Comprehensive Guide to Eminent Domain and Condemnation in Eagleton Village
Eminent domain and condemnation matters can upend property plans and community expectations in Eagleton Village. When a government entity or utility seeks to acquire private property for public use, property owners face complex legal, procedural, and valuation issues. Understanding your rights, the timeline, and the options available for challenging a taking or securing fair compensation is essential. This guide introduces core concepts and practical steps homeowners and landowners in Eagleton Village can take to protect their interests and pursue the maximum lawful recovery allowed under Tennessee law.
If your property is affected by a proposed taking, it is important to act deliberately and document everything related to the potential acquisition. Municipal plans, survey notices, appraisal reports, and communications from acquiring authorities all shape outcomes. Knowing when to negotiate, when to seek independent valuation, and how to preserve legal claims can make a meaningful difference in compensation and future use of the land. This introduction frames the issues you are likely to face and outlines considerations tailored to the local context of Eagleton Village and Blount County.
Why Legal Assistance Matters in Eminent Domain Matters
Working through an eminent domain matter helps property owners ensure that procedural protections are observed and that compensation reflects the full value of what is being taken. Legal support can clarify whether a proposed taking qualifies as public use, identify claims for severance and consequential damages, and help present evidence challenging flawed valuations. In many cases, intervention during negotiations or litigation secures more favorable terms than accepting an initial offer. For Eagleton Village residents, careful legal review preserves development potential or business continuity and can recover relocation costs and other losses tied to the taking.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Property Takings
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves Tennessee property owners with a practical, client-centered approach to eminent domain and condemnation matters. The firm focuses on careful document review, independent valuation, and clear communication to help clients understand their rights and options. For residents of Eagleton Village, the firm draws on knowledge of local practices and state statutes to develop negotiation strategies or prepare court filings when necessary. The team prioritizes preserving client goals, whether that means maximizing compensation, protecting land use rights, or securing adequate relocation outcomes.
Understanding Eminent Domain and Condemnation in Tennessee
Eminent domain is the legal power that allows public authorities to acquire private property for projects deemed to serve a public need, subject to the requirement of just compensation. Condemnation is the process by which an authority exercises that power and transfers title. In Tennessee, statutory procedures and constitutional protections govern notice, appraisal, negotiation, and potentially litigation. Property owners should understand the sequence from initial notice to final award, the role of appraisals, and the potential for negotiating acquisition terms or challenging the validity or scope of the taking.
The practical impact of a taking extends beyond the parcel itself. Owners may face partial takings, where only part of a property is acquired, creating issues of severance damages and access changes. There may also be temporary takings for construction easements, leading to claims for temporary loss of use and restoration. Understanding the types of compensation available, including market value, damages for diminished use, and costs tied to relocation or business interruption, helps property owners assess settlement offers and plan a response that protects long-term interests.
Key Definitions: What Eminent Domain and Condemnation Mean
Eminent domain refers to the authority of a governmental body or authorized entity to obtain private property for public purposes, provided the owner receives just compensation. Condemnation is the formal legal mechanism used to carry out that authority and resolve compensation disputes. These concepts include distinctions between full and partial takings, temporary versus permanent acquisitions, and the difference between purchase by agreement and involuntary acquisition by court proceedings. Knowing these definitions helps owners recognize when rights are implicated and what remedial steps are available.
Core Elements and Typical Procedural Steps
A typical condemnation process includes initial project planning by the acquiring authority, notice to affected landowners, appraisal and offer, negotiation, and, if necessary, a condemnation lawsuit to resolve title and compensation. Property owners should expect to receive formal notices, valuation reports, and opportunities to respond. Key tasks include preserving evidence of property value, documenting any business or use losses, and obtaining independent assessments when offers appear low. Understanding filing deadlines and procedural requirements is essential to safeguard rights at each stage.
Key Terms and Glossary for Property Takings
This glossary covers frequent terms encountered in takings and condemnation matters, including market value, fair market value, severance damages, temporary inverse condemnation, just compensation, and public use. These terms shape how compensation is calculated and how disputes are framed. Familiarity with this vocabulary makes it easier to interpret notices, appraisal reports, and legal filings, and provides a foundation for meaningful discussions with the acquiring authority or for preparing litigation strategies when disputes arise.
Just Compensation
Just compensation is the amount the law requires the acquiring authority to pay a property owner when private property is taken for public use. It generally reflects the fair market value of the property at the time of the taking, plus any additional damages caused by a partial taking or loss of access. Calculating just compensation may also consider relocation expenses, loss of business goodwill, and costs to restore remaining property. Property owners should ensure offers reflect these components and should consider independent appraisal to verify the correctness of the proposed amount.
Severance Damages
Severance damages compensate the owner for the loss in value to the portion of the property that remains after a partial taking. When a taking divides or alters the utility of a parcel, the remaining land may be less valuable or harder to use. These damages address reductions in marketability, diminished access, loss of view, or increased development costs. Establishing severance damages involves comparative valuation before and after the taking and may require expert appraisals, site plans, and evidence showing how the remainder is impacted by the acquisition.
Public Use
Public use refers to the legally permissible purpose for which an authority may take private property. Typical public uses include roads, utilities, schools, and parks, but interpretations can vary. Courts examine whether the acquiring entity’s stated purpose falls within authorized types of public use and whether the taking is reasonably related to that purpose. Property owners may challenge a taking if they can demonstrate the proposed use does not meet statutory or constitutional requirements, or if the scope of the taking appears excessive for the stated purpose.
Temporary Taking and Possession
A temporary taking occurs when an authority occupies or uses private property for a limited time, such as for construction staging or utility work. These temporary takings can trigger compensation for loss of use, restoration costs, and any damages incurred during the period of possession. Proper documentation of the condition of the property before, during, and after the temporary taking helps support claims for restoration and compensation. Agreements often specify the scope and duration of temporary uses and responsibilities for return to pre-taking condition.
Comparing Legal Options for Property Owners
Property owners facing a taking typically consider negotiation with the acquiring authority, independent appraisal and valuation review, administrative remedies, or litigation to resolve disputes over compensation or the validity of the taking. Negotiation can be efficient when both sides are reasonable, while litigation is often needed when offers understate damages or when the scope of the taking is contested. Each option has trade-offs regarding time, cost, and likely outcomes. Tailoring a strategy to the specifics of the parcel, potential damages, and client objectives often yields the best results.
When a Narrow, Negotiation-Focused Approach May Be Sufficient:
Clear Market Valuation and Cooperative Authority
A negotiation-focused approach can be appropriate when the acquiring authority presents an offer that aligns with independent market indicators and the scope of the taking is straightforward. If appraisal data and comparable sales support the offered amount and the government entity is willing to discuss adjustments for documented damages, pursuing settlement through negotiation may preserve resources and reduce delay. In these situations, careful review of valuation methods and targeted requests for compensation adjustments can resolve matters without protracted dispute resolution.
Minimal Impact to Remaining Property
When a taking has limited or no adverse effect on the remainder of the property, and the owner’s future plans are not substantially altered, a focused settlement effort may suffice. If the parcel left after acquisition remains functional and retainable value is preserved, pursuing modest negotiations for the taking value and any minor severance claims may be efficient. Owners should still document potential losses and confirm that offers reflect any temporary use or restoration obligations before accepting a final settlement.
When a Broader Legal Response Is Advisable:
Complex Valuation or Significant Severance Issues
A comprehensive legal response is advisable when valuation is complex, the property has unique development potential, or partial takings create significant severance damages. Such situations often require independent appraisals, economic analyses, and coordinated evidentiary preparation to quantify losses fully. A more expansive approach includes negotiating for interim remedies, documenting business impacts, and, if necessary, litigating to achieve compensation that reflects the full legal measure of damages and to protect future use and value of the remaining property.
Questionable Public Use or Procedural Irregularities
A broader legal strategy may be necessary if the authority’s stated public use is uncertain or if procedural faults in the condemnation process are evident. Challenging the legitimacy of a taking requires careful legal research, fact development, and potentially injunctions or declaratory relief to halt an improper acquisition. Addressing procedural defects early preserves rights and can shift negotiation leverage, particularly where notice, appraisal methodology, or authority overreach raise legitimate legal concerns requiring formal dispute resolution.
Advantages of a Full-Scope Approach to Takings
A comprehensive approach seeks to identify all categories of recoverable loss, including market value, severance damages, temporary possession compensation, relocation costs, and business interruption where applicable. Thorough investigation and evidence gathering strengthen negotiating positions and support litigation when necessary. For Eagleton Village property owners, this approach helps ensure that offers are not narrowly framed and that the compensation reflects both present and foreseeable impacts of the taking on the property’s value and utility.
Comprehensive representation also monitors timing, filing deadlines, and procedural safeguards to prevent forfeiture of claims. Attention to detail during appraisal review and damage accounting reduces the risk of underpayment and preserves claims for consequential losses. Additionally, a broad approach can address long-term development plans by seeking remedies that maintain or compensate for lost future potential, rather than focusing solely on immediate sale value. This strategic perspective often yields stronger settlements and more predictable outcomes.
Maximizing Recoverable Damages
By thoroughly identifying all compensable elements, a comprehensive strategy increases the likelihood of capturing damages that an initial offer may overlook. This includes accounting for severance, loss of access, diminished marketability, and relocation expenses. For property owners in Eagleton Village who may have development plans or businesses tied to their parcels, asserting these claims can materially increase recoveries. Rigorous appraisal review and supplemental evidence support requests for additional compensation beyond the baseline market value calculation.
Protecting Long-Term Property Interests
A wide-ranging approach safeguards not only immediate compensation but also the owner’s longer term interests, such as remaining development rights, zoning impacts, and access to utilities. Addressing residual rights and potential future limitations in settlement negotiations helps prevent unanticipated losses after the taking. This attention to future implications is especially important when partial takings alter the usability of land or when infrastructure projects change traffic patterns and neighborhood character, creating downstream economic effects that should be recognized in compensation.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Eminent domain attorney Eagleton Village
- condemnation law Tennessee
- property valuation condemnation
- just compensation Tennessee
- severance damages Eagleton Village
- temporary takings compensation
- condemnation negotiation tips
- land acquisition disputes Blount County
- Jay Johnson Law Firm eminent domain
Practical Tips for Property Owners Facing a Taking
Document Property Condition and Uses
Before or during any taking, create a thorough record of how the property is used and its condition. Photographs, video, maintenance records, tenant leases, business revenue summaries, and plans for future development all support valuation and damage claims. Detailed documentation helps establish baseline value and shows how a taking alters utility or income potential. Maintain copies of all communications from the acquiring authority, appraisal reports, and notices of intent, as these documents will be essential when evaluating any offer and preparing supporting evidence for negotiation or litigation.
Obtain Independent Valuation When Offers Appear Low
Protect Deadlines and Procedural Rights
Adherence to statutory deadlines and administrative procedures is essential to preserve claims and avoid unintended forfeiture. Respond promptly to notices, file required objections within time limits, and keep careful records of service and receipt of documents. If there are procedural irregularities, addressing them early may alter the course of negotiations or provide grounds to suspend actions pending resolution. Proactive management of timelines and filings strengthens a property owner’s position and helps ensure full consideration of all losses during settlement talks.
Why Property Owners in Eagleton Village Should Consider Legal Assistance
Property takings can affect personal residences, rental holdings, and commercial enterprises alike, and the consequences extend beyond a single payment. Legal assistance helps identify all recoverable losses and negotiates for terms that reflect the true impact of the acquisition. For owners with development plans, significant improvements, or business operations on site, legal review protects against undervaluation and seeks compensation for losses that might otherwise be missed. Engaging counsel early gives owners more time to gather evidence and shape outcomes through negotiation or, if needed, litigation.
Additionally, a legal representative monitors procedural compliance by the acquiring authority and ensures that rights guaranteed under Tennessee law are respected. Whether addressing notice deficiencies, contesting scope, or pursuing higher compensation, legal involvement frequently improves settlement quality and timeliness. For many owners in Eagleton Village, the assistance adds clarity during an otherwise confusing process and can reduce stress by managing communications, conducting valuations, and advocating for fair resolution on behalf of the property owner.
Common Situations That Lead to Condemnation or Acquisition
Typical circumstances include public infrastructure projects such as road widening, utility upgrades, drainage improvements, or public facility construction. Private developments with eminent domain authority, such as utility companies or rail projects, can also result in takings. Additionally, temporary construction easements and right-of-way needs often require temporary possession of private property. Whenever public projects intersect with private parcels, owners should evaluate notices carefully and consider legal review to determine the full scope of rights and the appropriate response to proposed acquisitions.
Public Road or Highway Expansion
Road or highway projects frequently require acquisition of portions of private parcels for right-of-way, shoulder widening, or access improvements. These partial takings can reduce usable acreage, alter access points, and impose new setbacks, sometimes diminishing the remainder’s value. Owners impacted by such projects should document current access and use, retain valuation evidence reflecting the highest and best use absent the taking, and evaluate offers for compensation and necessary relocation or mitigation measures to address the impact of diminished functionality after acquisition.
Utility or Infrastructure Upgrades
Utility projects, including buried pipelines, electrical lines, and sewer or water expansions, may require either temporary or permanent easements across private land. Temporary occupations for construction can produce cleanup and restoration claims, while permanent easements affect future use and development. Owners should review easement language carefully, seek compensation for loss of use and any damage, and confirm responsibilities for restoration and long-term access. Ensuring fair terms can prevent ongoing interference with property rights and uses.
Public Facility Construction or Redevelopment
Construction of schools, parks, transit facilities, or other public amenities may require acquiring private property in full or in part. These projects can have broader community impacts and may change neighborhood dynamics. Owners should consider both direct compensation and broader impacts on property value, including potential shifts in market demand and long-term access issues. Evaluating offers in the context of both present market value and future implications ensures a complete approach to seeking fair recovery for the taking.
Local Legal Support for Eagleton Village Property Owners
Jay Johnson Law Firm provides representation for owners in Eagleton Village and nearby Blount County communities facing property acquisition. We review notices, appraisals, and negotiation offers, help document damages, and advise on procedural rights under Tennessee law. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, targeted valuation review, and persistent advocacy to secure appropriate compensation. Owners receive practical guidance on next steps, whether that means negotiating with the acquiring authority or preparing for litigation to protect long-term property value and use.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Your Eminent Domain Matter
Clients turn to Jay Johnson Law Firm because the firm focuses on property law matters with attention to valuation, procedural compliance, and client priorities. We work to ensure offers reflect all recoverable losses and that owners understand the legal options available in Tennessee. Our practice involves careful document analysis, collaboration with valuation professionals where needed, and assertive negotiation on behalf of property owners to achieve fair compensation and favorable settlement terms that address both immediate and future impacts.
The firm’s local familiarity helps anticipate common issues that arise in Blount County and Eagleton Village, such as municipal procedures and likely project timelines. That local perspective informs strategy, from early evidence gathering through final settlement or trial. Clients benefit from clear explanations of the process, regular updates, and plans that align with personal objectives, whether that involves preserving remaining property use or securing compensation that reflects lost value and costs associated with the taking.
Communication and responsiveness are central to how the firm works with property owners. We prioritize returning calls, explaining legal options in plain language, and coordinating with appraisers or other professionals to build a persuasive claim. Our goal is to help clients make informed decisions about settlement offers or further action, providing guidance that balances cost, risk, and the desired outcome for the property owner in Eagleton Village or nearby communities.
Contact Jay Johnson Law Firm to Discuss Your Property Taking
How We Handle Eminent Domain and Condemnation Cases
Our process begins with an initial review of notices, offers, and appraisal materials to determine the scope of the taking and potential categories of loss. We then gather necessary documentation, coordinate independent valuation where appropriate, and develop a negotiation strategy tailored to the client’s goals. If a settlement cannot be reached, we prepare the case for litigation including evidence, witness statements, and valuation reports. Throughout, we keep clients informed of timelines, legal options, and likely outcomes so they can make informed choices.
Step One: Case Intake and Document Review
The initial phase focuses on collecting and reviewing all documents related to the proposed taking, including notices, appraisal reports, property records, and communications from the acquiring authority. We also interview the owner to understand the property’s use, development plans, and any business impacts. This documentation forms the factual basis for valuation analysis, helps identify potential additional claims, and clarifies whether immediate tactical steps are necessary to preserve rights or halt premature actions by the authority.
Gathering Evidence and Establishing Baseline Value
We compile evidence such as photographs, surveys, tax records, leases, and historical use documentation to establish the property’s condition and highest and best use before the taking. This factual record supports independent appraisal work and helps identify items that might increase compensation, such as recent improvements or planned developments. Establishing a clear baseline is essential for comparing pre-taking and post-taking values and for substantiating claims for severance or consequential damages.
Reviewing Appraisals and Offers
The firm reviews any appraisals provided by the acquiring authority to assess methodology, comparable sales selection, and assumptions that affect value. Where appropriate, we obtain independent appraisals to test the reasonableness of offers. This review identifies gaps or errors and informs negotiation strategies aimed at obtaining a higher, more accurate valuation. Careful appraisal analysis increases the likelihood of securing a settlement that appropriately compensates for both the taken portion and impacts to the remainder.
Step Two: Negotiation and Valuation Dispute Resolution
After initial review and evidence gathering, we engage the acquiring authority to seek a resolution through negotiation. This phase involves presenting valuation evidence, requesting adjustments for severance and other damages, and exploring non-monetary terms where relevant. Effective negotiation can resolve many matters without the time and expense of litigation, but we prepare to escalate if offers remain inadequate. Clear, evidence-based demands and readiness to litigate when needed strengthen the owner’s bargaining position.
Presenting Independent Valuation and Damage Claims
We present independent valuation reports and documented damage claims to the acquiring authority to support requests for fair compensation. This presentation includes a detailed explanation of comparables, adjustments, and the impact of partial takings or temporary possession. We also supply documentation for ancillary losses such as relocation costs or business disruption when applicable, creating a comprehensive claim packet that the authority must consider during settlement discussions.
Negotiating Terms and Securing Remedial Provisions
Negotiation can include discussions about timing of payment, responsibilities for restoration after temporary occupation, and potential mitigation measures to reduce impacts. When property rights beyond payment are at stake, we explore terms that protect access, future use, and development rights. Securing remedial provisions in a settlement can prevent unforeseen losses after the taking and provide assurances about restoration or mitigation obligations the acquiring authority must meet.
Step Three: Litigation and Compensation Trials
If negotiation fails to produce a fair outcome, we prepare condemnation litigation to resolve title and compensation disputes. Litigation involves filing appropriate claims, coordinating expert testimony on valuation, conducting discovery, and presenting evidence at trial. Court proceedings give property owners an adjudicative forum to contest the amount offered and to seek a judicial determination of fair compensation under Tennessee law. The litigation phase prioritizes thorough preparation to present a persuasive valuation case and protect client interests.
Preparing the Case for Court
Preparation involves securing appraisal experts, creating demonstrative evidence, and assembling documentary support showing pre-taking value and post-taking impacts. We also identify witness testimony that supports claims for severance, temporary loss, or business damages. Strong pretrial preparation often influences settlement offers and positions the owner well for trial if necessary. The goal is to ensure claims are presented methodically and persuasively to achieve a fair judicial outcome.
Trial Presentation and Post-Trial Matters
At trial, valuation experts explain methodologies and comparables to support the owner’s compensation claim while witnesses corroborate loss of use or business impacts. Following a judgment, the firm handles post-trial motions and settlement of awarded sums, ensuring that payment, title transfer, and restoration obligations are completed as ordered. Managing these final steps ensures the owner receives full benefit of a favorable decision and that practical concerns about property restoration and payment timing are addressed.
Frequently Asked Questions About Eminent Domain and Condemnation
What is the first step if I receive a notice of intent to take my property?
The first practical step after receiving a notice of intent is to preserve all related documents and communications and to begin compiling a record of the property’s condition and uses. Photographs, recent tax and deed records, leases, and maintenance receipts provide important facts that support valuation. It is also wise to carefully read the notice to determine timelines and whether any immediate action or responses are required under Tennessee procedure.After preservation of records, consult with counsel to evaluate the acquiring authority’s offer and to determine whether independent valuation or negotiation is appropriate. Early legal review clarifies procedural rights, helps identify additional recoverable damages, and establishes the best path forward given the owner’s objectives and the specifics of the taking.
How is compensation calculated in a condemnation case?
Compensation in a condemnation proceeding generally reflects the fair market value of the property at the time of the taking, which is what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller in an open market. Appraisers consider comparable sales, highest and best use, and adjustments for condition or unique characteristics of the parcel. Market value serves as the baseline for most compensation calculations.Beyond base market value, owners may be entitled to severance damages for loss of value to remaining property, compensation for temporary takings, costs to restore or repair, and relocation or business interruption costs when applicable. Each category requires supporting evidence, and precise outcomes depend on statutory law and case precedents in Tennessee.
Can I challenge the public use or necessity of the taking?
Yes, property owners can challenge whether a taking genuinely qualifies as a public use or whether the scope of the taking is necessary. Courts review whether the acquiring authority has a legitimate public purpose and whether the taking is reasonably related to that purpose. Procedural errors or overbroad acquisitions may also be grounds to contest the taking.Challenging public use typically involves legal research and factual development to demonstrate a lack of legitimate purpose or excessive scope. Timely objection and strategic use of injunctions or declaratory relief may be needed to prevent irreversible steps by the acquiring authority while the dispute is resolved.
What types of damages can I recover besides the purchase price?
In addition to the purchase price for the land taken, owners may recover severance damages for the remainder, compensation for temporary takings and loss of use, relocation expenses, and certain business losses where justified. The full range of recoverable losses depends on the nature of the property and the impact of the taking on its use and value.Proving these additional damages often requires documentation and expert testimony to quantify the loss. Keeping accurate records of revenues, expenses, and plans for the property helps substantiate claims for consequential losses beyond straightforward market value calculations.
Do I have to accept the acquiring authority’s initial offer?
No, you are not required to accept the acquiring authority’s initial offer. Initial offers are often starting points, and owners have the right to seek additional compensation through negotiation or litigation. Evaluating the offer against independent valuation and documented impacts helps determine whether acceptance is appropriate.Before accepting any offer, owners should confirm that it addresses all categories of loss and that any release or settlement language does not surrender additional claims. Legal review of settlement documents ensures that owners are fully informed about the implications of acceptance and that compensation is adequate.
How long does the condemnation process usually take?
Timing varies widely depending on whether the matter is resolved by negotiation or requires litigation. Some negotiated settlements conclude in a matter of weeks or months, while contested condemnations that proceed to trial and appeals can take a year or more. Complexity of valuation, number of parties, and court schedules all influence the timeline.Owners should prepare for potential delays but also use that time to gather evidence and valuation support. Prompt documentation and strategic engagement early in the process improve the chances of timely and favorable resolution without unnecessary procedural setbacks.
Will I need an independent appraisal?
An independent appraisal is often advisable, particularly when the acquiring authority’s valuation appears low or when the property has unique characteristics. An independent appraisal provides a benchmark for negotiation and can highlight methodological differences that affect value assessments.Using a qualified valuation professional familiar with local markets and condemnation valuation standards helps strengthen claims for additional compensation. Independent appraisal reports, combined with documentary support, create persuasive evidence in both negotiations and court proceedings.
What happens if only part of my property is taken?
When only part of a property is taken, the owner may claim severance damages for the loss in value to the remaining property. The remainder may suffer reduced access, altered contours, or other impacts that diminish its marketability or development potential. Properly quantifying these effects is essential to securing fair compensation.Assessing severance often involves before-and-after valuation comparisons and evidence such as site plans, development feasibility studies, and expert testimony. Addressing potential mitigation measures and obtaining terms to preserve access or easements may also form part of a comprehensive settlement strategy.
Can temporary construction use be compensated?
Temporary use of property for construction or staging commonly generates claims for compensation for loss of use, physical damage, and costs to restore the site after occupation. The terms of the temporary taking, including duration and scope, determine the nature and amount of recoverable compensation. Owners should document the condition of the property before, during, and after the temporary use to support restoration claims.Agreements that specify restoration obligations and timelines help reduce disputes over condition and responsibility. When temporary occupation causes business interruption or other consequential losses, owners should collect records and receipts that demonstrate the extent of those damages to include them in compensation demands.
How do relocation costs factor into compensation?
Relocation costs may be recoverable when a taking forces an owner or tenant to move or alters the use of a property in a way that necessitates relocation. These costs can include moving expenses, temporary housing, and reasonable expenses associated with obtaining a replacement location. Documentation of actual costs supports claims for reimbursement.For businesses, relocation damages can also include costs to move operations, reestablish facilities, and lost income during the transition. Showing detailed invoices, contracts, and financial records helps establish the extent of relocation-related losses and supports requests for appropriate compensation from the acquiring authority.