A Practical Guide to Guardianship and Conservatorship in Rocky Top
This page explains how guardianship and conservatorship laws apply to families and individuals in Rocky Top and the surrounding areas of Anderson County, Tennessee. It outlines the differences between guardianship, which typically concerns personal decisions and day to day care, and conservatorship, which addresses financial and property management. You will find clear information about common scenarios that lead families to explore these options, the legal steps involved, and the kinds of documentation that are often needed. If you are considering these legal tools, this guide aims to give practical context and next steps so you can make informed decisions.
When someone cannot manage personal care or finances, families often face urgent decisions that affect safety, housing, medical care, and assets. This guide breaks down the roles that a guardian or conservator may be asked to perform and describes the responsibilities and reporting requirements that state law can impose. You will also find guidance on alternatives to full guardianship or conservatorship, such as limited powers or powers of attorney, and how those options may fit different situations. Our goal is to equip you with enough information to start a conversation and plan a reasonable next step for your loved one in Rocky Top.
Why Guardianship and Conservatorship Matter for Families in Rocky Top
Guardianship and conservatorship can provide a legal structure for protecting vulnerable adults and managing assets when a person cannot do so themselves. The benefits include establishing a recognized decision maker who can arrange medical care, make housing decisions, and manage finances according to court supervision and state law. These arrangements also create safeguards like required reporting to the court and limits on how funds are spent. Families often find that having a court appointed role reduces conflict and clarifies responsibilities, allowing relatives to focus on care and quality of life rather than ongoing disputes about bills, medical decisions, or living arrangements.
About Jay Johnson Law Firm and Our Approach to Guardianship Matters
Jay Johnson Law Firm serves Hendersonville and communities across Tennessee, including Rocky Top, with a focus on estate planning and probate related matters like guardianship and conservatorship. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical planning, and careful attention to procedural requirements under Tennessee law. We discuss options with families, explain likely timelines, and outline the duties associated with guardians and conservators. The firm aims to reduce stress for loved ones by helping them prepare necessary paperwork, represent them in hearings if needed, and provide ongoing guidance about reporting and administration matters once a court order is in place.
Guardianship and conservatorship are legal mechanisms that allow a court to authorize someone to make personal and financial decisions on behalf of an adult who cannot manage on their own. Tennessee law sets out specific standards and procedures for finding incapacity and appointing a guardian or conservator. The process typically begins with a petition to the probate court and may involve medical evaluations, notice to interested parties, and a hearing. Courts balance respect for individual autonomy with the need to protect vulnerable people, and they may tailor orders to limit powers to only what is necessary for the person’s well being and financial security.
Before pursuing guardianship or conservatorship, families should carefully consider alternatives that can preserve autonomy while addressing practical needs. Durable powers of attorney, health care directives, and supported decision making agreements can often avoid court involvement if executed while the person still has capacity. When court action is necessary, the goal is to obtain an order that is proportionate to the person’s needs and includes oversight measures such as periodic reporting to the court. Understanding these options helps families choose the least intrusive path that still protects safety and financial stability.
Defining Guardianship and Conservatorship: Roles and Responsibilities
A guardian is typically responsible for personal decisions, including housing, medical care, daily living arrangements, and sometimes education and social needs. A conservator, on the other hand, manages the person’s financial affairs, paying bills, managing investments, and protecting assets. In Tennessee, courts may appoint one person to handle both roles or separate them between different individuals. Both positions carry legal duties and require acting in the best interest of the person under the court’s supervision. The exact scope of authority is defined in the court order and can be limited to specific matters or broad in scope depending on the facts of the case.
Key Elements and the Typical Court Process
The guardianship and conservatorship process usually begins with a petition filed in probate court, supported by medical or psychological evidence of incapacity. Notice must be provided to the proposed ward and other interested parties, who have the right to attend hearings and present their views. Courts consider less restrictive alternatives and may order evaluations before deciding. If an appointment is made, the guardian or conservator must file inventories, accountings, and reports as required by Tennessee law. Courts retain oversight authority and can modify or terminate the appointment if circumstances change, ensuring ongoing protection without unnecessary limitation of rights.
Key Terms and Glossary for Guardianship and Conservatorship
This glossary defines common terms used in guardianship and conservatorship cases so families can better understand filings, court orders, and legal duties. Understanding the terminology helps when reviewing petitions, affidavits, and court orders. Key terms include ward, petitioner, guardian ad litem, conservator, durable power of attorney, incapacity, and inventory. Familiarity with these words makes it easier to follow the process, communicate effectively with the court and interested parties, and meet reporting obligations. Clear definitions reduce confusion and help families make informed choices about planning and court options in their local community.
Ward
A ward is an adult for whom the court has appointed a guardian or conservator due to incapacity. Being a ward means certain decisions about personal care or finances are made by the person appointed by the court, subject to the terms of the court order. The court aims to preserve as much of the ward’s autonomy as possible while ensuring safety and financial protection. The status of ward can change if the person regains capacity or if the court modifies the appointment. Families should know that the court’s decisions prioritize the ward’s well being and rights within the limits of state law.
Conservator
A conservator is an individual appointed by the court to manage the financial affairs of a person deemed unable to do so themselves. Responsibilities may include paying bills, managing bank accounts, handling taxes, and making investment decisions in the ward’s best interests. Conservators must follow reporting requirements set by the court, including inventories and periodic accountings. Courts may limit a conservator’s powers and require bond or other protections to guard against misuse of funds. The role is intended to protect financial assets while ensuring they are used for the ward’s care and benefit.
Guardian
A guardian is someone the court appoints to make personal and healthcare decisions for an adult who lacks capacity to make those choices safely. Duties often include arranging medical care, deciding on residential placement, managing daily care plans, and coordinating services. Guardians must act in the best interest of the person and may be required to report to the court periodically. The scope of authority is defined by the court order and can be tailored to address only specific decisions while preserving other rights. Guardianship aims to balance care needs with respect for the individual’s remaining abilities.
Limited Guardianship and Conservatorship
A limited appointment grants decision making authority only over certain specified areas rather than broad authority over all personal or financial matters. Limited guardianship or conservatorship allows the court to tailor relief to the person’s actual needs, preserving independence where possible. For example, a court might assign a guardian to handle medical decisions while leaving other daily routines to the person. Similarly, a conservator might be authorized only to manage large financial transactions while smaller daily expenditures remain under the ward’s control. Limited orders can be modified as circumstances change.
Comparing Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Alternatives
Choosing between guardianship, conservatorship, and less formal tools depends on the individual’s capacity, safety concerns, and family dynamics. Powers of attorney and health care directives are useful when a person still has capacity to sign documents and wants to avoid court involvement. Guardianship and conservatorship provide court supervised authority when incapacity is present and when other tools are impossible or insufficient. Each option has trade offs: formal court orders offer oversight and enforceable authority, while private powers can be quicker and less intrusive. Evaluating the person’s needs, potential conflicts, and long term goals helps select the best path.
When a Limited Approach May Be Appropriate:
Person Retains Some Decision Making Capacity
A limited approach is often appropriate when the person retains meaningful capacity for certain decisions but needs help in other areas. For example, someone may still be able to decide daily routines and socialize independently but require assistance managing retirement accounts or handling large financial transactions. In such situations, appointing a conservator with narrowly defined powers or relying on a targeted durable power of attorney can preserve the person’s dignity and independence while addressing specific vulnerabilities. The goal is to provide targeted support where needed and avoid removing rights that remain intact.
Presence of Clear, Trustworthy Private Arrangements
When there are already clear written instructions, trusted family members willing to act, and no evidence of financial exploitation or immediate danger, a limited approach can work well. Durable financial powers of attorney and health care directives prepared while the person has capacity allow private agents to act without court intervention. These documents can be tailored to grant powers only when certain conditions are met, reducing the need for formal guardianship or conservatorship. Courts may favor less intrusive alternatives when they adequately protect the individual and their resources.
When a Comprehensive Court Proceeding Is Necessary:
Suspected Incapacity and No Prior Planning
A full guardianship or conservatorship proceeding is often necessary if a person shows signs of incapacity and has not executed advance planning documents such as powers of attorney. When immediate decisions are needed for medical care, placement, or managing finances and no authorized agent exists, the court can appoint someone to protect the person’s well being. This comprehensive process provides legal authority that third parties such as banks and medical providers will recognize, enabling necessary actions that private documents could not authorize in the absence of capacity.
Conflict Among Family Members or Risk of Financial Harm
If family members disagree about care or if there is suspicion of financial mismanagement, a court supervised process may be the safest option. The probate court can investigate, appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the person’s interests, and issue orders that protect assets while ensuring appropriate care. Court oversight reduces the risk of improper transactions and creates an enforceable mechanism for resolving disputes. In these situations, a comprehensive proceeding establishes clear authority and accountability for those responsible for decisions affecting the person.
Benefits of a Court Supervised Approach
A court supervised guardianship or conservatorship offers formal oversight that can be reassuring when significant assets or serious medical needs are involved. Court orders provide clear authority recognized by banks, health care providers, and government agencies. Required inventories and periodic accountings help protect assets and create a public record that promotes transparency. Additionally, the court can tailor orders to the individual’s situation and modify them if conditions change. For families facing complex financial or medical concerns, this structure can reduce uncertainty and provide a mechanism for long term protection and accountability.
Another benefit is the ability to resolve disputes through judicial oversight, which can prevent ongoing family conflict from compromising care and asset protection. The court process includes notice to interested parties, consideration of less restrictive alternatives, and the option to appoint an independent guardian ad litem to advocate for the person’s interests. For those worried about vulnerability to financial abuse or unclear decision making, the court’s involvement creates a formal plan with expectations for reporting and review that helps keep decisions focused on the person’s welfare.
Formal Oversight and Accountability
Formal oversight requires periodic reporting and court review, which encourages careful stewardship of the person’s resources and attentive decision making. This accountability reduces the risk of misuse or neglect by making guardians and conservators answerable to the court. It also creates a documented record of decisions that can be helpful for future needs, including tax filings, benefits administration, and resolving disagreements. For families seeking reliability and transparency, formal oversight ensures that there are enforceable standards governing how the person’s affairs are managed over time.
Recognition by Institutions and Third Parties
A court order carries legal authority that banks, medical facilities, and government agencies accept without dispute, facilitating access to accounts, benefits, and care decisions. This recognition avoids delays and obstacles that often arise when private documents are absent or contested. It ensures that authorized decision makers can act promptly on behalf of the person and reduces administrative friction. For families navigating complex financial holdings, insurance matters, or eligibility for public benefits, institutional recognition of court appointed roles provides practical advantages that support timely and effective management.
Practice Areas
Top Searched Keywords
- Guardianship attorney Rocky Top
- Conservatorship lawyer Anderson County
- Tennessee guardianship process
- limited guardianship Tennessee
- powers of attorney Rocky Top
- probate court Anderson County
- ward and conservator Tennessee
- estate planning Rocky Top
- guardianship alternatives Tennessee
Practical Tips for Handling Guardianship and Conservatorship
Start Planning Early
Starting planning early can prevent many problems that arise when someone becomes unable to make decisions. Preparing powers of attorney, health care directives, and a clear inventory of assets while a person still has capacity gives family members the authority they may need and reduces the likelihood of contested court proceedings. Early planning also allows individuals to express preferences about care and finances, which courts will consider. Taking a proactive approach helps preserve autonomy, reduce stress for loved ones, and create a smoother transition if decision making assistance becomes necessary in the future.
Document Key Information
Consider Less Restrictive Options First
When possible, consider alternatives to full guardianship or conservatorship such as durable powers of attorney, limited financial arrangements, or supported decision making. These options can preserve more of the individual’s autonomy and are often quicker and less costly than court supervised proceedings. If court involvement becomes necessary, ensure the request is narrowly tailored to the person’s needs. Courts generally prefer the least restrictive alternative that still protects the person, and families benefit from exploring all available options before filing a petition.
Common Reasons Families Seek Guardianship or Conservatorship
Families consider guardianship or conservatorship when an adult no longer can make safe personal or financial decisions due to conditions such as dementia, severe mental illness, stroke effects, or traumatic injury. These arrangements are sought when concerns about safety, inability to manage bills, or vulnerability to financial abuse are present. Courts evaluate medical evidence and other factors to determine capacity, and they may appoint a guardian, a conservator, or both to address those needs. The goal is to ensure appropriate care and protect assets while using the least restrictive measures appropriate to the circumstances.
Other triggers for considering court appointed decision makers include sudden incapacity with no prior planning documents, disputes among family members about care or finances, and situations where banks or benefits administrators require a court order to release funds. Some public benefits and certain types of care arrangements also require proof of authority to act on behalf of the person. In these cases, a guardianship or conservatorship order clarifies authority and enables necessary actions to secure housing, medical treatment, and financial stability for the person in need.
Typical Circumstances That Lead to Guardianship or Conservatorship Petitions
Typical circumstances include progressive cognitive decline such as Alzheimer’s disease, sudden severe medical events like a stroke, traumatic brain injury, or chronic mental health conditions that impair judgment and self care. Other scenarios include when an adult’s finances are being mismanaged by others or when complex estates require formal management to pay for long term care. When medical assessments indicate that a person cannot meet basic needs or protect assets, families or agencies may petition the court for a formal arrangement to ensure ongoing care and financial oversight.
Cognitive Decline and Memory Loss
Memory loss and progressive cognitive decline make it difficult for individuals to manage medications, keep appointments, and make sound financial choices. Families facing this situation may find that informal assistance is no longer sufficient and that a formal guardianship or conservatorship order provides the authority needed to arrange care, make health decisions, and protect resources. Courts review medical documentation and other evidence to determine whether such an appointment is necessary and will seek to limit the order to areas where the person truly needs help.
Sudden Incapacity from Injury or Illness
Sudden events such as a major stroke or head injury can leave an adult unable to understand choices or manage assets overnight. When no advance directives exist, courts can act quickly to appoint decision makers who can coordinate medical care, arrange placement, and manage finances. The probate process includes evaluations and hearings but can be expedited in urgent situations. Families often need to assemble medical records and documentation of the person’s needs to support a petition and explain why immediate authority is necessary for safe and orderly care.
Financial Exploitation or Mismanagement
When there is evidence of financial abuse, mismanagement, or predatory transactions that threaten the person’s assets, a conservatorship can stop further harm and provide court supervised management of funds. Courts may require inventories, bonds, and regular accountings to protect the estate. Taking prompt action can prevent irreversible loss and ensure funds are used for the person’s care. Documentation of questionable transactions, bank records, and witness statements are often important in convincing the court that protective measures are warranted.
Local Guardianship and Conservatorship Services in Rocky Top
Jay Johnson Law Firm offers assistance to families in Rocky Top and Anderson County who are navigating guardianship and conservatorship issues. We provide guidance on available options, help prepare petitions and required supporting documents, and represent clients in probate court when necessary. The firm focuses on practical solutions that protect the person’s welfare and preserve assets. Families can expect clear explanations of timelines, court requirements, and ongoing reporting duties so they can plan effectively and act confidently in securing the appropriate legal authority for their loved one.
Why Choose Jay Johnson Law Firm for Guardianship and Conservatorship Matters
Choosing an attorney for guardianship or conservatorship matters means selecting someone who understands Tennessee probate procedures and local court practices in Anderson County. Jay Johnson Law Firm focuses on estate planning and probate work and can help families identify whether a court proceeding is necessary or if less intrusive alternatives will suffice. The firm assists with preparing petitions, coordinating medical documentation, and communicating with interested parties to minimize disputes and streamline the process whenever possible.
The firm places emphasis on clear communication, practical planning, and careful attention to court requirements such as inventories and accountings. Families receive guidance on what documentation to gather, how to notify interested parties, and what to expect at hearings. The goal is to reduce uncertainty and support orderly decision making so families can focus on care rather than procedural confusion. Jay Johnson Law Firm provides responsive assistance tailored to each family’s situation in Rocky Top and the surrounding communities.
When court intervention is required, having someone familiar with local probate practices can make the process less stressful. The firm works to explain options, prepare filings accurately, and represent clients’ interests throughout hearings and required reporting. For families concerned about timelines, asset protection, or safe care arrangements, working with an experienced probate team ensures that tasks like inventories, bond requirements, and accountings are handled promptly and correctly to meet the court’s standards and protect the person’s well being.
Contact Us to Discuss Guardianship and Conservatorship Options
Our Process for Handling Guardianship and Conservatorship Matters
Our process begins with a consultation to assess the situation, review available documents, and identify immediate needs. We explain potential alternatives like powers of attorney and discuss whether a guardianship or conservatorship petition is the best path. If court action is appropriate, we prepare and file the petition, coordinate required medical evaluations, provide notice to interested parties, and represent clients at hearings. After appointment, we assist with inventories, accountings, and compliance with court reporting requirements, helping appointed decision makers meet their obligations and manage affairs responsibly.
Step One: Initial Assessment and Planning
In the initial assessment we collect relevant background information, review medical records, and identify whether advance directives or powers of attorney exist. This phase evaluates capacity concerns, potential conflicts, and immediate needs such as medical decisions or access to funds for care. We discuss alternatives to court proceedings and explain the probable timeline and documentation required if a petition is needed. Clear planning at the outset helps frame the petition in terms the court will consider and can reduce delays in securing authority for necessary decisions.
Collecting Medical and Financial Evidence
Gathering medical evaluations and financial information is essential to support a petition. Medical opinions that describe the person’s decision making capacity, records of hospitalizations or treatments, and documentation of impaired functioning strengthen the case. Financial statements, bank records, and lists of assets help the court understand the estate and determine what protections are needed. Preparing thorough supporting materials reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings and allows the court to make a well informed decision about the scope of any appointment.
Explaining Alternatives and Limits
Before filing, we ensure families understand alternatives such as durable powers of attorney or targeted arrangements that may avoid a court case. When filing is necessary, we seek to limit the powers requested to those required to address the person’s immediate needs. Courts prefer less restrictive measures when feasible, so presenting a narrowly tailored petition may lead to an order that preserves the individual’s remaining rights. Clear communication about limits also reduces family conflict and helps interested parties see the petition is focused on protection rather than unnecessary control.
Step Two: Filing the Petition and Court Proceedings
Filing the petition formally starts the court process and triggers notice requirements for the proposed ward and other interested parties. The petition includes a description of the person’s condition, proposed guardian or conservator, and supporting medical evidence. Courts may appoint an independent guardian ad litem to investigate and represent the person’s interests. Hearings provide an opportunity for the court to hear from family members, the proposed decision maker, and any appointed advocate before reaching a determination about capacity and the appropriate scope of authority.
Notice and Opportunity to be Heard
The court requires notice to the proposed ward and certain family members to ensure fairness and allow objections. Interested parties have an opportunity to attend hearings, present evidence, and question proposed decision makers. This transparency helps prevent wrongful appointments and gives the court a fuller picture of the person’s needs and family dynamics. It also creates a formal record of the proceedings, which may be important if the case is later reviewed or modified. Ensuring proper notice and representation protects everyone involved.
Court Determination and Orders
After reviewing evidence and hearing testimony, the court will determine whether the person lacks capacity and, if so, issue an order appointing a guardian, conservator, or both. The order specifies the powers granted, reporting obligations, and any required bond or oversight measures. The court may grant limited powers tailored to specific needs. Once issued, the order is the official authority for decision making and must be followed by institutions that require proof of legal authority to act on the person’s behalf.
Step Three: Duties After Appointment and Ongoing Compliance
Following an appointment, the guardian or conservator must carry out duties such as filing inventories, submitting periodic accountings, and following court directives. These obligations ensure that the person’s assets are managed responsibly and that care decisions remain in the person’s best interest. Guardians and conservators may need to coordinate with doctors, insurers, financial institutions, and care providers. Ongoing compliance with reporting requirements and transparency to the court help prevent disputes and allow for modifications if the person’s condition improves or circumstances change.
Inventory and Accountings
Inventories list the person’s assets at the time of appointment and provide the court with a baseline for oversight. Regular accountings show how funds are used and document financial decisions. These records are essential to demonstrate fiduciary responsibility and protect both the person and the appointed decision maker. Accurate bookkeeping, prompt reporting, and preservation of receipts and statements minimize disputes and satisfy the court’s requirements for transparency and stewardship of the ward’s estate.
Modifications and Termination
If the person’s condition improves or circumstances change, parties can petition the court to modify or terminate the guardianship or conservatorship. Courts review new medical evidence and other facts to determine whether continued supervision is needed. Regular review protects the person’s rights by ensuring that authority remains aligned with current needs. Termination can restore autonomy when appropriate and courts encourage adjustments when less restrictive alternatives become viable, reflecting the ongoing balance between protection and independence.
Frequently Asked Questions about Guardianship and Conservatorship
What is the difference between guardianship and conservatorship?
Guardianship typically refers to authority over personal and health care decisions, while conservatorship relates to financial and property management. The court can appoint one person to perform both roles or separate individuals for each function. Each appointment includes defined duties, reporting requirements, and limits tailored to the person’s needs. Understanding the difference helps families determine which authority is appropriate for addressing medical, residential, or financial concerns and ensures the petition asks for only the powers necessary to protect the person.
How do I know if guardianship or conservatorship is necessary?
Deciding whether guardianship or conservatorship is necessary starts with assessing the person’s ability to understand decisions and manage daily life or finances. Medical evaluations, observations of daily functioning, and evidence of financial mismanagement inform this assessment. If the person lacks capacity and there are no valid advance directives or trusted agents in place, a court proceeding may be required to obtain legal authority for decisions. Consulting with a probate attorney and collecting medical documentation helps clarify whether petitioning the court is the best option.
Can guardianship or conservatorship be limited in scope?
Yes, courts can and often do limit the scope of guardianship and conservatorship to specific areas where help is needed. For example, a court may grant authority for medical decisions while leaving other matters to the person, or authorize a conservator only to manage large financial transactions. Limited orders preserve the person’s autonomy when possible and avoid unnecessary removal of rights. When filing a petition, it is advisable to request only the powers that address demonstrated needs and to present evidence supporting a tailored approach.
What alternatives exist to avoid court proceedings?
Alternatives include durable powers of attorney for finances, health care directives, and supported decision making agreements that enable trusted agents to assist without court involvement. These options are only available if the person has capacity to execute such documents. In many cases, these private arrangements are faster, less formal, and preserve more independence. When planning ahead, executing clear written authorizations and discussing wishes with loved ones can prevent the need for contested court proceedings in the future.
How long does the guardianship or conservatorship process take?
The timeline depends on the complexity of the case, the need for medical evaluations, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested matters with clear supporting medical evidence may move through probate in a matter of weeks or a few months, while contested cases or those requiring additional investigation can take longer. Promptly gathering medical records and financial documentation and providing required notice to interested parties helps reduce delays. Working with counsel familiar with local probate procedures can help streamline filings and scheduling.
What duties will a guardian or conservator have after appointment?
After appointment, guardians and conservators must follow duties imposed by the court, which commonly include filing inventories of assets, submitting periodic accountings, and making decisions consistent with the ward’s best interests. Guardians oversee personal care and medical decisions, while conservators manage money and property. Both roles require accurate record keeping, transparency, and compliance with reporting timelines. These duties promote responsible stewardship and provide the court with oversight necessary to protect the person’s interests over time.
Will the court appoint someone outside the family?
Courts give preference to family members who are willing and able to serve, but if family is unavailable or there are conflicts, the court may appoint a neutral third party or a public fiduciary. The selection aims to ensure the person’s needs are met by someone capable of fulfilling the responsibilities. The court will consider relationships, availability, potential conflicts of interest, and the ability to manage the required duties when making an appointment that best serves the person’s welfare.
Can a ward regain decision making authority?
Yes, a ward can regain decision making authority if medical evidence shows a meaningful improvement in capacity. Interested parties can petition the court to modify or terminate the guardianship or conservatorship, and the court will review new evaluations and relevant facts. The process is designed to restore autonomy when appropriate, reflecting the court’s interest in using the least restrictive intervention necessary. Regular review and updated medical documentation are important to support these requests for modification.
How are financial abuses prevented once a conservator is appointed?
To prevent financial abuse, courts can require bonds, regular accountings, and periodic oversight to monitor the conservator’s handling of assets. Banks and institutions may also impose controls and require documentation for transactions. These layers of oversight reduce the opportunity for misuse and create accountability through court review. Promptly reporting suspicious transactions to the court and maintaining thorough records further helps protect the person’s estate and allows for corrective action if problems arise.
How much will it cost to pursue guardianship or conservatorship?
Costs vary based on the complexity of the case, whether the petition is contested, and attorney fees or court costs in Anderson County. Uncontested matters generally cost less and involve fees for filing, notices, and possible medical evaluations. Contested cases can be substantially more expensive due to hearings, additional evaluations, and longer attorney involvement. Discussing fee structures upfront, exploring limited scope services, and considering mediation for disputes can help families manage costs while pursuing necessary protections for the person.