recorded inconsistently or out of chronological order, it can be unclear who holds the right to enforce the loan. Such conflicts can threaten the validity of a foreclosure or complicate payoff acceptance. Resolving these problems often requires thorough title research, review of transfer documents, and possible court intervention to quiet title or declare certain instruments invalid. A coordinated approach addresses both the legal ownership question and any practical steps needed to clear the public record.
Local Counsel for Mortgage and Deed of Trust Problems in Bells
Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to assist Bells area property owners with mortgage and deed of trust concerns, offering careful review of title records, assistance with corrective recordings, negotiation with servicers, and litigation when necessary. We help clients understand the steps required to clear title, respond to foreclosure actions, and address payoff discrepancies. If you need help documenting your case or pursuing a remedy to protect your property rights, reach out to discuss your circumstances and the practical options available under Tennessee law.
Why Choose Our Firm for Mortgage and Title Disputes
Our practice focuses on clear communication, thorough document review, and practical solutions for clients facing mortgage and deed of trust issues. We prioritize identifying the exact defect in the record, explaining the available remedies, and pursuing the most efficient path toward resolution. Whether that means obtaining a corrective reconveyance, negotiating with a servicer, or filing a quiet title action, we guide clients through the steps and provide candid assessments of likely outcomes and timelines so they can make informed decisions.
We work closely with clients to assemble the necessary evidence, coordinate with title companies and county recorders, and take appropriate legal action when administrative efforts fail. Our process emphasizes documentation and timely follow-up to ensure filings are processed and the public record reflects the true status of ownership. Clients benefit from a hands-on approach that seeks practical resolutions while preserving the legal options that may be needed to fully protect property interests in Bells and Crockett County.
When a matter requires court involvement, we prepare a focused legal strategy to address the facts and applicable law, aiming to secure clear title or correct wrongful actions in an efficient manner. We also help clients understand potential remedies, including cancellation of defective instruments, rescission where applicable, and negotiating settlements to resolve monetary claims. Our goal is to help homeowners and buyers achieve a stable outcome that allows them to move forward with confidence in their property transactions.
Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Discuss Your Mortgage or Deed of Trust Concern
How We Handle Mortgage and Deed of Trust Cases
Our process begins with an initial case review to identify recorded documents, payment histories, and the specific defect affecting title or enforcement. We then outline possible administrative remedies and legal actions, including requests for corrective recordings, demands to the servicer, or filing court petitions. Throughout the process we keep clients informed of developments, estimated timelines, and next steps. Our goal is to resolve matters efficiently while preserving the homeowner’s rights and ensuring the public record accurately reflects ownership and lien status.
Step One: Document Collection and Title Review
The first step is collecting all relevant documents and performing a comprehensive title search to identify recorded instruments, assignments, reconveyances, and any clouds on title. This includes obtaining copies from the county recorder, requesting loan histories from the servicer, and reviewing the original note and deed of trust. A careful comparison of these records helps pinpoint discrepancies and determines whether administrative correction, negotiation, or litigation is the most effective next move.
Gathering Loan and Payment Records
Collecting the loan documents and payment records is essential to establish whether the debt has been paid, whether payments were properly credited, and to identify any discrepancies. We request account histories and payoff statements from servicers and compare them to bank records and receipts. This documentation is important both for proving a payoff or misapplication of funds and for establishing the factual basis for requests to record reconveyance or to challenge lender actions.
Conducting a Title Search and Chain of Title Analysis
A thorough title search reveals the recorded instruments affecting the property, including deeds, liens, assignments, and releases. We analyze the chain of title to determine if assignments were properly executed and recorded and to identify any irregularities that might create competing claims. This analysis helps determine whether the problem can be remedied administratively or whether court action is required to quiet title or cancel defective instruments.
Step Two: Administrative Remedies and Negotiation
After identifying the issue, we pursue administrative remedies such as requesting reconveyance, filing corrective recordings, and negotiating with the loan servicer to update payoff records or stop wrongful enforcement actions. We draft formal demands, document everything in writing, and escalate to higher levels within the servicer when necessary. Many matters resolve at this stage if the responsible party cooperates and corrects the record, saving time and expense compared to litigation.
Requesting Corrective Recordings and Reconveyance
When a reconveyance or release is missing or defective, we formally request the lender or trustee to prepare and record the appropriate instrument, supplying any proof of payoff required. We follow up with the county recorder to confirm the recording and ensure the title reflects the change. Timely follow-up and written documentation of the request help create a record of the effort to resolve the issue administratively.
Negotiating with Servicers to Resolve Payoff or Assignment Disputes
Negotiation with servicers may resolve disputes over payoff amounts, misapplied payments, or the proper recipient of payoff funds when assignment records are unclear. We present the evidence, propose solutions such as corrected payoffs or mutual releases, and work toward agreements that restore clear title. Documentation of the negotiation process and any agreed terms is critical to secure a durable resolution and prevent recurring issues in the county record.
Step Three: Litigation and Court Remedies When Needed
If administrative remedies and negotiation fail to correct the record or stop improper enforcement, we prepare and file appropriate court actions. These may include quiet title suits to remove clouds on title, motions to enjoin wrongful foreclosure, or petitions to cancel defective instruments. Litigation aims to obtain a binding court order that resolves competing claims, corrects public records, and secures the property owner’s rights when other avenues have been exhausted.
Quiet Title Actions and Requests to Cancel Defective Instruments
Quiet title actions seek a judicial declaration of clear ownership by removing invalid or improperly recorded claims. These actions require careful proof regarding recorded instruments and notice to interested parties. When successful, a court order directs the county recorder and establishes a clear chain of title. Quiet title suits are effective when recorded defects cannot be corrected through administrative filings or when competing claims remain unresolved.
Injunctions and Foreclosure Defense
When a foreclosure is imminent or has procedural defects, filing a petition for injunctive relief or pursuing foreclosure defenses can halt the sale and allow the court to evaluate the legality of the lender’s actions. These measures provide an opportunity to challenge standing, notice, or trustee procedures and to seek remedies such as reversal of a sale or damages. Court intervention protects the homeowner while the disputed issues are resolved under judicial oversight.
Frequently Asked Questions About Mortgage and Deed of Trust Issues
What should I do if a reconveyance is missing after I paid off my loan?
If a reconveyance is missing after you paid off your loan, begin by collecting proof of payment, including canceled checks, bank statements, payoff letters, and the lender’s payoff receipt. Contact the lender, trustee, or servicer in writing to request that they prepare and record the reconveyance. Keep copies of all correspondence and confirmations. If the lender does not cooperate, a court action to compel reconveyance or a quiet title suit may be necessary to remove the cloud on title and ensure the public record reflects the payoff.
How can I challenge a foreclosure if I believe it was handled improperly?
To challenge a foreclosure you believe was improper, document all relevant communications, payments, notices, and account records. Review the foreclosure notice for compliance with Tennessee procedural requirements and check the chain of title to determine who has standing to foreclose. If you identify procedural defects, a petition to enjoin the sale or a defense filed in court may halt the foreclosure. Seeking legal review early preserves options and ensures the factual record is properly assembled for any court challenge.
What is a quiet title action and when is it necessary?
A quiet title action is a lawsuit used to resolve competing claims and clear defects in the recorded chain of title. It is necessary when administrative corrections and negotiations fail to remove clouds on title or when competing recorded instruments create uncertainty about ownership. The court evaluates the evidence, gives notice to interested parties, and issues a judgment that defines the valid ownership claims and may cancel or reform defective recordings to restore clear title for sale or refinancing.
Who can I contact if a payoff statement from the lender is incorrect?
If a lender’s payoff statement appears incorrect, request a detailed account history and a written explanation from the servicer. Provide records of your payments and any prior payoff communications. If the servicer refuses to correct obvious errors, escalate within the servicer’s compliance or loss mitigation departments and document each step. When administrative efforts fail, legal remedies include requesting corrective recordings or pursuing court action to resolve the dispute and to ensure that any recorded releases reflect the true payoff status.
Can a recorded assignment be invalidated if it was recorded out of order?
An assignment recorded out of order or with defects can create uncertainty about which party has enforcement rights. Whether an assignment can be invalidated depends on the facts, the form and timing of the documents, and how Tennessee law treats chain of title issues. In some cases, a court may cancel or recharacterize an assignment through litigation such as a quiet title suit. A thorough review of recording dates, signatures, and supporting documents is necessary to determine the appropriate remedy.
What are my options when a servicer misapplies payments?
When a servicer misapplies payments, gather all proof of payment and correspondences and demand a correction and accurate account reconciliation. Request written confirmation of any corrections and follow up with the county recorder if a release or reconveyance depends on proper payoff crediting. If the servicer does not fix the records, legal action may be necessary to recover funds paid in error, correct the public record, and seek relief from wrongful enforcement actions based on the misapplied payments.
Will a missing reconveyance automatically prevent me from selling my home?
A missing reconveyance can complicate a sale or refinance because title searches will show the lien still of record. Many sales close with a seller resolving the issue before transfer by obtaining a recorded release or a court order removing the cloud. Communicate early with the title company and buyer to explain the situation and pursue corrective filings. When administrative resolution is not possible, a quiet title action or a court order compelling reconveyance may be required before the transaction can proceed smoothly.
How long does it typically take to resolve a title cloud through the courts?
The time to resolve a title cloud through the courts varies based on case complexity, the need to serve multiple parties, and the court’s schedule. Simple quiet title actions may resolve in a few months, while contested matters involving multiple claimants or foreclosure defenses can take longer. Preparing thorough documentation, pursuing settlement where possible, and clarifying issues early can reduce delays. A realistic timeline is provided after an initial review that assesses the factual and procedural complexities of the case.
What is a deficiency judgment and could I face one after foreclosure?
A deficiency judgment holds a borrower responsible for any remaining loan balance after foreclosure sale proceeds are applied. Whether a lender can pursue a deficiency judgment depends on the loan terms, the nature of the foreclosure, and Tennessee law. In some cases, negotiating a settlement or challenging the foreclosure process may reduce or eliminate deficiency exposure. Understanding the risk and available defenses early can help homeowners take steps to limit potential post-sale liability.
How do I prove a lender accepted a payoff but failed to record a release?
To prove a lender accepted a payoff but failed to record a release, collect documentary evidence such as payoff receipts, bank records showing payment transfers, and written confirmation from the lender or servicer. Include any correspondence that acknowledges the payoff or confirms receipt. If the lender refuses to record the release despite proof, legal remedies include filing a petition to compel reconveyance or initiating a quiet title action to have the court order removal of the cloud and set the public record straight.