Comprehensive Guide to Operating Agreements and Corporate Bylaws in Elizabethton
Operating agreements for LLCs and bylaws for corporations set the baseline rules for how a business runs, how decisions are made, and how ownership and management interact. For business owners in Elizabethton and Carter County, clear governing documents reduce uncertainty, manage expectations among owners, and provide a framework for resolving disputes without prolonged conflict. This page explains the key issues owners face when forming or updating operating agreements and bylaws and describes how careful drafting protects both day-to-day operations and long-term value for the business and its members or shareholders.
Whether you are forming a new company, reorganizing ownership, or preparing for a sale or succession, properly drafted organizational documents help avoid disagreements and legal pitfalls. Operating agreements and bylaws should reflect the business model, state requirements, and owners’ priorities such as voting procedures, profit distributions, transfer restrictions, and dissolution steps. Local knowledge of Tennessee law and practical drafting approaches ensure documents are functional for the business in Elizabethton and compliant with state filing and governance expectations so owners can focus on running their companies with greater clarity and confidence.
Why Strong Operating Agreements and Bylaws Matter for Your Business
A well-crafted operating agreement or set of corporate bylaws prevents misunderstandings, sets clear decision-making paths, and protects the business from internal disputes that can interrupt operations. These documents establish roles and powers for managers or directors, detail how profits and losses are shared, and specify procedures for adding or removing owners. They also set out what happens if an owner dies, becomes disabled, or wants to sell. The predictable structure created by these agreements saves time and expense by avoiding ad hoc solutions and helps preserve relationships and business continuity.
How Jay Johnson Law Firm Supports Business Governance in Tennessee
Jay Johnson Law Firm assists business owners across Tennessee with formation documents, operating agreements, and corporate bylaws tailored to each company’s needs. The firm focuses on clear drafting that anticipates common disputes and supports sound management practices. From family-owned companies to small corporations and multi-member LLCs, the approach is practical and grounded in Tennessee business law, helping clients adopt governance documents that align with their long-term goals while remaining flexible enough for inevitable changes in ownership or operations.
Understanding Operating Agreements and Corporate Bylaws
Operating agreements and bylaws are the internal rules that govern different types of business entities: operating agreements apply to limited liability companies, while bylaws govern corporations. These documents complement state statutes and, where permitted, can modify default rules to better suit the owners’ needs. They cover practical topics such as voting rights, meeting requirements, capital contributions, management authority, and distribution procedures. Knowing which provisions to include depends on factors like ownership structure, management preferences, and future plans for investment, sale, or succession.
Because state law provides default governance rules, owners who rely solely on statutory defaults may find gaps when conflicts arise. Tailored operating agreements and bylaws allow businesses to define customized processes for decision-making, dispute resolution, and ownership changes. These documents also support legal protections for owners and managers by documenting agreed-upon roles and expectations. For businesses operating in Elizabethton, careful alignment with Tennessee law and attention to the company’s particular circumstances produces governance documents that are both practical and durable.
Key Definitions and How Governing Documents Function
An operating agreement is a binding contract among LLC members describing ownership percentages, management, distributions, voting rules, and procedures for changes in membership. Corporate bylaws perform a similar function for corporations by setting out director powers, officer roles, shareholder meetings, and recordkeeping requirements. Both documents translate high-level legal requirements into operational rules that day-to-day managers and owners can follow. By recording agreed procedures in writing, businesses minimize uncertainty, provide clear reference points during disagreements, and create continuity across leadership changes.
Core Elements to Include in Your Operating Agreement or Bylaws
Important provisions to consider are ownership structure, capital contributions, profit and loss allocation, voting thresholds for routine and major decisions, management duties, meeting notice and quorum rules, transfer restrictions, buy-sell mechanisms, dispute resolution methods, and procedures for dissolution. Including clear timelines and decision-making protocols reduces friction and helps the business respond smoothly to changes. Drafting these elements with foresight avoids gaps that lead to litigation and ensures that governance documents can function as an effective roadmap for members, managers, officers, and directors.
Key Terms and Glossary for Business Governance Documents
Understanding common terms used in operating agreements and bylaws makes it easier to negotiate and adopt provisions that work for your business. This glossary highlights phrases you will encounter and explains how they apply in Tennessee business practice. Clear definitions reduce ambiguity, promote consistent application of the rules, and make future amendments simpler because everyone shares the same baseline understanding of important concepts used throughout the documents.
Member vs. Manager (LLC)
In LLC governance, the terms ‘member’ and ‘manager’ describe distinct roles: members are owners of the company and may participate in voting on major issues, while managers are responsible for day-to-day operations when the LLC is manager-managed. Some LLCs choose member-management, where owners handle daily duties, while others appoint one or more managers who may or may not be members. The operating agreement should state which structure applies and define the authority, duties, and limitations for managers to avoid overlap or confusion between ownership and management functions.
Shareholder Rights (Corporations)
Shareholder rights refer to the entitlements of stockholders in a corporation, including the right to vote on certain corporate actions, receive dividends when declared, inspect corporate records under defined conditions, and participate in shareholder meetings. Bylaws outline how shareholders exercise these rights, including notice periods and quorum requirements for meetings. They may also specify primary methods for shareholder voting, proxy procedures, and how votes on mergers, major acquisitions, or changes to corporate structure will be handled to ensure predictable shareholder involvement in important company decisions.
Voting Thresholds and Quorum
Voting thresholds determine the level of agreement required to approve actions, with common thresholds including simple majority, supermajority, or unanimous consent depending on the decision’s significance. A quorum is the minimum number of owners, members, or shareholders required to hold a valid meeting or vote. Both concepts are essential to ensure decisions are made legitimately and reflect sufficient participation. Operating agreements and bylaws should specify quorum rules and numerical thresholds for different categories of decisions to avoid disputes over the validity of corporate actions.
Transfer Restrictions and Buy-Sell Provisions
Transfer restrictions limit when and how an ownership interest can be sold or transferred, often requiring approval by other owners or offering existing owners a right of first refusal. Buy-sell provisions set out processes for valuing and transferring an ownership interest following triggering events such as death, disability, retirement, or disputes. These clauses preserve ownership stability, prevent unwanted third-party owners, and provide a fair mechanism for members or shareholders to exit while keeping continuity for the business.
Comparing Limited and Comprehensive Approaches to Governance Documents
Businesses can adopt a limited, streamlined governance document that addresses only fundamental issues or choose a comprehensive agreement that anticipates many potential future scenarios. Limited approaches minimize upfront complexity and cost but may leave gaps that require resolution later. Comprehensive agreements take longer to prepare and review but create a detailed framework that reduces the chance of disputes and makes transitions smoother. Choosing the right level of detail depends on the company’s ownership structure, growth plans, and tolerance for future negotiation among owners.
When a Streamlined Operating Agreement or Bylaws Are Appropriate:
Small Owner Groups with Clear Relationships
A limited governance document can be suitable where a small group of owners have strong trust and shared expectations, such as a closely held family business or startup among longtime partners. In these situations, keeping the agreement concise allows the owners to memorialize core arrangements like ownership percentages and basic management authority without prolonged negotiation. However, even simple agreements should include basic transfer restrictions and dispute resolution provisions to protect minority owners and provide a path forward if relationships change.
Low-Risk Operations with Stable Ownership
If ownership is stable and the business has limited external investment or turnover, a streamlined document may suffice for the near term. When activities are predictable and owners anticipate limited changes, a concise operating agreement or bylaws that set out voting rights, profit distribution, and simple meeting procedures can provide adequate governance. It remains important to review such documents periodically to ensure they continue to match the business’s circumstances and to add provisions if the ownership structure or strategic plans evolve.
Why a Detailed, Forward-Looking Governance Agreement May Be Preferable:
Complex Ownership or Outside Investment
When multiple owners, investor funding, or outside stakeholders are involved, a comprehensive agreement becomes important to define rights, prioritize capital distributions, and set protections for all parties. Detailed provisions on voting structures, preferred returns, dilution protections, and transfer limits help avoid contentious disputes. Well-crafted documents anticipate investor concerns and provide clear rules for bringing new capital or altering ownership, which helps preserve business value and maintain productive relationships among owners and investors.
Anticipated Growth, Sale, or Succession Planning
If a business plans to grow, bring in new management, sell assets, or undergo a succession event, having thorough governance documents can streamline those transitions. Provisions dealing with valuation methods, buyout mechanics, leadership succession, and approval thresholds for major transactions reduce uncertainty and transaction costs at critical moments. Planning ahead in written form helps ensure the company can adapt to change while preserving business continuity and protecting the interests of owners who may remain involved after a sale or leadership change.
Benefits of a Thorough Operating Agreement or Bylaws
A comprehensive operating agreement or bylaws provide predictability, reduce the likelihood of litigation, and set clear procedures for common and unusual events. These documents make it easier to onboard new owners or investors by defining expectations up front and provide reliable mechanisms for resolving disagreements. Detailed governance also increases the company’s appeal to potential buyers or lenders by demonstrating sound management practices and documented internal controls that reassure outside parties reviewing the business.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is the ability to tailor provisions to your business model, such as phased vesting for ownership, tailored voting rights for different classes of owners, and dispute resolution methods like mediation or arbitration that limit public litigation. By anticipating and documenting these processes, the company reduces friction during transitions and creates a clearer path for long-term planning, enabling owners to focus on growth rather than re-negotiating basic governance points when a new challenge arises.
Reduced Conflict and Faster Decision-Making
With detailed rules in place for voting, meeting procedures, and authority limits, the company can resolve routine matters efficiently without prolonged debate. Clear escalation paths for disputes and well-defined officer or manager responsibilities ensure day-to-day decisions are made promptly. This reduces interruptions to operations and helps the business act swiftly in competitive situations. A predictable framework also helps newer owners understand their role and responsibilities, which supports smoother governance and fewer surprises when decisions must be implemented quickly.
Stronger Protections for Owners and the Business
Detailed transfer restrictions, buy-sell clauses, and valuation mechanisms help maintain control over ownership and provide fair exit options for departing owners. These provisions protect minority and majority owners by spelling out rights and responsibilities and creating predictable outcomes for ownership changes. By documenting processes for capital calls, distributions, and dispute resolution, a comprehensive agreement reduces the risk of ad hoc decisions that could harm relationships or the business’s financial stability, supporting long-term planning and continuity.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Elizabethton operating agreement lawyer
- Tennessee bylaws attorney
- LLC operating agreement Elizabethton
- corporate bylaws Tennessee
- business formation Carter County
- buy-sell agreement Elizabethton
- ownership transfer restrictions TN
- governance documents for LLCs
- bylaws drafting service Hendersonville
Pro Tips for Drafting Effective Governance Documents
Be Specific About Voting and Decision Authority
Specify who has authority to make everyday business decisions and who must approve major transactions to avoid ambiguity. Define thresholds for ordinary decisions and separate higher thresholds for material corporate actions, such as selling the company or taking on debt above a set limit. Include rules for calling meetings, providing notice, and establishing quorum to ensure that decisions are valid when executed. Clear lines of authority reduce delays and minimize internal disputes when important choices must be made quickly.
Include Practical Buy-Sell and Transfer Mechanisms
Plan for Dispute Resolution and Succession
Include practical dispute resolution procedures, such as mediation followed by arbitration, to handle disagreements outside of court and preserve business relationships. Document succession plans for leadership changes, including interim authority and permanent replacement processes. Having these provisions in place provides certainty and reduces the cost and disruption of contested internal disputes. Clear dispute and succession rules support smoother transitions that keep operations stable during periods of change.
Reasons to Create or Update Operating Agreements and Bylaws
Updating or creating governance documents is important whenever ownership changes, the business seeks financing, a sale is being considered, or operational responsibilities evolve. Fresh documents address contemporary risks, reflect current ownership percentages, and incorporate lessons learned from past disputes. Businesses that periodically review their operating agreements and bylaws reduce legal uncertainty and ensure governance continues to serve both management and owners’ goals without leaving unresolved gaps that could hinder growth or complicate transactions.
Small changes like clarifying voting thresholds, adding buy-sell terms, or updating manager authority can have outsized benefits in preventing conflict and smoothing transactions. For companies preparing to take on investors or planning succession in family-owned businesses, well-drafted documents increase confidence among stakeholders by documenting expectations and dispute-resolution paths. Taking time to formalize these matters preserves relationships among owners and helps the business capitalize on opportunities while reducing the risk of disruptive disagreements.
Common Situations That Make Governance Documents Necessary
Typical circumstances that call for drafting or revising operating agreements and bylaws include formation of a new company, admission of new owners or investors, pending ownership transfers, disputes among owners, succession planning, or preparing for a sale. Each scenario benefits from tailored provisions that address the specific risks and procedures relevant to that event. Having clear governance in place beforehand reduces negotiation time and provides a framework for orderly transitions when changes occur.
Bringing in New Investors or Partners
When a company seeks outside investment or adds new partners, governance documents should address dilution, voting rights, preferred returns, and investor protections. Clearly defined terms help align expectations and protect the company’s strategic direction. Detailed documents covering capital contributions, reporting obligations, and transfer restrictions provide assurance to incoming investors and protect existing owners by setting terms for future capital raises and adjustments to ownership structure.
Ownership Transitions and Succession
Succession planning for family businesses or key owner departures requires buy-sell mechanics, valuation methods, and interim management rules. Drafting clear succession provisions prevents disputes and ensures continuity of operations when ownership changes hands. Such provisions can include phased transfers, options for existing owners to purchase interests, and defined steps for appointing new managers or directors, which makes leadership transitions less disruptive for employees, customers, and business partners.
Disputes Between Owners
When owners disagree about strategy, distributions, or management, documented dispute resolution processes and decision-making rules help resolve issues in an orderly way. Listing escalation steps like mediation and arbitration ahead of time reduces the likelihood of costly court battles and preserves business relationships. Having written procedures also gives neutral criteria for resolving conflicts, which can de-escalate personal disputes and focus attention on practical solutions for the company.
Elizabethton Operating Agreement and Bylaws Attorney
Jay Johnson Law Firm is available to assist business owners in Elizabethton, Carter County, and across Tennessee with drafting and updating operating agreements and corporate bylaws. The firm helps translate your business goals into practical governance documents tailored to your company’s ownership, management model, and plans for growth or succession. Whether creating initial formation documents or revising existing bylaws, the goal is to produce clear, enforceable rules that support smooth operations and protect owner interests over time.
Why Work with Jay Johnson Law Firm for Governance Documents
Jay Johnson Law Firm provides focused, practical legal drafting designed for Tennessee small businesses and family-owned companies. The firm works with clients to identify governance priorities, translate them into appropriate provisions, and balance clarity with flexibility. Drafting emphasizes usable language and realistic procedures rather than generic boilerplate so the documents function well in daily business life and during exceptional events that require formal processes.
Clients receive guidance on state filing requirements, recommended governance practices, and options for dispute resolution and ownership transfer that reflect the company’s goals. The process includes review and explanation of common pitfalls, tailored clauses to address specific concerns, and practical recommendations for implementing and updating documents as the business evolves. This approach helps owners avoid future disputes and keeps governance aligned with business strategy.
The firm also coordinates with accountants and financial advisors when needed to address valuation and tax considerations that intersect with ownership transfers and buy-sell mechanisms. This collaborative approach aims to ensure governance documents are workable from both legal and financial perspectives and that owners understand the implications of different drafting options for the company’s long-term plans.
Ready to Discuss Your Operating Agreement or Bylaws?
How We Prepare Governing Documents at Jay Johnson Law Firm
The process begins with a consultation to understand the company’s structure, ownership goals, and anticipated future events such as investment or succession. Next, the firm reviews any existing documents and identifies gaps or conflicts. Drafting follows, with clear language tailored to the company’s management model and key decision points. After client review and revisions, the final document is delivered along with guidance for implementation and recommendations for periodic review to keep the document current with operations and legal developments.
Step One: Initial Consultation and Document Review
In the initial stage, the firm gathers information about ownership, management arrangements, capital structure, and objectives for the company’s governance. Existing formation documents and prior agreements are reviewed to identify inconsistencies and update needs. This meeting sets priorities for drafting and pinpoints any immediate changes required to protect owner interests. The goal is to build a drafting plan that addresses both immediate concerns and foreseeable future events.
Information Gathering and Goal Setting
The firm asks detailed questions about ownership percentages, expected capital contributions, management responsibilities, transfer expectations, and business strategy. Clarifying these areas early helps ensure the resulting documents align with real operational needs and owner intentions. The information-gathering phase also surfaces potential conflicts and areas where customized provisions are advisable to prevent disputes or to accommodate unique business arrangements.
Review of Existing Documents and Legal Requirements
Existing bylaws, operating agreements, partnership agreements, and relevant contracts are examined for inconsistencies and conflicts with Tennessee law. The review identifies provisions that should be retained, amended, or removed. This step ensures any new or revised document works with prior agreements and meets statutory requirements, providing a solid foundation for the drafting stage that follows and helping to avoid conflicts between documents down the road.
Step Two: Drafting and Client Review
Drafting focuses on practical, readable language that addresses identified priorities such as voting rights, distribution rules, and transfer restrictions. The firm prepares a draft for client review and discussion, highlighting key choices and their implications. Clients are encouraged to ask questions and request adjustments so the document accurately reflects their intentions and the company’s operational realities before finalization.
Creating a Draft That Reflects Business Needs
The draft integrates agreed-upon governance structures and explains the rationale for major provisions so owners can make informed choices. This stage balances legal protections with practical usability, aiming to produce documents that managers and owners will actually follow. Including clear definitions and step-by-step procedures reduces ambiguity and ensures the governance framework operates smoothly in routine and extraordinary circumstances.
Client Feedback and Iterative Revisions
After receiving the draft, clients review the document and provide feedback on specific clauses and overall structure. The firm incorporates revisions and clarifications until the owners are comfortable with the final language. Iterative drafting ensures that the document reflects real-world expectations and that contentious areas are resolved before the document becomes binding, minimizing later disputes and ensuring smoother governance.
Step Three: Finalization and Implementation
Once the final draft is approved, the firm delivers the executed operating agreement or bylaws along with guidance on maintaining corporate records, holding required meetings, and implementing the agreed procedures. The firm can prepare any ancillary documents needed to effect changes such as membership admission documents, stock certificates, or board resolutions and advise on filing or recordkeeping practices to preserve the company’s legal protections.
Execution, Recordkeeping, and Formal Adoption
The firm assists with formal adoption steps, including execution by owners or the board, recording adoption in meeting minutes, and preparing any necessary resolutions or filings. Proper recordkeeping ensures that the governance changes are recognized internally and by third parties such as banks or investors. This helps maintain clear corporate formalities that support limited liability protections and the enforceability of the governance documents.
Ongoing Review and Updating Recommendations
Businesses change over time, so the firm recommends periodic reviews of operating agreements and bylaws to address ownership changes, regulatory updates, or strategic shifts. The firm provides guidance on when amendments are appropriate and helps prepare amendments or restatements when necessary. Regular reviews help ensure governance documents remain aligned with the company’s operations and continue to serve the owners’ objectives effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions About Operating Agreements and Bylaws
What is the difference between an operating agreement and corporate bylaws?
An operating agreement governs the internal affairs of an LLC and sets out member rights, management structure, distributions, and transfer rules, while corporate bylaws establish the processes for a corporation’s board of directors, officers, and shareholders. Each document translates statutory rules into practical procedures tailored to the company’s needs. While state statutes provide default rules, these governing documents allow owners to override or clarify defaults where the law permits, helping avoid uncertainty in management and ownership matters. Drafting either type of document should reflect how the company actually operates and the owners’ expectations. Clear definitions, voting rules, and procedures for major transactions help prevent disputes and ensure consistent application of governance rules across different scenarios. Adopting tailored documents is a practical step to protect business continuity and owner relationships.
Do I need an operating agreement or bylaws if I already registered my company with the state?
State registration establishes the company’s legal existence but does not replace the need for internal governance documents. Filing with the state creates the entity, while operating agreements or bylaws provide the rules for internal management, ownership transfers, and dispute resolution. Without these documents, the company is subject to default statutory rules that may not align with the owners’ intentions, which can lead to unforeseen problems when disagreements arise. Having written governance documents is especially important when multiple owners are involved, when outside investors participate, or when succession planning is a concern. Documents tailored to the company’s needs ensure that owners’ expectations are recorded and that processes are in place to handle both routine matters and extraordinary events.
Can operating agreements and bylaws be changed after they are adopted?
Yes, operating agreements and bylaws can be amended after adoption, typically according to amendment procedures set out within the documents themselves. Amendments usually require a specified approval threshold, such as a majority or supermajority vote, depending on the importance of the change. Proper amendment procedures help ensure that modifications reflect the consent of the required owners or shareholders and preserve the document’s enforceability. When amending documents, it is important to follow adoption and recordkeeping steps such as documenting approval in meeting minutes and updating official copies. Some changes may also require coordination with third parties, such as lenders or investors, and careful drafting can minimize the need for repeated amendments in the future.
What should I include to handle disputes between owners?
Effective dispute provisions commonly include negotiation and mediation steps followed by arbitration if mediation fails, providing a structured and less public path to resolution. Clear escalation procedures reduce the likelihood of costly and disruptive litigation while allowing parties to resolve disputes efficiently. Including decision-making tie-breakers or appointment mechanisms for neutral decision-makers can also help when owners are deadlocked on important issues. Other preventative measures include well-defined roles and responsibilities and transparent financial reporting requirements. These proactive governance features limit misunderstandings and provide objective criteria for resolving disagreements, preserving relationships and business operations while conflicts are addressed.
How do buy-sell provisions protect a business?
Buy-sell provisions set a process for valuing and transferring ownership interests when an owner wishes to exit or is forced to leave due to events like death, disability, or retirement. These provisions often include valuation methods, timelines for offers and acceptances, and rights of first refusal for remaining owners. By defining a predictable exit path, buy-sell clauses help prevent ownership disputes and the introduction of unwanted third-party owners. Well-drafted buy-sell agreements also protect family-owned businesses by providing fair compensation to departing owners and ensuring continuity for the business. Including clear funding mechanisms and valuation approaches helps minimize disagreements about price and timing when transfers are triggered.
What voting thresholds are recommended for major decisions?
Voting thresholds should match the importance of the decision at hand: routine operational matters often require a simple majority, while major structural changes like mergers, sales, or amendments to governing documents may require a supermajority or unanimous consent. Choosing appropriate thresholds helps balance efficient management with safeguards against unwanted major changes by a slim majority. Clear differentiation between ordinary and extraordinary decisions enhances predictability and fairness in governance. The operating agreement or bylaws should also specify quorum requirements for meetings, proxy voting rules, and procedures for written consent. These details ensure votes are valid and reflect genuine participation by owners or shareholders, preventing procedural disputes from undermining important decisions.
How can we handle ownership transfers to family members?
Transferring ownership to family members can be handled through tailored transfer restrictions and buy-sell provisions that address valuation, timing, and management involvement. Documents can include phased transfers or options that allow family members to assume ownership over time while preserving business stability. Clear procedures reduce the potential for family conflicts and protect minority owners’ rights during transitional events. It is also important to consider tax and estate planning implications when transferring ownership within a family. Coordinating governance documents with advisors ensures transfers are structured to meet family objectives while maintaining operational continuity and compliance with Tennessee law.
Are there special considerations for single-member LLCs?
Single-member LLCs still benefit from written operating agreements to document ownership, management authority, and procedures for adding members in the future. While governance may be simpler, a written agreement clarifies business operations, supports limited liability protections, and provides successors with guidance in the event of the owner’s incapacity or death. This reduces uncertainty and eases transactions if new owners are added later. Even with a single owner, it is advisable to set out clear recordkeeping, formal meeting, and transfer procedures so the business maintains proper corporate formalities and can demonstrate orderly governance if questioned by lenders or third parties.
Will lenders or investors require specific governance provisions?
Lenders and investors commonly require specific governance provisions to protect their interests, such as restrictions on distributions, approval requirements for incurring debt, and notice rights for significant transactions. Investors may also request certain information rights, protective covenants, or approval thresholds to ensure their capital is managed prudently. Anticipating these requirements can make financing easier and avoid later conflicts during negotiations with outside parties. Drafting governance with potential investor or lender expectations in mind helps streamline due diligence and makes the business more attractive for capital. Clear governance documents demonstrate that owners have organized decision-making processes and safeguards in place, which supports confidence from external stakeholders.
How often should governance documents be reviewed and updated?
Governance documents should be reviewed periodically, typically every few years or when significant events occur such as ownership changes, capital raises, or strategic shifts. Regular reviews ensure that the operating agreement or bylaws continue to reflect the company’s structure and objectives and remain compliant with law and best practices. Updating documents proactively reduces the need for emergency amendments when unexpected issues arise. Businesses should also revisit governance when preparing for transactions like sales or financing, or when family or succession planning becomes relevant. Periodic reviews help ensure that the governance framework supports the company’s current reality and future plans.